I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
http://mailtrust.com/blog
(A bit stupid looking picture, but then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Luigi Rosa wrote:
For the records: the problem was the network filtering (not email filtering!) of
Kaspersky antivirus. Disabling network filtering on port 143 solved this issue.
Switch from STARTTLS to SSL (port 993), KAV6
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org writes:
Bernhard Herzog schrieb:
On 15.01.2009, Sascha Wilde wrote:
But should it just internally convert owner to username when
replying?
From our experience this would be a very good idea. Many clients
recognize the username and handle those ACLs
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:32:41AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
Nicolas KOWALSKI schrieb:
There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directories in ~/Maildir, as written
in the wiki, but instead this .INBOX directory which contains these
'cur', 'new' and 'tmp'.
Is this expected ? Thanks.
Hello everyone,
while I understand (and am glad to see) that the codebase evolved almost
beyond recognition since I submitted it, from a superficial glance over the
present code, I get the impression that it might be better to employ an
additional check along the lines of what I had done in the
Hi Timo,
Hi *,
I just recognized that the new imap-acl plugin in dovecot 1.2 does not
know the obsolete rights 'd' and 'c' when setting. According to RFC
4314 section 2.1.1.:
If a client includes the d right in a rights list, then it MUST be
treated as if the client had included every
Dear All,
I'm having an intermittent problem, with dovecot slowing to a crawl.
Restarting dovecot fixes the problem.
Looking at the maillog, I see loads of these errors
dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files
dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slowing down for now
I reported a bug like this on 23rd Dec last year and Timo replied 8/1
this year. However, I've seen this bug very infrequently and I'm not
sure that you're hitting it - it's more likely that your ulimit -n is
too low - try setting it to around 8192 (defaults to 1024 I think). It
should be around
Hello,
About the INBOX location when using maildir, in the wiki,
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, I can read:
Directory Structure
~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain
the messages for INBOX. The tmp directory is used during delivery, new
messages
Nicolas KOWALSKI schrieb:
Hello,
About the INBOX location when using maildir, in the wiki,
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, I can read:
Directory Structure
~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain
the messages for INBOX. The tmp directory is
Hi all,
as I told earlier, I am installing an email server with
postfix/dovecot/dspam (for now that's all, though some programs may come
later). For now, what works good enough is that I receive mails and spams
are tagged. Dovecot version 1.1.7-r1 compiled from the gentoo depository
with debug.
Hi Sascha,
Sascha Wilde schrieb:
Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org writes:
Bernhard Herzog schrieb:
On 15.01.2009, Sascha Wilde wrote:
But should it just internally convert owner to username when
replying?
From our experience this would be a very good idea. Many clients
recognize
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Jehan Pagès wrote:
TrustedDeliveryAgent /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d %u
UntrustedDeliveryAgent /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d %u
QuarantineAgent /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d %u -m Junk
deliver(recipi...@mydomain.tld):
on 2-5-2009 8:15 PM Timo Sirainen spake the following:
On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
When I finally decide to convert to maildir, will I have to set up
namespaces
during the conversion, or will dovecot figure out where everything is
by itself?
Just adding namespaces
Hi Mark,
taking your advice, I've put ulimit -n 8192 /dev/null 21
into /etc/profile. The problem is horribly intermittent, so it's now just a
question of waiting...
Anyhow, many thanks for the tip - I'll post something to the list if the
problem comes back !
Jake
On Friday 06 February 2009
Are you sure /etc/profile gets read, especially during boot? I'm not
that sure.. Anyway you can verify that the changes took place with:
cat /proc/`pidof dovecot`/limits|grep files
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:07 +, Jake Grimmett wrote:
Hi Mark,
taking your advice, I've put ulimit -n 8192
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 07:19 +0100, mathe...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Timo,
mail.info dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.15 starting up
mail.err dovecot: auth(default): Panic: Leaked file fd 5: dev 0.10
inode 3
This happens only when Dovecot has been configured with --enable-devel-
checks (or was it
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:57:29PM +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
Any idea, anyone ?
Sorry to insist, but I need this setup. Timo ?
