Committed to CVS HEAD. I had to hand-merge the patch because your email client line-wrapped the diff. It'll go live in the next web site update.
- Dan "Tellman, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's a patch modifying the documentation. Feel free to edit, as you see > fit. > > Thanks, > --Ed > > Index: client.xml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvspublic/xml-rpc/xdocs/client.xml,v > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -u -r1.3 client.xml > --- client.xml 7 Nov 2001 12:46:34 -0000 1.3 > +++ client.xml 3 Dec 2002 18:07:23 -0000 > @@ -17,10 +17,15 @@ > the standard Java API</li> > <li><a > href="/xmlrpc/apidocs/org/apache//xmlrpc/XmlRpcClientLite.html">org.apache.x > mlrpc.XmlRpcClientLite</a> provides its own lightweight > HTTP client implementation.</li></ul> > - <p>XmlRpcClientLite is usually faster, but if you need full HTTP > support > - (e.g. Proxies, Redirect etc), you should use XmlRpcClient.Both client > - classes provide the same interface, which includes > - methods for synchronous and asynchronous calls. > + > + <p>If you need full HTTP support (e.g. Proxies, Redirect etc), > + you should use XmlRpcClient. If you don't need full HTTP > + support and are concerned about performance, you should > + experiment with both XmlRpcClient and XmlRpcClientLite. On some > + platforms XmlRpcClient may be faster, while on others > + XmlRpcClientLite may be faster. Both client classes provide the > + same interface, which includes methods for synchronous and > + asynchronous calls. > </p> > </section> > <section name="Synchronous XML-RPC Calls"> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: TCP no-delay option > > > "Tellman, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I also noticed with my JVM and operating system XmlRpcClient seems > > to be about twice as fast as XmlRpcClientLite. Perhaps the > > documentation could be modified to indicate that you should try both > > and use the one that works best in your environment. > > Sounds like a good change. Up to writing a second patch? Look in the > xml-rpc/xdocs/ directory for the appropriate XML document to tweak. > > - Dan > > -------------------- > This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not > the intended recipient, delete this message. If you are not the intended > recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on > this message is strictly prohibited. > -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
