quality, no matter the technical content of
the document.
--Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Ristic [mailto:ivan.ris...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:26 AM
To: Giuseppe Bonelli
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [docbook-apps] InDesign typography advantage
: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:26 AM
To: Giuseppe Bonelli
Cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [docbook-apps] InDesign typography advantage [Was: Re: [docbook-
apps] DocBook and InDesign]
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Giuseppe Bonelli
peppo.bone...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Hi
Tim Arnold wrote:
I can't imagine someone needing higher typographic quality than that.
Wouldn't that bypass the problem of fo, indesign, antennahouse et
al.? In my experience the DBLaTeX workflow is very high quality, no
matter the technical content of the document.
TeX as well FO work in
FYI: Nice overview of InDesign capabilities:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/238960/Adobe-InDesign-InDepth-Typography
Some of them aren't available even in TeX. Many of them are patented.
Lucky are those who can't recognize the difference ;-)
Unfortunately I can.
Regards,
Jan
I've always been curious as to the possibility of 'finishing off'
a paper output in a layout environment. InDesign is very popular
with publishers and hence makes a fair target.
Is there any way the docbook xsl-fo output could help users of indesign
to do this 'finishing off'?
Not having used
Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote:
TeX as well FO work in batch mode -- you can't interactively fiddle with
details like line and page breaks and object placement and instantly see
changes on-screen. This necessary especially for document with more
artistic design.
There are LaTeX editors that
