Hi,
I need to cache POST requests, too, on certain requests.
The requests are not changing data, but imagine an XMLRPC
service (that is based on POST requests only per spec anyway) uses
functions, that always return the same like 2 + 2 SHOULD always
return 4 :-) The site I have could use the
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Tim wrote:
> The issue is getting Django admin to recognize this. Has anyone seen
> or done anything like this? I have a few ideas where to begin, but
> figured I would ask first so I don't end up re-inventing the wheel if
> something has
I've only 21 million rows in one of my tables and querying it is not a
problem. First check that suggested function based index, it might help
and you don't need to do anything.
istartswith uses "not so good" format. We have got around it using
additional field that is autopopulated, in your case
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:20 +1100, Justin Steward wrote:
> I had a similar requirement for a current project. Users in the admin
> needed to be able to see ONLY the objects that they had created.
>
> My solution was:
> 1) http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/CookBookThreadlocalsAndUser
> 2) Add
I'm trying to find a solution to this very same issue. At the very
least, I think inlines should support custom callables.
The inline I'm displaying is an intermediary table for a ManyToMany
relationship. So I have a selector for the related object, but what I
would like to do in the inline is
Sorry for the code formatting.
Nevertheless, I`ve already tryed this kind of setting and was getting
the "Connection timed out" socket error.
It seems that some smtp-servers require the connection to be ssl-
encrypted from the very start, without special enabling.
On Jan 13, 5:22 am, phan sarak
Try look at
http://www.packtpub.com/article/friends-via-email-social-web-application-django-1.0
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM, vlk wrote:
> I use an smtp server that requires smtplib.SMTP_SSL class to be used
> for email sending. The usual EMAIL_USE_TSL=True setting
I use an smtp server that requires smtplib.SMTP_SSL class to be used
for email sending. The usual EMAIL_USE_TSL=True setting doesn`t work.
Changing following lines in the django.core.mail module from
self.connection = smtplib.SMTP(self.host, self.port,
Hi,
I'm creating an invoicing application, and the idea is to download the
invoices as pdf files using an admin action. Something like:
def create_invoices(modeladmin, request, queryset):
invoices = []
for invoice in queryset:
invoices.append(invoice.as_pdf())
return
but receive the error below. Completely new at django so help is
appreciated.
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://localhost:8080/feeds/latest/
Django Version: 1.1
Python Version: 2.6.2
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
I had a similar requirement for a current project. Users in the admin
needed to be able to see ONLY the objects that they had created.
My solution was:
1) http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/CookBookThreadlocalsAndUser
2) Add foreign key to model to track which user created the object.
3) Use the
In theory, given a form exists which allows the user to choose from a
drop down list of editorial boards that they could potentially be a
part of...and given a list of positions within an editorial board
(i.e. editor in chief, guest editor, co editor, etc)...what would be
the most efficient way to
On 12 tammi, 22:20, nameless wrote:
> The table is queried from ajax using an autocomplete field with this
> query in the views.py:
>
> books.objects.filter(book_title__istartswith=request.GET['q'])[:100]
>
At least in postgres you need a special kind of index to run
I'm trying to make a model's detail view, take movies for example;
actors are m2m to movies
this works but it doesn't feel right is there, i pass this context to
the template where i for loop through the actor list
>>> Movie.objects.filter(pk=movie_id)[0].character.all()
[, ]
--
You received
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:40:50PM -0800, Daniel Roseman wrote:
> On Jan 12, 9:29 pm, Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> > I have a model that has an IntegerField. I'd like to filter only the
> > even integers. sqlite has a modulus operator so I can do:
> >
> > select * from
When migrating an existing db how do you create a proper join table
for a ManyToMany field. I think I've got it mostly worked out except
for the bit that looks like this in Django generated SQL:
CREATE TABLE `blog_posts_authors` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`post_id` int(11) NOT
On Jan 12, 9:29 pm, Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> I have a model that has an IntegerField. I'd like to filter only the
> even integers. sqlite has a modulus operator so I can do:
>
> select * from mytable where my_int = my_int % 2
Er, that doesn't give you even integers, it
I have a model that has an IntegerField. I'd like to filter only the
even integers. sqlite has a modulus operator so I can do:
select * from mytable where my_int = my_int % 2
However, I'd like to use the QuerySet API to do this instead of
resorting to SQL. Any ideas or hints?
Thanks,
Ryan
What might be useful is to figure out exactly what SQL Django winds up
running then doing an "EXPLAIN " on that query in your DBMS from the
command line. That will let you know what the backend is doing and what the
performance considerations you should take are.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:20 PM,
The table is queried from ajax using an autocomplete field with this
query in the views.py:
books.objects.filter(book_title__istartswith=request.GET['q'])[:100]
---
On Jan 12, 8:47 pm, Chris Czub wrote:
> It really depends on how you're selecting the data
Hi,
I have three models:
Product
SimpleProduct that extends Product
GroupProduct that extends Product and have ManyToMany relation with
SimpleProduct
The reason to use the base Product model is so I can use paging.
