Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-30 Thread kajigga
Thanks for the tip. I hadn't had time to check on the commits or status of the project yet. Others have mentioned a "variety of options" out there. I guess I haven't looked hard enough yet, because I'm not seeing them. Do you have any suggestions? - kajigga On Sep 30, 4:10 pm, "James

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-30 Thread James Bennett
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, kajigga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just come across this Django branch called "RowLevelPermission". > http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RowLevelPermissions. I have yet to > try it out. Don't bother; it's dead as a doornail and has been for quite a long

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-30 Thread kajigga
I'm not sure exactly how to proceed myself. I am very pleased with Django in general, but not having ready to use object-level permissions is driving me nuts. I realize that django was designed with a slightly different view point, but there must be something out there to make it easier.

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-30 Thread Roman Chyla
I am planning to use it together with django - but not for the django site, as a general permission system for digital documents. Using spiff-guard for the backend, and django as an interface to set up the rules. But I haven't really started putting them together, maybe you have clearer ideas

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-30 Thread kajigga
> It seems to me that lot of developers are opting for auth backend - > doing things outside Django. I was looking into phpGACL then I > foundhttp://code.google.com/p/spiff-guard/which is a sort of a similar > project in python. > Have you had any success in using spiff guard with django? I

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-13 Thread rca
> Thanks for your answer, Malcolm, > > I was refering to the > branchhttp://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches/per-object-perm... > which (according to the wiki) appeared to be almost ready for > inclusion in the > main branch of 0.96. To me, this always seemed to be the most

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-12 Thread dadapapa
> > I was wondering if per-object-level (aka row-level) permissions have > > been included into this release. > > if not, is there any plan to include > > them, > > You say "them" as if there's an existing working addition to Django that > supports this and is in some way the obviously correct

Re: status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-10 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 08:43 -0700, dadapapa wrote: > Hi, > > great to see the release of version 1.0 !!! > I was wondering if per-object-level (aka row-level) permissions have > been included into this release. There was never any expectation that there would be anything like this included.

status of per-object-level permission

2008-09-10 Thread dadapapa
Hi, great to see the release of version 1.0 !!! I was wondering if per-object-level (aka row-level) permissions have been included into this release. if not, is there any plan to include them, or is there any work-around/third-party project that works together with the new version? thanks! -