--
Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur
hum...@pasteur.fr | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau
Hi Timo / Mark,
Whoops! your right, the profile doesn't get read :(
Another failure was putting this line in /etc/security/limits.conf
dovecot - nofile 8192
Still stuck with Max open files 1024
Until I 'cheated' and put a line into /etc/init.d/dovecot under the
prog=Dovecot
I'm impressed by dovecto and try to upgrade my home system from
wu-imapd running there for last 5 years to dovecot.
It's straghtforward FreeBSD setup with ssl-only auth,
inboxes in /var/mail and user mail under %h/Mail
But I get some strange error:
Fatal: userdb didn't return a home
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 22:40 +0300, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Fatal: userdb didn't return a home directory, but mail location used
it (%h): %h/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
..
passdb:
driver: pam
args: imap
You don't have userdb configured at all, so Dovecot doesn't know the
user's
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 15:20 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
I first connect (in Thunderbird) to dovecot with user 'hummel', then with user
'doveimap'. The following files are created in /path/to/public/ :
-rw--- 1 doveimap doveshared40 Jan 30 14:03 dovecot-acl-list
-rw--- 1 hummel
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:49 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
Hello Timo,
About the dovecot-shared file, the wiki says :
Unless you're using a single UID for all the users, you'll need to have a
dovecot-shared file in each shared maildir. The group and the file
permissions
for new
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 18:43 +0100, Thomas Hummel wrote:
Hello Timo,
In my trials to setup a shared namespace with dovecot-1.1.8/LDAP passdb/userdb
(prefetch)/Maildir, I found out that :
1) ACL are mandatory (at least if the acl plugin is triggered in dovecot.conf)
Am I correct ?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
You don't have userdb configured at all, so Dovecot doesn't know the
user's home directories. Probably helps if you just add:
userdb passwd {
}
inside auth {} block.
Thank you! it helps.
--
Dmitry Samersoff
d...@samersoff.net, http://devnull.samersoff.net
* There will
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 08:42 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
I have considered using the convert plugin, if there are not a lot of
negatives.
I don't know if anyone has really used it to do the conversion, but I
don't see why it wouldn't work. :) The main negative is that it doesn't
preserve
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 12:29 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
I just recognized that the new imap-acl plugin in dovecot 1.2 does not
know the obsolete rights 'd' and 'c' when setting.
..
[0] I don't like the use of static indexes witch imap_acl_letter_map but
currently I wasn't able to decide
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 11:15 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain
the messages for INBOX. The tmp directory is used during delivery, new
messages arrive in new and read shall be moved to cur by the clients.
Right.
But in my
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:15:17PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directories in ~/Maildir, as written
in the wiki, but instead this .INBOX directory which contains these
'cur', 'new' and 'tmp'.
Is this expected ? Thanks.
No, it's not expected. And
Timo,
Everything seems to be working except I can't access one folder:
I have messages below in the log:
dovecot: Feb 06 21:28:04 Error: IMAP(dms):
file_lock_dotlock() failed with mbox file /var/mail/dms: Permission denied
But permissions seems to be OK:
mircat:dovecot#ls -ld /var/mail
At this point I don't think I can do anymore damage to my mail server
but I'd like to know if anyone else is using the pre-built RPM files
from ATrpms before I install them?
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-1.1.11-0_90.el5.i386.rpm
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-sieve-1.1.6-9.el5.i386.rpm
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 21:50 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 03:15:17PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There are no 'cur', 'new' and 'tmp' directories in ~/Maildir, as written
in the wiki, but instead this .INBOX directory which contains these
'cur', 'new' and 'tmp'.
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 00:28 +0300, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Dovecot setup:
mail_uid: smmsp
mail_gid: mail
These settings are overridden by your userdb:
userdb:
driver: passwd
You'll probably rather want to set:
mail_privileged_group = mail
signature.asc
Description: This is a
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
http://mailtrust.com/blog
(A bit stupid looking picture, but then
Congratulations, sounds like a great place to be,
Cor
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
http://mailtrust.com/blog
(A bit stupid
Awesome! Congratulations!
Mike
On Feb 6, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year.
