Thank you for your reply. I have added some comments in-line.
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:42 AM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> It seems like this draft says that the indicated MRDS overrides the EDNS
> BUFSIZE value. This seems likely to create problems if the MRDS value
> could be set by a lower layer in
: Sunday, April 28, 2024 5:02 PM
To: DNSOP
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-heard-dnsop-udp-opt-large-dns-responses-00.txt
Greetings, TSVWG currently has the document "Transport Options for UDP" (https:
//datatracker. ietf. org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options)
Greetings,
TSVWG currently has the document "Transport Options for UDP" (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options) in
Working Group Last Call. It includes a capability to fragment datagrams at
the UDP layer rather than the IP layer, and one of the use cases that has
