Thank you Jeremy and Bernardo.
Adding cert verification is something I'll have to delve into. Also
possibly pushing the replication through the VPN.
It's been a while since I last setup my replication pair - everything's
been working smoothly so I've forgotten some of the key items.
I currently have two servers running with synchronization that I've been
very happy with. However, I'm seeing the following in my logs recently:
May 12 15:45:58 cloud1 dovecot: doveadm(194.165.16.78): Error: doveadm
client not compatible with this server (mixed old and new binaries?)
May 13
Just upgraded to a new Solr, so I did a full re-index. Saw some of
these friendly messages:
doveadm(csm...@amfes.com): Error:
zlib.read(/var/mail/amfes.com/csmith/mdbox/storage/m.20): gz trailer has
wrong CRC value at 28579617
doveadm(csm...@amfes.com): Error:
On 2/25/2014 10:50 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Just upgraded to a new Solr, so I did a full re-index. Saw some of
these friendly messages:
doveadm(csm...@amfes.com): Error:
zlib.read(/var/mail/amfes.com/csmith/mdbox/storage/m.20): gz trailer
has wrong CRC value at 28579617
doveadm(csm
On 3/8/2013 12:31 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
see
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/0245/inotify-fd-why-is-the-limit-per-user-id-and-not-per-process
Dovecot needs one inotify entity per IDLE, maybe more for internal
purposes. So in theory, you will need: max number of simultaneous
Maybe I have multiple problems - dunno.
I've started seeing the following log lines:
Mar 7 07:46:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmil...@amfes.com): Warning: Inotify
instance limit for user 5000 (UID vmail) exceeded, disabling. Increase
/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
max_user_instances is
On 11/29/2012 12:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 29.11.2012, at 18.06, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/28/2012 10:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 29.11.2012, at 7.47, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
doveadm fetch text -u amil...@amfes.com mailbox-guid
a47e4e264aa1c94cc3513bc41c5f uid 12891
On 11/29/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I (hopefully) fixed my config - put 'zlib' into 10-mail.conf and
removed it from the others. Re-indexing is now good on some mailboxes
that were broken before - but I still have a fault on others.
Using the tcpflow dump, I found a couple bad
Trying to clean up the last of the corruption caused by my own
stupidity. I now have two mailboxes for one user that give errors such as:
doveadm(f...@amfes.com): Error:
zlib.read(/var/mail/amfes.com/fax/mdbox/storage/m.9): gz trailer has
wrong CRC value at 20065618
doveadm(f...@amfes.com):
On 11/29/2012 10:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 30.11.2012, at 7.57, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/29/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I (hopefully) fixed my config - put 'zlib' into 10-mail.conf and removed it
from the others. Re-indexing is now good on some mailboxes that were broken
On 11/27/2012 6:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.11.2012, at 4.43, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I did go through the code looking for that a few times already but didn't
notice anything. I went through it once more, and finally found the problem. :)
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev
On 11/28/2012 12:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.11.2012, at 10.50, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/27/2012 6:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.11.2012, at 4.43, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I did go through the code looking for that a few times already but didn't
notice anything. I went
On 11/28/2012 8:49 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/28/2012 12:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.11.2012, at 10.50, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/27/2012 6:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.11.2012, at 4.43, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I did go through the code looking for that a few times
On 11/26/2012 10:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR,
code 8))
at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1011144,197790]
On 11/27/2012 7:28 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/26/2012 10:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character
((CTRL-CHAR, code 8
On 11/27/2012 1:07 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.11.2012, at 17.38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/27/2012 7:28 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/26/2012 10:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these
On 11/18/2012 6:57 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Sat Nov 17 2012, Daniel L. Miller dmiller-AT-amfes.com wrote:
On 11/16/2012 12:58 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Thu Nov 15 2012, Daniel L. Miller dmiller-AT-amfes.com wrote:
On 11/14/2012 6:52 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
Does anyone have an answer
On 11/16/2012 12:58 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Thu Nov 15 2012, Daniel L. Miller dmiller-AT-amfes.com wrote:
On 11/14/2012 6:52 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
Does anyone have an answer to this question? Should I simply issue an
IMAP search command, or is there a better way?
