Ryan Hoegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daniel Rall wrote:
> 
> >Sounds like I'm not the only outsider interested in this code!  How
> >about a short-lived CLIENT_REFACTORING branch in CVS?  We could give
> >Ryan commit access, and you guys could proceed with the development
> >from here on out in ASF CVS.  Everyone would be free to comment, and
> >we can merge into the mainline when you think things are ready.  I'd
> >be happy to help with any CVS/branching/merging issues.  Thoughts?
> >
> Well we are having a bit of a feature creep here.  It is no longer
> just CLIENT_REFACTORING as we are looking at abstracting the transport
> layer for the XmlRpcServer code as well.  I would be interested in
> having this code up in CVS somewhere, although I've never worked with
> CVS branches before.

Working with branches mostly involves appending -rBRANCH_NAME to your
cvs checkout and update commands.  Eventually, you learn how to use
update -j to merge branches together.

> Another thing I'm not sure about is design documentation.  Sometimes
> it helps me to draw up larger refactorings like this one in quasi-UML
> so I can see the bigger picture.  If I do this, do I store the
> .VSD/.PNGs in CVS somewhere?  Where?  It would be nice to have them as
> a resource when we are talking over some of the design decisions we
> are making.

Yes, they should live in the repository, possibly under xdocs/
(assuming they have associated content).
-- 

Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to