Mihamina Rakotomandimby miham...@gulfsat.mg :
Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
We currently run courier POP .
We would like to switch to Dovecot.
I encounter problems when migrating the UIDL
My current proble is UIDL, just for POP:
On courier: On Dovecot:
UIDL
Hi All,
I am new to dovecot so this may be a very easy thing to do.
I need to setup a postfix+dovecot server for a multilocation setup
The rules are very simple
mails to *...@local.example.com send to dovecot
mails to *...@otherlocation.example.com send to smtp:[otherlocation]
But the
On 2010-05-09 2:54 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It's frustrating trying to solve this, to say the least. :( I don't have
enough in depth knowledge of either application to figure this out on my
own.
Hey Stan,
Sorry I can't offer any more help, other than to ask - have you
seen/used the
On 2010-05-10 6:06 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-05-09 2:54 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It's frustrating trying to solve this, to say the least. :( I don't have
enough in depth knowledge of either application to figure this out on my
own.
Hey Stan,
Sorry I can't offer any more help,
Hi
I'am using dovecot with quota_rule stored in mysql user table, and quota
usage stored in mysql dict
## Quota #
dict {
quotadict = mysql:/usr/local/etc/dovecot-quota.conf
}
plugin {
quota = dict:user::proxy::quotadict
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=10%%
On 10.05.2010 13:49, alex wrote:
Everything works as expected, but I have some inconveniences for
domains with large number of mailboxes. Allocating and maintain quota
to every account it's a hard job.
I just want to implement some flexibility for this situations (ex the
first enforcement
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/10/2010 5:06 AM:
On 2010-05-09 2:54 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
It's frustrating trying to solve this, to say the least. :( I don't have
enough in depth knowledge of either application to figure this out on my
own.
Hey Stan,
Sorry I can't offer any more help,
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 17:45, Dennis Guhl d...@dguhl.org wrote:
You can also give the full command here instead a transport name
defined in the master.cf. And you append all parameters directly
behind the command.
So I can do it either way? I would prefer in main.cf if that is sufficient.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:43, Dennis Guhl d...@dguhl.org wrote:
Ubuntu is using dovecot-postfix.conf as the working config file if you
install the package 'dovecot-postfix' from the Ubuntu server team. But
if you install the seperate packages 'dovecot-[common|imapd|pop3d]'
dovecot.conf will
On 2010-05-10 8:48 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I'm thinking at this point that the cause of the problem is that I probably
use Tbird in a way/methodology that the Tbird devs never anticipated, or
discourages. It's seems clear, unfortunately, that their entire mindset is
based on a FAT client
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/10/2010 8:26 AM:
On 2010-05-10 8:48 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I'm thinking at this point that the cause of the problem is that I probably
use Tbird in a way/methodology that the Tbird devs never anticipated, or
discourages. It's seems clear, unfortunately, that
The sample config file has:
# User to use for the process. This user needs access to only user and
# password databases, nothing else. Only shadow and pam authentication
# requires roots, so use something else if possible. Note that passwd
# authentication with BSDs internally accesses
On 2010-05-10 9:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Charles Marcus put forth on 5/10/2010 8:26 AM:
Also, for Tools Account Settings Synchronization Storage,
have you told TBird to delete any messages under the 'To recover
disk space ...' section?
I don't sync messages, so this setting is ignored.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:46:27AM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 17:45, Dennis Guhl d...@dguhl.org wrote:
You can also give the full command here instead a transport name
defined in the master.cf. And you append all parameters directly
behind the command.
So I can
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 09:06:05AM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:43, Dennis Guhl d...@dguhl.org wrote:
Ubuntu is using dovecot-postfix.conf as the working config file if you
install the package 'dovecot-postfix' from the Ubuntu server team. But
if you install the
On Sat Apr 24 12:27:40 EEST 2010, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:14:28PM +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
Hi,
got the following with beta4 while uploading messages from a local
mbox to the dovecot server in my LAN, tested with mutt and sylpheed,
the same action works with
Hello,
Last Saturday i scp the vmail folder from server1 running SLES to
server2 running Debian. Everything went ok and only have a few small
problems, but the one to bring up is that some users cant see their
new emails. The server receives the emails and puts them in their
folder, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen said the following on 09/05/10 21:27:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta5.tar.gz.sig
I don't know if it is an issue linked to the 2.0 proctitle or what
we use Passdb LDAP with authentication binds against an Active Directory
Server. The problem with one of our users seems to be the usage of
double quotes in his password, as the windows-login works:
/var/log/dovecot-info.log
auth(default): Info: ldap(testuser 77.22.xx.xxx): invalid
I'm getting this ...
