Hi Timo, im getting some director errors.
Dec 13 10:11:25 imapdirector1 dovecot: director: Error: User hash 3608614717 is
being redirected to two hosts: 194.109.26.171 and 194.109.26.141
Dec 13 10:11:25 imapdirector1 dovecot: director: Error: User hash 755231546 is
being redirected to two
On Dec 12, 2010, at 23:26, Javier de Miguel Rodrí guez javierdemig...@us.es
wrote:
My SAN(s) (HP LeftHand Networks) do not support SSD, though. But I have
several LeftHand nodes, some of them with raid5, others with raid 1+0.
Maildirs+indexes are now in raid5, maybe I can separate
El 13/12/10 10:16, Brad Davidson escribió:
On Dec 12, 2010, at 23:26, Javier de Miguel Rodrí guezjavierdemig...@us.es
wrote:
My SAN(s) (HP LeftHand Networks) do not support SSD, though. But I have
several LeftHand nodes, some of them with raid5, others with raid 1+0.
Maildirs+indexes
On 2010-12-13 2:45 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:23:43 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Did you already try deleting the local copy of the Inbox?
The problem has solved. User account was recreated - that helped.
Also, we have this problem with various dovecot (starting from
Charles Marcus wrote:
Also - what version of Thunderbird is this?
I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard drive.
I had it happen
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 06:16:56 -0500
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-13 2:45 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:23:43 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Did you already try deleting the local copy of the Inbox?
The problem has solved. User account was recreated - that helped.
On 2010-12-13 6:24 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard drive.
Bug Number please? Never had that
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:26 +0100, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
We can throw more hardware to this, let's see if using memory-based
indexes (via ramdisk) we get better results. Zlib compression on indexes
should be great for this.
Isn't it possible for Linux to compress the
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 23:05 +0700, a...@test123.ru wrote:
Does anybody know concrete answers? Let's consider IMAP and LDA and forget
POP3.
1. Is migration to dovecot 2.0 good idea if I want to decrease I/O?
That alone makes no difference.
2. Can mdbox help decrease IO?
Hopefully! No one
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 21:08 +0100, Agim Cami wrote:
What will be the right authentication scheme for a mail system with
Microsoft Outlook as client and shadow passwords for Linux system users?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication
Only PLAIN authentication mechanism works for passwords in
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:29 -0500, Tony Pyro wrote:
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 10:51 -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
1) How can I be sure I get a core next time? I think it's because I
run dovecot/imap under a mail uid and didn't have write permission
to the cwd. Any way to verify that was it, and be sure it works?
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 13:14 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
Is there a specific order in which one has to add servers to
director_mail_servers, Let's say I have 20 loadbalanced director servers (I
dont, but for arguments sake). I want to add 5 servers to
director_mail_servers. If I do this by
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:07 -0700, Willie Gillespie wrote:
Thanks for the reply, although I am not sure you understand the
question. I know what I need to do, I just don't know how (syntax to use
in the dovecot configuration file) to change the mail_location on a
per-user basis with the
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:45 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Oops! Config problem. Typing should be second nature by now huh.
..
Dec 10 13:57:57 tr27n12.aset.psu.edu dovecot: imap(tstem38): Panic: file
index-transaction.c: line 71: assertion failed: (box-opened)
What kind of a config problem?
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 16:29 +0100, Harm van Tilborg wrote:
user_query = \
SELECT m.maildir AS home, 1001 AS uid, 1001 AS gid, \
CONCAT('*:bytes=', m.quota, 'M') AS quota_rule, \
'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2 \
There's no need for the quota_rule2 to be here since it's always static
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:54 +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
Not directly. If you don't care about mail_max_userip_connections, you
can force it to ignore the user's IP with some hack:
a) modify source code
Can i wirite a plugin to do this? Or i must modify source.
Can't do via plugin.
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 16:31 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to run the imap-login process from 1.2 against a 2.0 system?
No, they're too different.
On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:45 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Oops! Config problem. Typing should be second nature by now huh.
..