Put this in a cron
On 11/14/2012 6:52 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
Does anyone have an answer to this question? Should I simply issue an
IMAP search command, or is there a better way?
Put this in a cron script:
doveadm search -A text zyxabcxyz /dev/null
That will perform a search through every mailbox on the
On 11/6/2012 12:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.11.2012, at 17.26, Ed W wrote:
On 05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
This also provides a nice abstraction to OpenSSL, making it again
possible to implement other backends like GnuTLS
On 2012-11-08 03:45, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-11-07 10:14
AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
No, fts-lucene and fts-solr
are separate backends. But I do have some small plans to add a few more
features to fts-solr.
Thanks again Timo, but one last
follow-up...
According to the
On 2012-11-11 17:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.11.2012 02:11,
schrieb Daniel L. Miller:
On 11/6/2012 12:30 PM, Timo Sirainen
wrote:
On 6.11.2012, at 17.26, Ed W wrote:
On
05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-05
at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: This also
On 31.10.2012 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 30.10.2012, at
17.00, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm compiling as I normally do. The
config line for Dovecot is: configure --with-ldap --with-ssl
--with-bzlib --with-zlib --with-stemmer --with-lucene --with-ldap
followed by make make install
On 31.10.2012 21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 31.10.2012
04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed
by: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/7d931927e4ac [1][1]
You
could also do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the
installed
dovecot-config
On 31.10.2012 21:23, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 31.10.2012
21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 31.10.2012
04:26, Timo
Sirainen wrote:
I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed
could also
do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the
installed
dovecot-config and
-left:#1010ff
On 31.10.2012 21:23, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 31.10.2012
21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 31.10.2012
04:26, Timo
Sirainen wrote:
I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed
could also
do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the
installed
dovecot-config and
-left:#1010ff
I'm compiling as I normally do. The config line for Dovecot is:
configure --with-ldap --with-ssl --with-bzlib --with-zlib --with-stemmer
--with-lucene --with-ldap
followed by make make install
Then a 'configure' for Pigeonhole, followed by make, yields:
libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2
On 30.10.2012 14:46, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 10/30/2012 4:00 PM,
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm compiling as I normally do. The config
line for Dovecot is: configure --with-ldap --with-ssl --with-bzlib
--with-zlib --with-stemmer --with-lucene --with-ldap followed by make
make install
On 7/28/2012 12:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 28.7.2012, at 21.50, Bård Johannessen wrote:
On 2012-07-28 18:36, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 27.7.2012, at 9.01, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jul 26 22:59:21 bubba dovecot: lmtp(20508): Disconnect from local: Client quit
(in reset)
in my log for every
I just tried switching to lmtp from lda. Messages are being delivered,
but I now see messages similar to:
Jul 26 22:59:21 bubba dovecot: lmtp(20508): Disconnect from local:
Client quit (in reset)
in my log for every message. Is this a normal sign-off - or does this
indicate a
On 9/16/2010 5:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:25 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs
openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations?
Dovecot's GNUTLS support was written long time
On 5/10/2012 10:02 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I am getting an SELinux error every time dovecot starts, because it is
trying to access my music directory (/srv/music). I've read the
doveadm-mount man page, and tried:
doveadm mount add /srv/music ignore
but it didn't make any difference.
Now, I
On 5/6/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with
a force-resync, but not sure.
I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to
have a number of users shown - they had all had their ACL's set
individually
On 5/7/2012 6:46 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 5/6/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do
with a force-resync, but not sure.
I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to
have a number of users shown
On 5/7/2012 11:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 16.52, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Ok - I broke it again. Tried changing mail_shared_explicit_inbox to no -
problem mailboxes disappeared again. Changed back to yes - they came back.
