On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
Some comments:
MANIFEST.in is fine
Except that it introduces Yet Another Domain Specific Language. Wtf
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this. Remember: I wanted to deprecate MANIFEST.in in favor of
a pure python description. Then people strongly objected.
How many people objected? Would it be OK to only have support for this
in an external
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:21, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this. Remember: I wanted to deprecate MANIFEST.in in favor of
a pure python description. Then people strongly objected.
How many people
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:03, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
But I will not work in flame-threads anymore on my side.
Probably a good idea.
The only thing I'm worried about is the fact that you are proposing
both to remove and add things to distutils. Although backports will be
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:03, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
But I will not work in flame-threads anymore on my side.
Probably a good idea.
The only thing I'm worried about is the fact that you are proposing
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 13:01, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think we want to break any current feature in 2.7, we will
probably just display
deprecation warnings and keep them, then wait until the next python version.
And if someone want to use your package, that uses a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
Some comments:
MANIFEST.in is fine
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 14:23, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I want *less* stuff (ideally nothing) spelled in imperative Python, with
some common declarative file replacing both the information currently in
setup.py and MANIFEST.in. I thought we were in agreement that
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone
Tres Seaver wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
Some comments:
MANIFEST.in is fine
Except that it
At 02:33 PM 4/8/2009 +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 14:23, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I want *less* stuff (ideally nothing) spelled in imperative Python, with
some common declarative file replacing both the information currently in
setup.py and MANIFEST.in.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 20:18, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone wants to work on it, or comment,
Some comments:
MANIFEST.in is fine
Except that it introduces Yet Another Domain Specific Language. Wtf
does prune mean? It's not obvious. The docs indicate that it
actually
12 matches
Mail list logo