May 10 12:45:01 eth0 postfix/local[3416]: A788D685F7: to=
x...@.net, relay=local, delay=13, delays=13/0/0/0.03,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: Can't open
log file /var/log/dovecot/error.log: Permission denied )
So I'm looking at
OS: AIX 5.3 with IBM c compiler.
Dovecot revision: 11278:2ead7574bb08
This problem is old for me, I just kept forgetting to report.
Trying to start dovecot and I get:
exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program dovecot because of the following errors:
rtld: 0712-001 Symbol iconv was referenced
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I'm getting this ...
May 10 12:45:01 eth0 postfix/local[3416]: A788D685F7: to=
x...@.net, relay=local, delay=13, delays=13/0/0/0.03,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
Just realized my email was not going to the list.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:20, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
I am using static uids:
mail_uid = vmail
mail_gid = vmail
user = vmail
group = vmail
else it will do what you describe.
I have that, too. But it's not running the
What about your postfix conf..?
mine is set to:
virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:1001
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:42, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2010-05-10 1:59 PM, Romer Ventura wrote:
I had to chmod 777 for it to work..
That's pretty much *never* a reasonable solution.
Absolutely right!
But it's an interim test ... in this case to see what userid
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
What about your postfix conf..?
mine is set to:
virtual_gid_maps = static:1001
virtual_mailbox_base = /srv/mail/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = $mydomain
virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap_users.cf
Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
to get the ones for your system.
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 14:44, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:07, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
I dont know what else.
I tried to chwon postfix:postfix, vmail:vmail, postfix:vmail, vmail:postfix
and none of them worked. I had to go with chmod 777
I believe that is because Postfix is running dovecot/deliver as
Could it be that selinux or apparmor are playing games with you???
just my 2 $cents
Egbert Jan (NL)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+egbert=vandenbussche...@dovecot.org]
Namens Romer Ventura
Verzonden:
I have this in dovecot-postfix.conf:
mail_location =
maildir:/home/mail/dnamesum=%12MLd/dname=%Ld/unamesum=%12MLn/uname=%Ln/mail
Yes, it is excessive, but that's just for testing. The pattern I really
want is less clear for debugging. In postfix/main.cf I have:
mailbox_command =
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:27 -0500
Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com articulated:
Yes, 1001 are the uid and gid in my system, check your /etc/passwd
to get the ones for your system.
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 1:56 PM,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:15, Egbert Jan egb...@vandenbussche.nl wrote:
Could it be that selinux or apparmor are playing games with you???
Good idea to check. But I don't have anything in my apparmor setup for
either postfix or dovecot. I don't know about Romer Ventura's config. I do
know
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
From my 'master.cf' file:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
-f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop}
From 'main.cf' file:
I use dovecot, vpopmail.
I wish to restrict a mail user's login to its mailbox according to its ip
address.
I don't wish other users to be affected .
Namely, for instance, a...@domain.com can login to its mailbox from a few
specific ip addresses but the same user will not able to login from
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:35:15 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
From my 'master.cf' file:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:58, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
See: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
Be sure to read the entire page.
I have a few times. But now I'm getting a bit of a different perspective on
part of it. The parameters are:
-d username: Destination username.
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then
perform a query for it and have dovecot group users by domain, this
way i can have us...@example.net and us...@example.com
Thanks
--
man pipe
${nexthop}
This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
This information is modified by the h flag for
case folding.
Thanks
--
Romer Ventura
On May 10, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 15:25, Jerry
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What does change the format of the username mean?
What i did was to set the mail attribute for each user in AD, then perform
a query for
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:23, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com wrote:
man pipe
${nexthop}
This macro expands to the next-hop hostname.
This information is modified by the h flag for case
folding.
But what is next hop? I don't have any next hop
On Mon, 10 May 2010 17:30:48 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 17:11, Romer Ventura rvent...@h-st.com
wrote:
try using -d ${recipient}, but change the format of the username in
dovecot.conf
What does change the format of the username mean?
I would not have expected this upon implementing sieve. And I really need
to get around this limitation. LDA has no problem writing to these large
mbox files. Why does sieve have a problem with them? This is very odd.
May 10 17:45:04 greer dovecot: deliver(stan): write() failed with mbox file
Apologies for pointing the finger at lda/sieve. After much digging and
Googling I found that the problem actually lies with a Postfix default
setting, specifically:
mailbox_size_limit (default: 5120)
The maximal size of any local(8) individual mailbox or maildir file, or
zero (no
Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com :
My advice is - and no offense
No problem. You're right.
On 2010-05-08 2:09 PM, luben karavelov wrote:
On 8.05.2010 20:57, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Arne K. Haajea...@drlinux.no :
This worked great, and as it preserves flags users did not
45 matches
Mail list logo