Problem with both Thunderbird and Roundcube
On 5/7/2012 12:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 22.13, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 5/7/2012 11:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 16.52, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Ok - I broke it again. Tried changing mail_shared_explicit_inbox to no -
problem mailboxes disappeared again
On 5/7/2012 1:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 23.27, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2012, at 23.15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So user1 user3 are missing entirely. If it breaks using the old style, then I
would see user 2 4 inboxes - but not user 1 3. I also have other folders
On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new
files? Particularly files of the maximum size?
You could do it with dsync.
dsync seems to do a marvelous job - new
On 5/6/2012 8:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into
new
files? Particularly files of the maximum size?
You could do
On 5/6/2012 8:12 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 5/6/2012 8:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt
into new
files? Particularly files
I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with a
force-resync, but not sure.
I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to have
a number of users shown - they had all had their ACL's set individually
and were shown in the list. doveadm acl debug
On 5/4/2012 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 30.4.2012, at 23.16, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but doveadm
force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis.
doveadm purge -u dmil...@amfes.com
doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file
With an error like this:
doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Error: Corrupted dbox file
/var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/mdbox/storage/m.20 (around offset=74408):
Unexpected EOF while reading metadata header
What can be done?
--
Daniel
I have isolated the corruption in a mailbox to 4 mdbox files. Two of
these (smaller) files cause the force-resync to report a breakage and
save the file as m.XX.broken. The other two (larger) files cause a crash.
Is there a way I can fix these files and recover the mails?
--
Daniel
Was there a doveadm command that checks the SIS files and removes any
not referenced? Will the doveadm purge -A catch that?
--
Daniel
Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new
files? Particularly files of the maximum size?
--
Daniel
Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but
doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis.
doveadm purge -u dmil...@amfes.com
doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file istream.c: line 466
(i_stream_grow_buffer): assertion failed: (stream-max_buffer_size 0)
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but
doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis.
Here's a backtrace -
gdb --args doveadm force-resync -u msie...@amfes.com Sent
GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.2-1ubuntu11) 7.2
On 8/13/2010 6:07 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 17:04 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
If we can't get clients to agree on a standard set of folders
(probably reasonably safe assumption)
[...]
I'm kind of annoyed with listescape though. Hopefully for v2.1 I can
figure out some
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:30:38 -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr
2012 11:06:48 -0700
Daniel L. Miller articulated:
Unfortunately,
the docs for the ltmp agent http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html [1] don't
say anything about adding these headers. I tried asking on the Postfix
list - didn't
On 4/6/2012 1:00 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I
have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include
X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers
On 4/5/2012 5:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-05 4:18 AM, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
Also with 2.x you may want to use LMTP rather than the LDA Piping.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
I am preparing to convert my main client's postfix_courier-imap setup
On 2/24/2012 10:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.2.2012, at 8.09, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
What did I do wrong to make this happen? doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Debug: fts:
Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'
That's intentional. shared/%n/ namespace has no mails.
Anyway, looks like
What did I do wrong to make this happen? doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com):
Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'
doveadm -D fts rescan -u dmil...@amfes.com
doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot
doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded:
On 2/14/2012 4:42 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no
errors
are logged - but I'm having
On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no errors
are logged - but I'm having problems deleted folders from trash. I've
enabled tb-extra-mailbox-sep. Two folders that were
On 2/12/2012 1:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc6.tar.gz.sig
I've finally finished all of my email backlog. If you haven't received an
answer to some question/bugreport, resend the mail.
This
On 2/13/2012 7:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.2.2012, at 4.54, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
With this configure line:
./configure --with-ldap --with-bzlip --with-zlib --with-solr --with-lucene
lucene-wrapper.cc:23: fatal error: CLucene.h: No such file or directory
Base on this error, I suppose
As the Boehm GC is an available option, do I take that to mean it's
beneficial for some users but not most?