Here's
A bit stupid looking picture
hihi, yes... ;)
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
To: dovecot-n...@dovecot.org
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:58 PM
Subject: [Dovecot-news] I've moved to US
___
Guys,
i m new to dovecot. I m setting up a new mailserver and planning to run
dovecot and postfix of a centos 5.2 box.
I have been reading of quota management from various sources and understand
that mail box quota can be implemented either thru postfix ( with vda patch )
or thru dovecot.
i
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
http://mailtrust.com/blog
(A bit stupid
Timo Sirainen wrote:
So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
Congratulations!! As a former Virginian myself, let me give you a head
start with this exhaustive list of fun things to do in Blacksburg:
1.
I've currently got dovecot running on a Fedora server and I want to move
all my mail to my new server running ubuntu. Both use mbox and I have
IMAP working in both. Can I just copy the ~user/mail directory and
/var/mail/user file and replace them in the new server?
Thanks,
--
Knute
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 09:13, Udo Rader wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk
On 02/06/2009 05:58 PM Timo Sirainen wrote:
I thought about saying this in v1.2.beta1 release annoouncement, but
looks like it'll take a few more days. So I've moved to Blacksburg,
Virginia and I'm now working for Mailtrust the rest of this year. Here's
some talk about it:
On Feb 6, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
Congratulations! Wow, Finland to Blacksburg. That could make for
some interesting 'culture shock' posts.
Actually I find Blacksburg to be very similar to Finland. I haven't
really had any shocks. Just some small annoyances how some things are
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 6, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
Congratulations! Wow, Finland to Blacksburg. That could make for
some interesting 'culture shock' posts.
Actually I find Blacksburg to be very similar to Finland. I haven't
really had any
I don't know what to call what I'm trying to do so I'll explain the
situation.
I had a total complete crash of the Linux-Vserver system that was
hosting a Postfix+Dovecot guest with a three domains and 1-5 accounts
per domain. Lots of mail though.
Before it completely melted down I as able
So I'm looking to do a migration of my IMAP mailboxes, and I'm looking for
the best tool to use. I used to use the uw-mailutil tool, a while ago, but
that was a bit coarse of a tool. More recently I've used imapsync, but that
was giving me some errors. I've sort of tracked those down; but I was
On February 5, 2009 9:59:10 PM +0100 Peter Lindgren
pe...@norrskenkonsult.com wrote:
maildir-sync-index.c:295: warning: `j' might be used uninitialized in
this function
In function maildir_sync_mail_keywords, j is assumed to be initialized to
0 I think. It is used in line 339 in the for
On February 5, 2009 4:14:24 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:59 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
There is a similar warning for mailbox-list-fs-iter.c, but as far as I
can tell the warning is unjustified?
mailbox-list-fs-iter.c:483: warning: `real_path' might be
On Feb 7, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On February 5, 2009 4:14:24 PM -0500 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:59 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
There is a similar warning for mailbox-list-fs-iter.c, but as far
as I
can tell the warning is unjustified?
On Feb 7, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
for (i = j = 0;
removed this warning, and removed my doubts :-)
Should be
for (i = (j = 0);
a = b = ... is not legal, although gcc does accept it.
Really? I've seen a=b=c like code for a long time. But I can't say
exactly where C99
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, Linux Advocate wrote:
i rather not patch postfix and m therefore leaning towards quota via dovecot.
But after reading some posts ,etc, it seems that the information on the
dovecot wiki is inaccurate.
A.Any comments on this?
To which posts are you referring?
B. Am i
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, Neil wrote:
So I'm looking to do a migration of my IMAP mailboxes, and I'm looking for
the best tool to use. I used to use the uw-mailutil tool, a while ago, but
that was a bit coarse of a tool. More recently I've used imapsync, but that
was giving me some errors. I've
On Feb 7, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
for (i = j = 0;
removed this warning, and removed my doubts :-)
Should be
for (i = (j = 0);
a = b = ... is not legal, although gcc does accept it.
Really? I've seen a=b=c like code for a long time. But I can't say
exactly where C99
55 matches
Mail list logo
