Hello,
I'm surprised this is marked as a "do not fix" bug. I mean,
essentially these Q objects will at the end of the day define sets of
objects, and it doesn't seem expected behavior to me to say a OR b is
a subset of b. Currently I am working around this by explicitly taking
IDs, and doing ors
Hi,
On 4 Lut, 00:46, "Mike Axiak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> y = Q(satprepreginfo__program = program)
>
> z = Q(registrationprofile__program = program) & \
>Q(registrationprofile__student_info__isnull = False)
>
> This is my result:
>
> In [27]: User.objects.filter(y |
On 2/4/07, Mike Axiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Below is the SQL the query,
> User.objects.filter(y|z).distinct().count(),
> generates.
>
> It seems to do the correct OR for the where clauses, and yet still
> uses an INNER JOIN when that type of join is inappropriate for this
> particular
Below is the SQL the query,
User.objects.filter(y|z).distinct().count(),
generates.
It seems to do the correct OR for the where clauses, and yet still
uses an INNER JOIN when that type of join is inappropriate for this
particular query. Is this a known problem? Did I write the queries
On 2/4/07, Ramiro Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now the question :): Why does Django model validation reports name clash
> errors and suggests to use related_name when clearly there are not
> such clashes?:
I can't see any immediately obvious reason - looks like you may have
found a
Hey,
I'm using Django release (currently 0.95.0, waiting for etch to move
to 0.95.1) with some patches (lazyuser patch comes to mind) on an
internal development.
The question is, I was trying to do some Q object combinations and was
met with some weird results:
y = Q(satprepreginfo__program =
Hi guys!
I have a project to publish accounting offices on the internet. All
the
accounting offices will have usefull tools avaiable on a centralized
page and each office will have a specific homepage built from database
information. My simplified model structure is:
class Office(Model):
Hi,
(I'm trying to create test cases for ticket #2536 and this is something I
hadn't noted until now):
Say I have a models.py file almost identical to the modeltest/example #24:
from django.db import models
class Parent( models.Model ):
name = models.CharField(maxlength=100)
child =
On 3 Lut, 20:58, "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you suggest for this?
If it needs to be a singleton, you could consider deploying under
FastCGI, I believe the process is started only once and the real
server acts simply as a proxy.
But note that I _believe_, not know :)
On 2/3/07, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do you suggest for this?
>
Is there a single shared state among all players, or is it per player?
If the former, you must already have some way of managing concurrency, no?
In any case, it sounds like maybe you want a
Thanks a lot, I haven't practice Python for a while, forgot lots of
things...
2007/2/3, Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On 2/2/07, Sebastien Armand [Pink] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it possible to instantiate a model class from a dictionnary?
> >
> > I mean instead of using:
> >
> >
I have a web app which currently runs off Python's BaseHTTPServer. I
want to deploy it under Django instead.
It contains a Python object (the state of play of a board game) which
lives in the process running the server.
If I deploy under Django I'll need some way of keeping the object
around
Actually, it looks like Atom1Feed is where the restriction is.
Anyone have a replacement for Atom1Feed that does full-content?
Otherwise, I'll write one and contribute it (I'm working on Django
support for the Atom Publishing Protocol, anyway)
James
On 03/02/2007, at 2:39 PM, James Tauber
But the description template seems to just control the content of the
summary element in Atom.
If I want a full content feed, rather than just a summary, it looks
like I can't use django.contrib.syndication.views.feed
On 03/02/2007, at 4:47 AM, aaloy wrote:
> 2007/2/3, James Tauber <[EMAIL
On Feb 2, 2007, at 14:51 , kamil wrote:
> Surely it's solved but I can't find any info about it. I'm sure that
> everybody met this problem.
> What is the best way to get rendered the value from the field with
> choices.
> Generic views spits key not value.
.get__display()
--
Nebojša Đorđević
I figured it out, I left off
from mysite.views import current_datetime
On Feb 3, 8:50 am, "gordyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy Mike,
>
> > def current_datetime(request):
> > now = datetime.datetime.now()
> > html = "It is now %s." % now
> > return
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> Look in django.contrib.auth.models for UserManager for implementation details.
Nice. Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this
Cool, so you write a view that returns what, json, html? Do you
recommend any specific library or possibly have an example? Since
I've never done it, I'm wondering where all the pieces fit in the
django layout. I'll search the ML for tips.
Thanks.
On Feb 3, 6:11 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello :)
> It's 2007. There's better ways of doing these things than littering
> your html with event handlers.
The way of using of such thing was:
...
form.field_name js_fct_string
...
js_fct_handler could be something like this:
"onclick=some_js_fct(this)"
To achieve something like this i
When I'm doing something like that, I use ajax to do the server side
stuff and return the message without ever leaving the page.
On Feb 2, 7:39 pm, "Milan Andric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small problem, I'm submitting a review form (form x) on a
> page that has many of
Howdy Mike,
> def current_datetime(request):
> now = datetime.datetime.now()
> html = "It is now %s." % now
> return HttpResponse(html)
>
> - then edit your urls.py to contain
>
> from django.conf.urls.defaults import *
>
> urlpatterns = patterns('',
>
2007/2/3, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> However, I'd like my feed to be full content. Given what I have
> below, what's the most straightforward way to make my feed full content?
The full content would depend on your template. That is, you can make
your template to present full content,
I'm baffled. I'm just getting started with django and am reading the
'Django Book'. In chapter 3 I'm told,
- Make a file called views.py that contains:
from django.http import HttpResponse
import datetime
def current_datetime(request):
now = datetime.datetime.now()
html = "It
23 matches
Mail list logo