--
Daniel
On 2/12/2012 9:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.2.2012, at 15.27, Mike Constabel wrote:
Another Question to this Option:
# tb-extra-mailbox-sep:
# With mbox storage a mailbox can contain either mails or submailboxes,
# but not both. Thunderbird separates these two by forcing
On 1/25/2012 4:04 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
Thunderbird. I see the following in the log
On 1/25/2012 1:39 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
On 2012-01-25 05:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
Here is my dovecot config:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User Quota
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
}
[..]
So it picks up my set quota of 3MB
On 1/25/2012 2:01 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
On 2012-01-25 05:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
Here is my dovecot config:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User Quota
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
}
[..]
So it picks up my set quota of 3MB
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
Thunderbird. I see the following in the log:
Jan 25 15:36:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file
mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed:
(mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name))
Jan
On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird.
I see the following in the log:
Dovecot version?
2.1.rc3. I'm compiling rc5 now...
--
Daniel
On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using
Thunderbird. I see the following in the log:
Dovecot version?
2.1.rc3. I'm compiling
On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote:
Here is my dovecot config:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User Quota
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
}
[..]
So it picks up my set quota of 3MB but dovecot is not rejecting emails
if I am over my quota.
Can anyone help?
Is the quota
On 1/9/2012 7:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.1.2012, at 1.48, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 6 09:22:42 bubba dovecot: indexer-worker(us...@domain.com):
Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 400 Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR,
code 18)) at [row,col
On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba dovecot: imap(us...@domain.com): Error:
fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 undefined field CC
On 1/6/2012 2:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 12.55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Jan 4 05:17:17 bubba dovecot: master: Error: service(indexer-worker): child
10896 returned error 83 (Out of memory (vsz_limit=256 MB, you may need to
increase it))
Jan 4 06:17:17 bubba dovecot:
On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Jan 6 09:22:42 bubba dovecot: indexer-worker(us...@domain.com): Error:
fts_solr: Indexing failed: 400 Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, code 18)) at
[row,col {unknown-source}]: [482765,16]
Jan 6 09:22:42
I thought I had cleared out the corruption I had before - perhaps I was
mistaken. What steps should I take to help locate these issues?
Currently using 2.1rc1. I see the following errors in my logs,
including out of memory and message size issues (at 15:30):
Jan 4 05:17:17 bubba dovecot:
Is break-imap-search still required using 2.1 with Solr to index TEXT
BODY searches?
--
Daniel
For a single server, is the Lucene backend now better than running a
Solr server?
--
Daniel
On 12/20/2011 2:18 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Does doveadm index -A INBOX reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed not subbed under INBOX?
It indexes INBOX (only) for all users. And it doesn't reindex
Does doveadm index -A INBOX reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed not subbed under INBOX?
--
Daniel
On 10/7/2011 11:08 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 10/6/2011 8:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb passdb, with prefetch:
[..]
I have added permissions for $allshared to a mailbox's Inbox. It
does not appear in the shared folders list. Other mailboxes
On 10/6/2011 8:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb passdb, with prefetch:
[..]
I have added permissions for $allshared to a mailbox's Inbox. It
does not appear in the shared folders list. Other mailboxes, with
explicit permission for a given username, work fine
Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb passdb, with prefetch:
hosts = myhost.mydomain
dn = cn=x,cn=y
dnpass = xyz123
auth_bind = yes
auth_bind_userdn = uid=%n,ou=users,dc=x
ldap_version = 3
base = ou=Users, dc=x
user_attrs = =home=/var/mail/%d/%n, \
=mail=mdbox:/var/mail/%d/%n/mdbox, \
On 8/31/2011 12:41 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
On 8/30/2011 5:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
A little OT - but I've seen a few opinions voiced here by various admins
and I'd like to benefit.
RAID-10 is fine (note that the default mdadm RAID10 isn't actually
RAID10, but it works well enough
A little OT - but I've seen a few opinions voiced here by various admins
and I'd like to benefit.
