* Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com:
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la route add etc?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de)
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
You don't have to, you could simply nullroute the source IPs :)
By having fail2ban manipulate the routing table a-la route add
etc?
route add *host* reject
yes, something like that.
Understood. I sorta like this idea. I will give
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Diego Liziero diego...@gmail.com wrote:
Dovecot 1.1.7 is running so smoothly that I gave up checking its log
files daily. :)
I've just had a look, and among the usual
IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox Sent UID xx got too little data: xx vs xx
messages (that
Heh - I solve it.
To make it compile in FreeBSD you need to:
cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
make extract
mkdir work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys
locate sysmacros.h
cp /your/path/to/sysmacros.h work/dovecot-1.1.*/sys/
patch it as sayd at wiki.
And then all work well.
I update wiki now.
Hello all.
I try to
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Or does it make more sense to try another kernel first?
I guess that could also help.
I started testing this with another kernel (2.6.26-6.slh.1-sidux-686).
Until now (the last 15 hours) no such failing imap process did show up.
So I guess it happens with 2.6.27
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:33 +0100, Arno Wald wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Or does it make more sense to try another kernel first?
I guess that could also help.
I started testing this with another kernel (2.6.26-6.slh.1-sidux-686).
Until now (the last 15 hours) no such failing imap
Yarema, do you have any thoughts on this?
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:54 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
I'd rather say this is a bug in the FreeBSD ports. If you compiled
Dovecot directly from sources you wouldn't have had this problem.
Well may be. But:
..
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 21:48 -0800, badeguruji wrote:
Hello,
How can i fine tune dovecot for less then 10 users? or is there no need?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning lists some tuning settings.
But the defaults should work fine with small installations.
Also, is there any smtp
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 12:56 +0100, Diederick van Dijk wrote:
namespace:
type: shared
separator: /
prefix: Shared/%%u/
location: maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u
list: yes
subscriptions: yes
Looks ok.
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
The other guy who also had a problem was using 2.6.27. If the 3rd guy
also replies that he's using 2.6.27 then that's pretty clearly the
problem. Might be worth asking about in Linux kernel mailing list.
We've had something similar happen on 2.6.24. Over time processes would
take more and more
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:14 +0100, Antonio Casado Rodríguez wrote:
Hi all, I have seen this in log:
dovecot: Dec 03 06:12:57 Error: IMAP(maurirrr): file
mail-index-view-sync.c: line 666 (mail_index_view_sync_end): asser
tion failed: (view-log_file_offset = view-map-hdr.log_file_int_offset)
Cor Bosman wrote:
It seemed to be NFS related in our case.
Is your Maildir directory mounted via NFS?
I am using NFS-mounts, but not in connection with dovecot.
Greetings,
Arno
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 17:49 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
While researching a possible bug in our custom-made Maildir++ expiration
script, I found the following in src/plugins/quota/quota-maildir.c.
| static const char *
| maildir_list_next(struct maildir_list_context *ctx, time_t *mtime_r)
|
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
Hoards of little prepubescent miscreants won't stop hammering on my
pop3 port and it's driving me bananas.
Although I'm not necessarily arguing against such a feature being
integrated directly into dovecot, you can fix you're problem
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
and I'm not interested in running a firewall on my mail server.
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my
On Sat, December 13, 2008 12:28 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:40 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
In recent days, dovecot's imap processes keep getting stuck. Each
time I check my server (running dovecot 1.1.7) there's a bunch of
imap processes (sometimes 2 of them, sometimes
On Sat, December 13, 2008 5:43 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The other guy who also had a problem was using 2.6.27. If the 3rd guy
also replies that he's using 2.6.27 then that's pretty clearly the
problem. Might be worth asking about in Linux kernel mailing list.
Has anyone reported this over on
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 09:23 -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On Sat, December 13, 2008 5:43 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The other guy who also had a problem was using 2.6.27. If the 3rd guy
also replies that he's using 2.6.27 then that's pretty clearly the
problem. Might be worth asking about
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:17 +0100, Diederick van Dijk wrote:
It doesn't show anything until there are shared mailboxes. Are there
any?
How do I setup these, symlinks ? Or is it in the acl ?
What do you need shared mailboxes for? Perhaps you don't really need
user-shared mailboxes, but
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Wow. Yeah, *some*thing's changed recently to cause this. If I had to
guess, I'd say it's a recent Thunderbird upgrade that's triggering it, as
it's been 2-3 weeks since my last dovecot upgrade.
Some other interesting data points:
* This problem seems to happen when
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my mail server. he didn't say that he doesn't have a
firewall between the mail server and the jungle
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/13/2008, mouss (mo...@netoyen.net) wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my mail server. he didn't say that he doesn't have a
Sorry, this time I've no core file, (I forgot to set ulimit -c
unlimited before starting dovecot)
Regards,
Diego.
---
dovecot: Dec 09 08:26:52 Panic: IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c:
line 590 (mbox_sync_rewrite): assertion failed:
(mails[idx].from_offset == start_offset)
dovecot: Dec 09
I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the return path
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
I can see this has been discussed previously, was just wondering if it's
been fixed in
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 16:45 +0100, Diego Liziero wrote:
Sorry, this time I've no core file, (I forgot to set ulimit -c
unlimited before starting dovecot)
I did several mbox fixes today. Wonder if they could have fixed also
some of these other mbox bugs you've reported?
signature.asc
Pretty much the same thing, just replace rejection with vacation in
my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path?
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the return
path
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM,
The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for bad_MIME
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Pretty much the same thing, just replace rejection with vacation in
my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path?
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15
Are you sure it's because of a missing return path? Sounds more like the
message MIME body is broken. I've never checked if it is..