Is it possible to make a query that gives a list of GroupProducts and
It really depends on how you're selecting the data from the database. If
you're doing something that necessitates a full table scan(like in-DB ORDER
BY) it will slow you down considerably. If you're selecting one row from the
database by an indexed column, then the performance will be very fast
On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:25 PM, nameless wrote:
> My table with 4 milions of rows is queried often by ajax.
> So I think a performance problems ( I am using also index ).
> Ok now take a look at the contenttypes :)
I don't know what overhead django will put on the queries but 4 million rows
Cache the content of the table, maybe using memcached,and only go to the DB
if needed.
Victor Lima
2010/1/12 nameless
> My table with 4 milions of rows is queried often by ajax.
> So I think a performance problems ( I am using also index ).
> Ok now take a look at the
My table with 4 milions of rows is queried often by ajax.
So I think a performance problems ( I am using also index ).
Ok now take a look at the contenttypes :)
On Jan 12, 8:15 pm, Tim wrote:
> As far as needing to split up the table into other tables, I'm
davathar wrote:
Unfortunately adding the rewrite rule mentioned as a work around
hasn't worked for me.
Please post the relevant section of your Apache config (including your
wsgi *and* rewrite lines), there's no reason the rewrite rule workaround
shouldn't work for you...
Chris
--
As far as needing to split up the table into other tables, I'm not
sure. Whats wrong with having 4 million records in one table?
But if you're going to do it, take a look at the contenttypes
framework and generic relations. It basically does what you're
describing:
Thanks, man, that was it.
On Jan 12, 3:39 am, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On 12 jan, 03:32, neridaj wrote:
>
> > I've been testing my site locally and figured I should commit some of
> > my changes. I'm using django.contrib.comments and for
Yes, with proper caching and well-tuned queries sure you can, and thats what
I did, if you read the thread, and then, only then, I managed to get
"thousands of requests per seconds", indeed.
But without cache and even with well-tuned queries and db indexes, I couldnt
manage to go over 10
Hi at all. I have a project with 2 applications ( books and reader ).
Books application has a table with 4 milions of rows with this fields:
book_title = models.CharField(max_length=40)
book_description = models.CharField(max_length=400)
To avoid to query the database with 4 milions of rows,
On 01/12/2010 01:12 PM, Victor Loureiro Lima wrote:
Me neither, so the question remains: Is it an EC2 thing or is it common
to django?
I know that this topic is sensitive for overall web-development
frameworks such as PHP, django, and ruby.
It would be usefull if other users of this forum could
Me neither, so the question remains: Is it an EC2 thing or is it common to
django?
I know that this topic is sensitive for overall web-development frameworks
such as PHP, django, and ruby.
It would be usefull if other users of this forum could post on the
"requests/s" and give some setup info, so
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Steve McConville <
mcconville.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, hosted in US-East-1, but I was running benchmark tests from another
> EC2
> > instance in the same region, so reasonably sure it's not latency.
>
> I meant latencies internal to EC2; eg. what is your
> Yes, hosted in US-East-1, but I was running benchmark tests from another EC2
> instance in the same region, so reasonably sure it's not latency.
I meant latencies internal to EC2; eg. what is your ping time between
the frontend and the DB box? The article I linked to reports that this
has been
Yes, we are also on a m1.small instance.
The bench we ran in our development environment went bad, but that was
mostly because its a virtual machine, shared with a few other resources,
plus the DB machine was also under high usage and shared, thats why we had
aprox. 10 request/s on dev env.
So
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Victor Loureiro Lima <
victorloureirol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we currently have a website running on django EC2, and its running great,
> really great. We managed to handle 300 requests/s on our stress tests on a
> heavy page... but, we only managed to
Yes, me too.. The benchmark were executed from another EC2 instance, so we
could ignore latency.
cheers,
victor lima
2010/1/12 Malcolm Box
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Steve McConville <
> mcconville.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > EC2 m1.small instance, talking to
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Steve McConville <
mcconville.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > EC2 m1.small instance, talking to another m1.small instance hosting MySQL
> db
> >
> > DB performance doesn't seem to be the issue - I don't see the DB server
> > under any load at all.
>
> What sort of
There are a few changes to the filter syntax if you want to get
records that a certain user has access to. So lets say Cars are
"namespaced". To get all the cars that are colored blue, you can still
do this.
Cars.objects.filter(color='blue')
But to get all the cars that are color blue that only
I'm currently using the site._registry approach. I was hoping there
was either a more "official" way.
Incidentally, the registry is a dict so you should be able to access
the model directly.
from django.contrib import admin
def get_admin(model):
if model in admin.site._registry
Hello,
we currently have a website running on django EC2, and its running great,
really great. We managed to handle 300 requests/s on our stress tests on a
heavy page... but, we only managed to get that after we used the django's
cache systems, before that we were running close to 10 requests/s
> EC2 m1.small instance, talking to another m1.small instance hosting MySQL db
>
> DB performance doesn't seem to be the issue - I don't see the DB server
> under any load at all.
