Hi Russ,
On Jul 10, 8:24 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be most sensible to treat the URL mount point similarly to
> > hostname, since they are really just two pieces of the
On Jul 11, 12:14 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> > So you can't put reverse now in settings.py unless there is some
> > late-binding construct, like
>
> > LOGIN_URL = RevLink('accounts:login', account_type='user')
>
> You shouldn't have to put reverse() calls into
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 7:11 pm, Graham Dumpleton
>> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> web application, to be a well behaved
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On Jul 7, 7:11 pm, Graham Dumpleton
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> web application, to be a well behaved WSGI citizen, should honour
>> SCRIPT_NAME setting as supplied by the server, and ensure that
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:19 AM, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Tom,
>
> HTTP_HOST and other don't solve the multiple-host deployment, and it
> is a solution you can do by yourself if you need.
>
> I'd like to see better solution: ability to make reverse work for such URLs.
> I
On Jul 7, 7:11 pm, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
[snip]
> web application, to be a well behaved WSGI citizen, should honour
> SCRIPT_NAME setting as supplied by the server, and ensure that ways
> are provided such that everything in the users code, including
> configuration,
Tom,
HTTP_HOST and other don't solve the multiple-host deployment, and it
is a solution you can do by yourself if you need.
I'd like to see better solution: ability to make reverse work for such URLs.
I think, currently the problem is in the binding time:
The load order is typically the
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Personally, I see this as a case of explicit vs implicit.
>
> As currently defined, LOGIN_URL points to the login URL. Period.
>
> Under the proposed patch, the onus is on every possible script to
> ensure that
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> Can the following issue be revisited.
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8906
>
> Conversation about it at:
>
>
Can the following issue be revisited.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8906
Conversation about it at:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_frm/thread/c457599caab6e87d/b70e1f56ad38f4cb
This is another of those issues where Django isn't being particular
friendly to people
10 matches
Mail list logo