Currently running a single combined server for multiple operations -
fileserver, mailserver, webserver, virtual server, and whatever else
pops up. Current incarnation of the machine, after the
On 8/19/2011 10:49 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 8/17/11 7:42 AM, Adrian Ulrich wrote:
I read that XFS is a good choice, but is not
too reliable...
Are you using Maildir or MBOX?
In any case: XFS would be my last choice:
XFS is nice if you are working with large files ( 2GB), but
for E-Mail
I think we all know who the troll is here
Yup. Me!
**.:\:/:.
.:\:\:/:/:.
:.:\:\:/:/:.:
:=.' - - '.=:
'=(\ 9 9 /)='
( (_) )
/`-vvv-'\
/ \
/ /|,|\ \
/_// /^\ \\_\
WW( ( ) )WW
The parameters listed for nfs installations (mmap_disable,
doctlock_use_excl, mail_nfs_storage, mail_nfs_index) - are they
necessary for data integrity, and/or do they compensate for NFS latency
and improve performance?
My understanding is the indexes are a critical part of a dbox storage,
Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much.
Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server.
In particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux.
Initial questions on configuration:
Caching. It seems to me - and I'm probably wrong - that running
On 6/27/2011 2:51 PM, Patrick Domack wrote:
I wouldn't worry about *duplicate cache* as far as disk goes at all.
This duplicate cache is only going to benifit your vm, if the host
machine has enough left over ram. If the host machine doesn't have
enough ram, there won't be any cache to worry
On 6/27/2011 6:06 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Just all the mailing lists I subscribe to :)
means NFS. My initial testing shows NFS results in a dramatically
reduced
On 6/27/2011 12:48 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
In the storage configuration of your VM, where you select the type of interface
to emulate, there's a checkbox for using the Host's I/O cache.
Does VirtualBox uses that to trick the guest kernel into not consuming
memory for caching?
If you can
On 6/27/2011 1:03 PM, Ed W wrote:
On 27/06/2011 19:40, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much.
Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server.
In particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux.
Although not an option
On 6/27/2011 6:21 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
BTW, I'm assuming a proper virtualisation solution such as Xen
Paravirtualisation.
Proper? You don't consider VirtualBox as such?
In this instance, I'm using VirtualBox to run a few Windows guests - so
Xen isn't an option for me. And as far
On 6/17/2011 1:28 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Ok - so where are acl_groups, and their access, defined?
--
Daniel
The permissions are set in the 'dovecot-acl' files:
$ cat dovecot-acl
anyone lr
authenticated lrws
group=PublicMailboxAdmins lrwsik
You assign the groups to a particular user per
Can I use the .DEFAULT files with global acls to access all mailboxes
without explicitly sharing them first? Or must a share be created for
every individual mailbox before they will appear in the shared namespace?
--
Daniel
On 6/15/2011 10:42 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 6/14/2011 2:18 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
From the wiki:
ACL groups support works by returning a comma-separated acl_groups extra
field http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/ExtraFields from userdb,
which contains all the groups the user
If I have:
plugin {
acl = vfile:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/global-acls:cache_secs=300
}
And then a file /usr/local/etc/dovecot/global-acls/.DEFAULT with
owner lrwstipekxa
user=dmiller lrwstipekxa
Does that give me unconditional access to all mailboxes?
--
Daniel
From the wiki:
ACL groups support works by returning a comma-separated acl_groups extra
field http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/ExtraFields from userdb,
which contains all the groups the user belongs to. User's UNIX groups
have no effect on ACLs (you can enable them by using a special
Using LDAP userdb/passdb. Is it possible to define a default set of
ACL's at the userdb level, to provide access to shared mailboxes? How?
--
Daniel
On 5/31/2011 1:16 AM, Joseba Torre wrote:
On Martes 31 Mayo 2011 01:16:25 Daniel Miller escribió:
Having enabled shared mailboxes - is there a way to provide access to
all users' mailboxes by a given user? Instead of having to manually
provide ACL rights to every mailbox of every user?
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
