I didn't know that my question has political background :)
On Jul 20, 2:15 pm, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle...
>
> > Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example:
> > Britain has not had a new Prime
>> Heh, the USA has been stuck on version 50 since 1959 when Hawaii
>> was added to the union. There are some development branches
>> ("Puerto Rico" and "Virgin Islands" feature-branches are
>> potential release-candidates, if a merge ever becomes official)
>> moving towards version 51. Clearly
>> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle...
>
> Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example:
> Britain has not had a new Prime Minister since June 2007; does this
> mean the British Government has not done anything in the past year?
Heh, the USA has been
James Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle...
>>
>
> Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example:
> Britain has not had a new Prime Minister since June
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle...
Be careful with this logic, because it is misleading. For example:
Britain has not had a new Prime Minister since June 2007; does this
mean the British Government
> Why there is no active development effort in Django framework?
> Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong).
I'm not sure where you get the idea that there's no active
development...a quick check of the website
(www.djangoproject.com) shows a flurry of activity. There hasn't
I got that illusion due the slow official releases cycle...
On Jul 20, 6:41 am, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why there is no active development effort in Django framework?
> > Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong).
>
> I'm not sure where you get the idea that
Uhm did you actually take a look at the timeline [1] before
writing this? Or considered searching the archive of this mailinglist?
[1] http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline
-- Horst
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> Why there is no active
On Jul 20, 7:14 pm, Hussein B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> Why there is no active development effort in Django framework?
> Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong).
There is actually a lot of active development going on - the version
numbering on the site isn't an accurate
Hi.
Why there is no active development effort in Django framework?
Last edition released at October 2007 (if I'm not wrong).
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this
10 matches
Mail list logo