Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-23 Thread Hussein B
I didn't know that my question has political background :) On Jul 20, 2:15 pm, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle... > > > Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example: > > Britain has not had a new Prime

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-21 Thread Hernan Olivera
>> Heh, the USA has been stuck on version 50 since 1959 when Hawaii >> was added to the union. There are some development branches >> ("Puerto Rico" and "Virgin Islands" feature-branches are >> potential release-candidates, if a merge ever becomes official) >> moving towards version 51. Clearly

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread Tim Chase
>> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle... > > Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example: > Britain has not had a new Prime Minister since June 2007; does this > mean the British Government has not done anything in the past year? Heh, the USA has been

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Ingram
James Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle... >> > > Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example: > Britain has not had a new Prime Minister since June

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread James Bennett
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle... Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example: Britain has not had a new Prime Minister since June 2007; does this mean the British Government

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread Tim Chase
> Why there is no active development effort in Django framework? > Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong). I'm not sure where you get the idea that there's no active development...a quick check of the website (www.djangoproject.com) shows a flurry of activity. There hasn't

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread Hussein B
I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle... On Jul 20, 6:41 am, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why there is no active development effort in Django framework? > > Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong). > > I'm not sure where you get the idea that

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread Horst Gutmann
Uhm did you actually take a look at the timeline [1] before writing this? Or considered searching the archive of this mailinglist? [1] http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline -- Horst On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > Why there is no active

Re: Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread elithrar
On Jul 20, 7:14 pm, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > Why there is no active development effort in Django framework? > Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong). There is actually a lot of active development going on - the version numbering on the site isn't an accurate

Is Django development active?

2008-07-20 Thread Hussein B
Hi. Why there is no active development effort in Django framework? Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this