Jean Weber wrote
The existing user guides are licensed the same as the OOo guides they were
derived from, and the templates include this licensing information on the
Copyright page (GPL and CC-BY dual license).
Note that GPL applied to documentation is void, so it may as well be
removed.
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:37:50 -0800 (PST)
yecril71pl giecr...@stegny.2a.pl wrote:
Jean Weber wrote
The existing user guides are licensed the same as the OOo
guides they were derived from, and the templates include this
licensing information on the Copyright page (GPL and CC-BY
wrote:
From: Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 7 February, 2012, 18:33
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:37:50 -0800 (PST)
yecril71pl giecr...@stegny.2a.pl wrote
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 7 February, 2012, 18:33
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:37:50 -0800 (PST)
yecril71pl giecr...@stegny.2a.pl wrote:
Jean Weber wrote
The existing user guides
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/11/11 22:30, italovignoli wrote:
- before deciding to use CC BY-NC-SA for all my licensed documents (mostly
presentations).
Most of the lawsuits involving CC Licenses have involved the meaning of
the CC-BY-NC-SA license.
Look at the
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 30 November, 2011, 16:06
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/11/11 22:30, italovignoli wrote:
- before deciding to use CC BY-NC-SA for all my licensed
toki.kantoor wrote
Look at the difference of opinion expressed by the Creative Commons
Foundation, MIT, and the Dutch Collection Society on what that license
means, grants, permits, and prohibits.
I do not think that national collection companies represent a good
example here, as they
Jean Weber wrote
On the documentation list, I proposed changing the license for NEW
docs from the legacy licensing (carried over from the OOo user guides
that were revised for LO) to a different license. [snip]
I have gone though the entire thread, and I have both a couple of things to
Hi :)
I think Alex's objections have been cleared away by Dennis's clarifications
so i suspect that Alex might well be willing to contribute under
dual-licensing. As i understand it the objection was something to do with
individuals having to sign an agreement with Apache but Dennis said that
Hi :)
Do. Please ignore my lengthy previous email!
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 27/11/11, Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
To: documentation
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 18:20, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like it is best to stick with a Creative Commons license only for LO
with the author(s) having the rights to reassign
]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 03:46
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
Hi Jean,
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 09:33:06 schrieb Jean Weber:
[ ... ]
I'll reiterate my comment in another note that if someone (you
Message-
From: Andreas Mantke [mailto:ma...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 03:46
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
Hi Jean,
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 09:33:06 schrieb Jean Weber
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 22:18:33 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Reassignment is different than adding a license or providing the material
under an additional/different license.
Reassignment is about copyright. Let's not go there.
that would something that would not work in some
is to be made. In an Apache release, that will be looked for
and honored.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Mantke [mailto:ma...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 03:46
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 18:20, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like it is best to stick with a Creative Commons license only for LO
with the author(s) having the rights to reassign to others
team that is the
contributor?
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sat, 26/11/11, Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday
-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 26 November, 2011, 14:16
Le 25/11/11 20:01, Jean Weber a écrit :
Hi Jean,
The existing user guides are licensed the same as the OOo guides they were
derived from, and the templates include
licensing under ALv2 are not contributions to
any Apache project.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Thurgood [mailto:alex.thurg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 06:17
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing
of any origin. Such cases have arisen.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Thurgood [mailto:alex.thurg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 07:41
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
Le 26/11/11
: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
Hi :)
Ahh, i thought that when the team publishes a document the individuals CC by
SA licence is then re-licensed under a new CC by SA licence as the original
licence allows?
Also, Hey that's not my glass!!! Mine was bigger
Given that I'm proposing a change to put new docs into the license preferred by
LO, I don't see the point in taking up the Board's time. I think Tom covered
this well in his note. But I see you have already contacted them...
--Jean
On Sunday, November 27, 2011, David Nelson
Thurgood [mailto:alex.thurg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 14:35
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: Licensing for NEW documents
Le 26/11/2011 20:15, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
Hi Dennis,
There is absolutely no requirement to file
Le 27/11/2011 03:25, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
Hi Dennis,
Thank you for your comprehensive answer, it certainly clears up a few
things for me, even though I'm sticking to my original position of not
wishing to dual-license any new work I might produce within the
framework of the
24 matches
Mail list logo
