Re: [Distutils] Accepting PEP 541?

This looks great: thanks for moving it along! Minor notes (all copy editing): It could use some editing to bring it into the present: """ Existing package repositories such as CPAN [3] , NPM [4] ,

Re: [Distutils] PEP 517 - is it ready?

Go for it. On 11 September 2017 at 11:36, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > Discussion on PEP 517 seems to have settled down, and I believe that > Nick said he was about ready to accept it. Is everyone involved > satisfied with the current state? Or is there anything else you think >

[Distutils] PEP 517 - is it ready?

Discussion on PEP 517 seems to have settled down, and I believe that Nick said he was about ready to accept it. Is everyone involved satisfied with the current state? Or is there anything else you think should be considered before accepting it? https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0517/

Re: [Distutils] Install psutil without gcc?

Am 08.09.2017 um 14:54 schrieb Thomas Güttler: It would be great, if I could install psutil without the need for a gcc on linux. The maintainer (Giampaolo Rodola) is interested, but the roadmap is not clear yet. He said: > It's something which needs to be investigated. A quick Google