On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 3.9.2010, at 7.00, Noel Butler wrote:
I do take exception to be told this issue can be fixed, but NFS users
are not worth it, which is essentially what he told us, I dare say if
this list was flooded by dovecot NFS users
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 8/31/2010 10:22, Ariel Biener wrote:
Oh, and Timo, I don't think we are just a couple of NFS users. Maildir
and NFS are not as uncommon as
you'd think, even in very large installations.
NFS with maildir has
why you reply with 7 page of rubbish?
yes we all see you fan of director, many not.
why go on tangent about it, it already said it not for us, director not able
to help on 24 inbound mail server, else might well turn it all off now, you
clear yet? on any other list you be label troll
director is
have you been told where you might go lately and do with some part your
anatomy?
this Timo list, not you list, best remember this since you nobody this list
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:22:00 +1000
Edward avanti edward.ava
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 09:18 +0200, Cor Bosman wrote:
imap access is not common in this country, it is in fact extremely rare,
common only for webmail servers.
Much of Asia also no use imap as primary mail for
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:54 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
Halo,
Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load
balancer.
it is no advantage over a dedicated hardware solution, but director does
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Brandon Davidson brand...@uoregon.eduwrote:
Noel,
On 8/26/10 9:59 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
I fail to see advantage if anything it add in more point of failure,
with
i agree with this and it is why we dont use it
we use dovecots
Halo,
Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load balancer.
I fail to see advantage if anything it add in more point of failure, with
several hundred thousand user, we can ill afford to mess around or add to
complexity, sometime keeping it simple is simply way to be, when use
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 26.8.2010, at 23.54, Edward avanti wrote:
Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load
balancer.
It guarantees that the same user is accessed via the same server. Hardware
LB can at best assign