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:19 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for
bad_MIME
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Wow.. I can't imagine NOT running a mail server without a
firewall...
Different strokes for different folks I guess... :)
He said _ON_ my mail server. he didn't say that he doesn't have a
firewall between the mail server and the jungle
My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered
security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much
stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security is
handled by equipment built and optimized for that job.
It's not like it costs
On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcgu...@neurotica.com) wrote:
My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered
security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much
stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security
is handled by equipment built and
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On Sat, December 13, 2008 12:28 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 13, 2008, at 3:40 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
In recent days, dovecot's imap processes keep getting stuck. Each
time I check my server (running dovecot 1.1.7) there's a bunch of
imap processes
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
I did several mbox fixes today. Wonder if they could have fixed also
some of these other mbox bugs you've reported?
I'm stress-testing current 1.1.x mercurial head with imaptest and with
my account.
So far everything seems
On Dec 13, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered
security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much
stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security
is handled by equipment built and
Wow. Yeah, *some*thing's changed recently to cause this. If I had to
guess, I'd say it's a recent Thunderbird upgrade that's triggering it, as
it's been 2-3 weeks since my last dovecot upgrade.
Some other interesting data points:
* This problem seems to happen when I use Thunderbird (both
Your argument is bogus - see above... again, a basic, properly
configured firewall has negligible impact on pretty much any systems
resources, even ancient ones...
So, yeah, enabling a firewall on a mail server is essentially free,
whether talking impact on system resources, or dollar cost.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yarema, do you have any thoughts on this?
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 13:54 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
I'd rather say this is a bug in the FreeBSD ports. If you compiled
Dovecot directly from sources you wouldn't have had this problem.
Well may be. But:
..
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Has anyone reported this over on LKML yet? Or filed a bug?
I did not yet. First I would like to test my self compiled dovecot
without inotify against 2.6.27. Second I do not know where and how to
report kernel issues. (Also I am a little bit afraid of the whole
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:04 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I'm using maildrop to filter mail like:
xfilter /usr/bin/spamc
xfilter /usr/bin/bogofilter -ep
I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?
deliver can't execute external programs. Typically you'd run these
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 23:55 +0100, Matthias Rieber wrote:
Hi,
I compressed a folder with the following script:
...
for i in *.*.*; do
file $i | grep bzip2 /dev/null 21
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo Compress: $i
cat $i | bzip2 -9
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 16:17 +0200, Ivars Strazdiņš wrote:
Hi there,
are there more trash plugin related updates since v1.1.4 ?
I'm trying to use the plugin with dovecot+mysql according to
documentation and get frequent segfaults
Dec 4 13:58:21 mail kernel: [1605631.688946] imap[16662]:
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 17:40 -0700, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
Somewhere between revision f5554ae61732 (12 days ago) and the release
of 1.2a4 (f53952ac4285; 9 days ago) sorting appears to have broken.
I fixed it yesterday.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 09:33 +0100, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il Tuesday 02 December 2008 18:14:23 Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 15:35 +0100, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
passdb:
driver: checkpassword
args: /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
..
userdb static {
args = uid=89
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:41 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hm. I update ports and try it again:
mx# cd /usr/ports/mail/dovecot
mx# make clean
=== Cleaning for dovecot-1.1.7_1
mx# make extract
=== WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway
=== Found saved configuration
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 04:41 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Oh. You haven't run configure at this point, so it's using config.h
that's distributed in the dovecot tarball and reflects my machine's
configuration. That won't work. I'm surprised it worked even this well.
I wonder why the config.h is
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 17:43 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Hi
For some application we need a master user on our IMAP servers. We use
dovecot 1.1.7 in proxy mode, with proxy_maybe (some mailboxes are on the
proxy itself, others are on remote servers, also running dovecot).
But the proxy
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 02:44 +0300, Zohan wrote:
Dec 9 02:11:15 localhost dovecot: auth(default): ldap(user1,127.0.0.1): pass
search: base=ou=People,dc=example,dc=com scope=subtree
filter=((objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=user1)) fields=uid,nopassword
Do you have a nopassword field in LDAP?
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Jonathan Siegle said the following on 12/2/08 7:16 AM:
When I ran /usr/local/sbin/dovecot, the variable
login_log_format_elements from dovecot.conf was honored. Now when I run
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login from
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:15 +0100, Laurent Blume wrote:
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
I can't really think of why this would have happened. You wouldn't
happen to have a core dump available from this? That would be very
helpful in figuring out why this happened.
I have, here are the pstacks:
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Jonathan Siegle said the following on 12/2/08 7:16 AM:
When I ran /usr/local/sbin/dovecot, the variable
login_log_format_elements from dovecot.conf was honored. Now when
I
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:06 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
On Dec 13, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Jonathan Siegle said the following on 12/2/08 7:16 AM:
When I ran /usr/local/sbin/dovecot, the variable
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 00:10 +0100, Marcin Rzepecki wrote:
Hello,
i have following problems using dovecot-antispam plugin (Dovecot 1.1.3,
FreeBSD 8.0-Current, dovecot-antispam 1.0/1.1)
dovecot-antispam compiled using dspam-exec/mailtrain, with/wo debugging
(i've tried all possibilities)
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:42 -0500, Alan Ferrency wrote:
Hello,
In our configuration, we are using a passdb passwd-file, with
user= directives in each username, and a separate userdb
passwd-file which contains the target usernames for the user=
directives. This works fine, for normal logins
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 15:30 +0300, Andrey Panin wrote:
Hello all,
this patch allows master process to drop more root priveleges under
Solaris. My limited testing shows that code works, but I'm not sure
that defined privilege set is permissive enough for dovecot.
Unfortunately I have no
55 matches
Mail list logo
