Hi,
Going back in time to this old post, but I think it becomes more relevant
now that Nate's work is being completed:
On 13 August 2015 at 22:47, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> wrote:
> >
> > On 13
On Sep 8, 2015 1:33 PM, "Donald Stufft" wrote:
>
> On September 8, 2015 at 1:29:53 PM, Nate Coraor (n...@bx.psu.edu) wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >
> > > On September 3, 2015 at 1:23:03 PM, Nate Coraor (n...@bx.psu.edu)
wrote:
> > > > >>>
>
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0425/#platform-tag is currently defined
in terms of distutils get_platform(). Instead, it could be defined more
abstractly to read something like "The platform tag expresses which
system(s) might be capable of running or linking with binary components of
the
That's nice for singling out some packages (though I only found a , but I
had a different use-case in mind, which I guess I didn't fully articulate:
I might want binary wheels for some packages, just not coming from PyPI,
where I don't necessarily trust whatever was put there. I'm perfectly fine
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On September 3, 2015 at 1:23:03 PM, Nate Coraor (n...@bx.psu.edu) wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll create PRs for this against wheel and pip shortly. I can also work
>> >>> on a PEP for the platform tag - I don't think it's going
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> On September 3, 2015 at 1:23:03 PM, Nate Coraor (n...@bx.psu.edu) wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I'll create PRs for this against wheel and pip shortly. I can also
> work
> > >>> on a PEP for the platform tag - I don't think it's
On September 8, 2015 at 1:29:53 PM, Nate Coraor (n...@bx.psu.edu) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> > On September 3, 2015 at 1:23:03 PM, Nate Coraor (n...@bx.psu.edu) wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'll create PRs for this against wheel and pip shortly. I can also
>