Re: [Dovecot] Received Date vs Date Header

2007-12-01 Thread Nikolay Shopik
On 01.12.2007 4:03, Jeff Grossman wrote: I am trying to figure out why my mail clients are not correctly showing me the received date versus the date header date. I am using Dovecot 1.1B9. Here is a copy of the rawlog from Dovecot when I started up the client. Is Dovecot supposed to be

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.Beta9 deliver problem: Unknown mail storage driver raw

2007-12-01 Thread ja nein
Hi Velko, I recently hit the same problem. You have to add raw storage driver to your compile options, meaning --with-storages=maildir,mbox,dbox,raw,cydir, that will do the trick. Maybe it would be good to update the description of available storage drivers in configure script. Regards,

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1.Beta9 deliver problem: Unknown mail storage driver raw

2007-12-01 Thread Velko Ivanov
ja nein wrote: Hi Velko, I recently hit the same problem. You have to add raw storage driver to your compile options, meaning --with-storages=maildir,mbox,dbox,raw,cydir, that will do the trick. Many thanks, that fixed it :) Maybe it would be good to update the description of available

Re: [Dovecot] locking strategies?

2007-12-01 Thread Charles Marcus
On 11/30/2007, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote Creek Consulting at Cisco) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: You had to ask that...we're still on 0.99, Ouch... we had tons of problems on 0.99 with occasional random mbox file corruption requiriung manual editing of the mbox file to correct it

Re: [Dovecot] Received Date vs Date Header

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Grossman
Nikolay Shopik wrote: On 01.12.2007 4:03, Jeff Grossman wrote: * 19 FETCH (UID 7607 RFC822.SIZE 4590 FLAGS (\Recent) BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (FROM TO CC SUBJECT DATE MESSAGE-ID PRIORITY X-PRIORITY REFERENCES NEWSGROUPS IN-REPLY-TO CONTENT-TYPE)] {353} Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:25:23 -0800

Re: [Dovecot] locking strategies?

2007-12-01 Thread Bill Cole
At 7:04 PM -0500 11/30/07, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote Creek Consulting at Cisco) wrote: You had to ask that...we're still on 0.99, I'm not sure that holding to a strategy of Embracing 0.99 is a wise decision to admit to in a public forum under your own name or in any way traceable to

[Dovecot] namespaces, shared mailboxes

2007-12-01 Thread Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth
Hi! I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear like 'Shared/mailboxname' to the clients. Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept one thing: Mail clients (only tested with Thunderbird) won't allow to put mails directly in

[Dovecot] Quick fix for nfs-workarounds.c

2007-12-01 Thread Dean Brooks
Hi, Under Solaris 8, the rmdir() command returns EEXIST instead of ENOTEMPTY if an rmdir() is attempted on a directory with files still in it. Dovecot 1.1beta9 currently gives tons of errors in the logfile as a result of the code not checking for the right error value. The function

[Dovecot] Dirsize quotas with 1.1beta9

2007-12-01 Thread Dean Brooks
Hi, Anyone able to get 'dirsize' quotas to work properly under 1.1beta9? I can get them to reflect the size of the INBOX properly, but it never seems to be adding up the size of the files in the folder directory itself. I'll keep hammering away at it if others are able to use dirsize with no

Re: [Dovecot] Updated v1.1 and summer plans

2007-12-01 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 18:56 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: I don't see any mention of support for SiS (single-instance-storage) as discussed previously on the list, even for upcoming 1.2/2.0 Did this fall through a crack? Or did you decide it was going to be too difficult for the time being?