Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-30 Thread shabda
We used Dojo for our last project, but there was far too many things happening behind the scenes, and not really documented. We finally decided to rewrite evrything in Jquery. Now I never look farther than JQuery. :) Andre Meyer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Szaijan <[EMAIL

Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-29 Thread Andre Meyer
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Szaijan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In searching for a JS toolkit for my first JS app, I found YUI and > Dojo to be of equal power and utility, but YUI is MUCH better > documented. bad documentation for Dojo is a myth - nowadays. Dojo 1.1 is well documented

Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-29 Thread Szaijan
In searching for a JS toolkit for my first JS app, I found YUI and Dojo to be of equal power and utility, but YUI is MUCH better documented. If you like writing the widgets but need a cross- functional framework to put underneath them, try http://mochikit.com/. Very functional and well

Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-29 Thread Ken
If you're going to use YUI, I'd check out Ojay (http:// ojay.othermedia.org/). Raw YUI is very verbose; Ojay is a convenience layer on top of it. -Ken On Apr 29, 12:09 pm, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Going ahead with YUI. > > Reasons for choosing yui > 1) Free and from Yahoo.

Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-29 Thread ydjango
Thanks, Going ahead with YUI. Reasons for choosing yui 1) Free and from Yahoo. Well supported. 2) Grids 3) Datatable Surprising, how very few frameworks support data tables and how hard is to do data table. I would have expected this to be something out of box for all frameworks. Even

Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-22 Thread desfrenes
Don't miss JQuery ! On Apr 21, 8:33 pm, Rajesh Dhawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 21, 2:13 pm, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Django is a pretty good framework for server side web development. > > > client side Web development is also very time consuming and painful. > > > For

Re: Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-21 Thread Rajesh Dhawan
On Apr 21, 2:13 pm, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Django is a pretty good framework for server side web development. > > client side Web development is also very time consuming and painful. > > For Web Client side development, are there any good web ui frameworks > which can make

Suggestions on UI (client side web) framework to complement Django

2008-04-21 Thread ydjango
Django is a pretty good framework for server side web development. client side Web development is also very time consuming and painful. For Web Client side development, are there any good web ui frameworks which can make developing look and feel and ui of a web site as easy and as productive as