Dec 10 13:57:57 tr27n12.aset.psu.edu dovecot: imap(tstem38): Panic: file
index-transaction.c: line 71: assertion
On 12/13/2010 04:36 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-13 6:24 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
I'm going to guess that it's Thunderbird 3.x. It has an issue where
sometimes it (somehow) decides that it needs to keep downloading all the
messages over and over again until it fills the user's hard
I'm trying to set up SMTP authentication on my server and am getting an
authentication failed error. My client is set up to automatically
select authentication method and tries CRAM_MD5. The
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL suggests passdb
pam and userdb passwd -- is it
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:39:50 -0500
Ted To rainexpec...@theo.to articulated:
I'm trying to set up SMTP authentication on my server and am getting
an authentication failed error. My client is set up to automatically
select authentication method and tries CRAM_MD5. The
On 13.12.2010, at 15.39, Ted To wrote:
I'm trying to set up SMTP authentication on my server and am getting an
authentication failed error. My client is set up to automatically
select authentication method and tries CRAM_MD5. The
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL suggests
I got around to trying the 0.2.2 managesieve listener and it's not
working for me. As soon as the client authenticates, the connection
is closed and the following is logged on the server:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace
On 13.12.2010, at 17.01, Tom Talpey wrote:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace 'Mobile/': Unknown mail storage driver
virtual
I do have such a virtual namespace defined in dovecot.conf, obviously,
and it works fine with
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:27 +
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
CRAM-MD5 is incompatible with PAM.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
After reconfiguring the client to use LOGIN rather than CRAM-MD5, I
still get the following error: http://pastebin.com/bnhxVajc.
On Mon, 13
On 13.12.2010, at 17.08, Ted To wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:27 +
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
CRAM-MD5 is incompatible with PAM.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
After reconfiguring the client to use LOGIN rather than CRAM-MD5, I
still get the following
Hi,
On 13/12/10 08:05 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:07 -0700, Willie Gillespie wrote:
Thanks for the reply, although I am not sure you understand the
question. I know what I need to do, I just don't know how (syntax to use
in the dovecot configuration file) to change the
On 13.12.2010, at 17.30, Patrick McLean wrote:
I just did that, and things seem to be _mostly_ working. It seems that
deliver/dovecot-lda is ignoring the extra fields parameter (I am using
the user's .forward file to invoke the lda). It keeps trying to deliver
to the Maildir rather than the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:15:00 +
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 13.12.2010, at 17.08, Ted To wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:50:27 +
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
CRAM-MD5 is incompatible with PAM.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms
After
On 12/13/2010 12:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 13.12.2010, at 17.01, Tom Talpey wrote:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace 'Mobile/': Unknown mail storage driver virtual
I do have such a virtual namespace defined in
On 13.12.2010, at 17.41, Ted To wrote:
Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[26253]: warning: SASL
authentication problem: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: No
such file or directory Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[26253]:
warning: SASL authentication problem: unable to open Berkeley
On 12/12/2010 00:49, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Since Javier is looking for ways to decrease I/O load on the SAN, not
necessarily increase Dovecot performance, I think putting the index
files on a ramdisk is best thing to try first. It may not be a silver
bullet. If he's still got spare memory
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:48:03 +
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 13.12.2010, at 17.41, Ted To wrote:
Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo postfix/smtpd[26253]: warning: SASL
authentication problem: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: No
such file or directory Dec 13 12:36:57 kahlo
New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound
searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8:
Yep. It's been in TODO for a while.
OK, thanks -- didn't think to look there. I see that it's a pretty long list.
I'll look for a workaround unless you think a
Javier de Miguel Rodríguez put forth on 12/13/2010 1:26 AM:
Sadly, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 does not support natively XFS. I
can install it via CentosPlus, but we need Red Hat support if somethings
goes VERY wrong. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 supports XFS (and gives me
dovecot 2.0), but
Dec 14 00:15:54 vm dovecot: IMAP(#...@): Maildir filename has wrong
W value:
/var/vmail/#//cur/#.M###.??..??.??,S=4951,W=5057:2,RSa
Dear Dovecot elite,
This morning I woke up to find my mail server hard disk controller had
gone crazy and decided to corrupt my file
I am attempting to test out dovecot on a server on a separate IP address from
the live, functioning UW-IMAP. I am having mixed results with dovecot. An
entirely new account that's never been used with UW-IMAP seems to work fine,
but that's really not the point of the exercise.
If I try
On Dec 13, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
I am attempting to test out dovecot on a server on a separate IP
address from the live, functioning UW-IMAP. I am having mixed
results with dovecot. An entirely new account that's never been used
with UW-IMAP seems to work fine, but that's
39 matches
Mail list logo
