On 13/08/2012 02:19, deannel...@aol.com wrote:
Paul,
I've used oXygenXML before and if you can afford it, it will
accelerate your content development. However, if you need a cheap
(free) editor with OK XML support, use Eclipse which has XML support
and a spell checker.
I think youve missed
On 08/13/2012 09:14 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 13/08/2012 02:19, deannel...@aol.com wrote:
Paul,
I've used oXygenXML before and if you can afford it, it will
accelerate your content development. However, if you need a cheap
(free) editor with OK XML support, use Eclipse which has XML support
and
On 13/08/2012 09:49, DaveP wrote:
On 08/13/2012 09:14 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 13/08/2012 02:19, deannel...@aol.com wrote:
Paul,
I've used oXygenXML before and if you can afford it, it will
accelerate your content development. However, if you need a cheap
(free) editor with OK XML support,
Hi Paul,
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:05:41 +0100
Paul Taylor paul_t...@fastmail.fm wrote:
In a previous project I used docbook 4 to create help text for an
application which I then used it to generate html and Javahelp. The
generation worked very well but I found it very difficult writing the
Besides the ones already mentioned:
XMLMind: http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/
Haven't used it myself, though.
-Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands,
AFAIK, OpenOffice 3.3.0 can save your documents in docbook format.
On 13 Αυγ 2012, at 1:05 , Paul Taylor paul_t...@fastmail.fm wrote:
In a previous project I used docbook 4 to create help text for an application
which I then used it to generate html and Javahelp. The generation worked
very
Am Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gregory Papangeles schrieb
AFAIK, OpenOffice 3.3.0 can save your documents in docbook format.
But it is not valid :-((
Heinz
--
Buchsatz für Autoren. Vom Manuskript zum Buch www.pahlke-online.de
Bücher abseits des Mainstreams www.buchentdeckungen.de
On 13/08/2012 12:31, Heinz W. Pahlke wrote:
Am Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gregory Papangeles schrieb
AFAIK, OpenOffice 3.3.0 can save your documents in docbook format.
But it is not valid :-((
Heinz
Just tried it, and its Docbook 4 rather than Docbook 5 :(
But not sure its invalid.
Paul
You're correct Paul. However, even the WYSIWYG tools mentioned do not give
you true WYSIWYGness like Word will give you. Its more of a rough
approximation. It because of the nature of divorcing the content from the
style
(especially in the FO generation).
But if rough approximation is
On 08/12/2012 05:01 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
Can docbook me used to create OSX Help books ?
Hi Paul,
The DocBook xsls can create HTML out of the box. I haven't looked at OS
X Help in years, but IIRC, it's just html with some metadata added to
the head to cause the topic to appear in the right
On 08/13/2012 11:13 AM, David Cramer wrote:
On 08/12/2012 05:01 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
Alternatively, you could hire Bob or another consultant to prepare the
customization layer for you.
Should have included this link as well:
http://wiki.docbook.org/DocBookConsultancy
David
On 13/08/2012 14:17, deannel...@aol.com wrote:
You're correct Paul. However, even the WYSIWYG tools mentioned do not
give you true WYSIWYGness like Word will give you. Its more of a rough
approximation. It because of the nature of divorcing the content from
the style (especially in the FO
On 13/08/2012 17:13, David Cramer wrote:
On 08/12/2012 05:01 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
Can docbook me used to create OSX Help books ?
Hi Paul,
The DocBook xsls can create HTML out of the box. I haven't looked at OS
X Help in years, but IIRC, it's just html with some metadata added to
the head to
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:21:55 +0100, Paul Taylor paul_t...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Im giving Oxygen a go, found it a bit difficult to use at first but now
getting the hang of it.
One advantage is does seem to have is not only can you work with docbook
xml its also setup to generate html/pdf
On 8/12/2012 5:10 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 12/08/2012 23:41, Richard Hamilton wrote:
There are a bunch of very good visual editors out there that will
handle DocBook. The one I know best is Oxygen
(http://www.oxygenxml.com/), which works very well with DocBook.
Goodness, this product is
I have been using the free version of Serna. It is the only app which
support XInclude AFAIK.
I used then the docboox 4.x - docbook 5 converter since serna only
support docbook 4.x
http://www.syntext.com/products/serna-free/
HTH
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Paul Taylor
On 8/12/2012 4:41 PM, Richard Hamilton wrote:
There are a bunch of very good visual editors out there that will
handle DocBook. The one I know best is Oxygen
(http://www.oxygenxml.com/), which works very well with DocBook.
The last time I tried opening one of my DocBook manuals with it
Kind of.
If you like me use a master file with XInclude:s it takes
a trick to get Oxygens to resolve all references and then it
works
really well. This trick has been available for quite some
time/versions - but it is not obvious.
You have to add all includes as
files in the validation
On 08/13/2012 12:07 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I have been using the free version of Serna. It is the only app which
support XInclude AFAIK.
I used then the docboox 4.x - docbook 5 converter since serna only
support docbook 4.x
http://www.syntext.com/products/serna-free/
There's a
On 8/12/12, Paul Taylor paul_t...@fastmail.fm wrote:
In a previous project I used docbook 4 to create help text for an
application which I then used it to generate html and Javahelp. The
generation worked very well but I found it very difficult writing the
help text embedded within the docbook
On 13/08/2012 18:04, Warren Young wrote:
On 8/12/2012 5:10 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 12/08/2012 23:41, Richard Hamilton wrote:
There are a bunch of very good visual editors out there that will
handle DocBook. The one I know best is Oxygen
(http://www.oxygenxml.com/), which works very well
I don't understand this xinclude problem with oxygen. Oxygen has been
handling my xincludes, and nested xincludes, seamlessly from versions
around 7 or 8 at least. There was a base problem with the earlier
versions (back to v.2 in my experience) - see this list about 5 or 6
years ago which
On 13.8.2012 21:00, Jeff Chimene wrote:
Not exactly the answer you're looking for, but to hijack the thead -
have HTML 5 + CSS3 sufficiently advanced the art that WYSIWYGness can
be achieved?
Sure, for example http://xopus.com/
--
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:05:29 +0200, Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote:
On 13.8.2012 21:00, Jeff Chimene wrote:
Not exactly the answer you're looking for, but to hijack the thead -
have HTML 5 + CSS3 sufficiently advanced the art that WYSIWYGness can
be achieved?
Sure, for example
24 matches
Mail list logo