What sort of network latencies are you seeing? Are they hosted in US-East-1?
Tim,
I look forward to seeing what you've put together. I'm not so much hung up on
terminology (group versus namespace) as functionality. I mentioned the
specifics in my last post, regarding not having to change the Django queryset
syntax in every view in the application. Does your solution
Hi,
I'm using Django on Amazon EC2 and seeing what I think are very low
throughputs ( < 15requests/s) for relatively simple pages.
Before I start digging into the root causes of this, I wondered if anyone
else was running Django on AWS and what sort of performance figures you were
seeing.
More
There's some good stuff in here. My requirements are a little
different than straight-up row level security.
I have a working prototype that I'm going to post on github later
today. It was a lot easier than I thought it would be.
It uses all the standard django permissions (create/change/delete
On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Gonzalo Delgado wrote:
>
> I'm facing similar requirements and came across this app:
>
>http://packages.python.org/django-authority/
>
> but haven't tried it out yet.
>
Well, I just read most of the docs, and it looks like this won't work for our
hi Gonzalo, i did nt find any help there.. could u please bclearer.. i
really ned it.. if u know plz help me...
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Gonzalo Delgado wrote:
> El 12/01/10 11:02, Shawn Milochik escribió:
> > This will help you get help:
> >
> >
On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Gonzalo Delgado wrote:
>>
>
> I'm facing similar requirements and came across this app:
>
>http://packages.python.org/django-authority/
>
> but haven't tried it out yet.
>
> --
> Gonzalo Delgado
>
Thanks, I'm looking into it now. It
El 12/01/10 11:02, Shawn Milochik escribió:
> This will help you get help:
>
> http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
+1
--
Gonzalo Delgado
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this
This will help you get help:
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hello all
could u please help me..
i want to use the multiple database in django.. i fallowed somany
procedures.. but i cont able to get how to use.. could u please tell
me in detailed the process for multiple databases in django.. with
sample settings.. please help me if u know this..
thank
Hi Daniel,
Thanx for the suggestions, i've got it working now! Up to the next
challenge :)
Greets Jop
On 12 jan, 12:17, Daniel Roseman wrote:
> On Jan 12, 10:54 am, Jop wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I struggeling with an error message for more
El 11/01/10 13:46, Tim escribió:
> There is an interesting requirement in a project I am working on. For
> lack of a better term, I'll call it Namespace Security. Basically,
> there are arbitrary namespaces that can be defined, and every object
> belongs to a namespace. Then, users only have
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Igor wrote:
> Thanks a lot - I didn't know about generic relations, and will
> definitely look at them - right now :).
I start thinking about extending models (and other DRY mode/db
methods) when I see myself repetitively typing out
On 12 jan, 03:32, neridaj wrote:
> I've been testing my site locally and figured I should commit some of
> my changes. I'm using django.contrib.comments and for some reason the
> comment.get_absolute_url is resulting in a broken link on the live
> server. When I mouse over
On Jan 12, 10:54 am, Jop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I struggeling with an error message for more than a day now and I
> can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. I'm still kindof a newbie with
> python/django so it might be very obvious..
>
> I am trying to create an inline form and
Hello,
I struggeling with an error message for more than a day now and I
can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. I'm still kindof a newbie with
python/django so it might be very obvious..
I am trying to create an inline form and I want to hide a field in
this form (specific: I want to hide the pk
This is ok if I did not want to use the possibility to upload to a
directory containing the the date...
If you read the specs :
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/ref/models/fields/#filefield
I can speciify that the upload path is formatted with :
DEFAULT_UPLOAD_SUBFOLDER = 'upload/%Y/%m/%d'
On Jan 12, 5:32 am, Mike Thon wrote:
> I have an object in my model that has a OneToOne relationship with an
> object in another app. I would like to customize the way my object is
> displayed in the admin interface by subclassing ModelAdmin as shown in
> the tutorial. I'm
On 12 Jan 2010, at 09:47 , Jirka Vejrazka wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You can't really. The code has to be executed, therefore it has to
> be readable by the server. So, by definition, it is readable by sever
> admin(s).. You could implement some obfuscation, but it,s not really
> worth it.
Well you can
You could try uploading your .pyc files, without your .py source.
That will be something of a maintenance night-mare, but should work
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi,
You can't really. The code has to be executed, therefore it has to
be readable by the server. So, by definition, it is readable by sever
admin(s).. You could implement some obfuscation, but it,s not really
worth it.
The best you can do is to check your hosting contract/agreement, see
thanks very much.
it seems self.instance always exists but its pk(id) is None when it's an add
and not None when it's modification.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Roseman"
To: "Django users"
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010
63 matches
Mail list logo