RE: I can't configure shared mailbox ACLs using LDAP information

> I thought it was just a lack of skill on my part in finding/making the > correct configuration. I am curious about your results, so keep posting! :) > But what do large email servers that use Dovecot do? > > I thought it was an orchestration between OpenLDAP, Postfix and Dovecot > because

RE: Dovecot logging to files causes issues

> Am 19.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot: > > It most certainly isn't. nginx isn't running as root, yet it can log > > without execution permissions just fine. Absolutely nothing should have > > execution permissions if they aren't meant to be executed, which should > > only be

RE: Failing to archive many messages

> Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my > Archiving. > > I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by > the report-ham.sieve script): > > exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham & > > Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed

RE: Failing to archive many messages

> On 2024-05-09 12:03, Marc wrote: > > I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this > > is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for > > 'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages > > a

RE: Failing to archive many messages

I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for 'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages are being moved by cron jobs, and modification logs are put into their accounts.

RE: temporary auth errors

> > auth_failure_delay = 2 secs ? > > That will still simply wait before *rejecting* the login, compared to > *dropping the connection*. > > We are thus looking for three different behaviours: > > 1. If backend confrims auth, ACK auth + proceed (grant access) to email. > > 2. If

RE: temporary auth errors

> Looking for some advise. Hmmm, I am glad I took the time to arrange a proper ldap infrastructure. What ever gets hammered stays local > > What I'm hoping is that dovecot has some way to in case of such > "authentication backend" problem scenarios to ignore protocol and > politeness and

RE: doveadm backup empties the remote host? SERIOUSLY???

> > Sure it's my own fault - no discussion about that, but seriously? How > dangerously unintuitive it that? > I don't really get what is going on with remote host. How is a host name even relevant other than setting up the initial connection. I don't even see it in my storage mail files.

RE: Which DKIM application for postfix 3.9.0

I can remember looking at rspamd years ago. I thought it was a bit chaotic with all these rules. I can even remember asking developers some design questions which they could not answer. The fact that they generate their own graphs (still?) is also old fashioned. This Sergey that is working on

RE: Which DKIM application for postfix 3.9.0

> > I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0. I have not used DKIM in previous > postfix installs, but I would like to start now with the new google > rules. I have done some research and opendkim is the most recommended, > however, other research states the opendkim has been abandoned by it's >

RE: Uppercase username emails are rejected

> > No they aren't. The *host part* is case insensitive because the DNS is, Indeed. Letsencrypt is utilizing this characteristic, they query the same hostname every time with different randomized(?) capitalizations. I have no idea what the logics behind this is. Preventing this from showing in

RE: Uppercase username emails are rejected

> > > Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis > > unix/linux implementations, those are mostly well thought through by > > experts. This is from before the time that 'idiot' companies started > > using email addresses for logins, so it is easier (to track users > >

RE: Uppercase username emails are rejected

> > John Stoffel via dovecot skrev den 2024-04-16 14:51: > > > In general, usernames should NOT be case sensitive, that way leads > > madness. > Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis unix/linux implementations, those are mostly well thought through by experts.

RE: Message Age Deletion Query

> Hello.  Using Mochahost and want to delete mailbox items older than 1 > month (approx) from receipt . Reading DoveCot documentation, not finding > age query.  Can you please specify this for me and provide an example? > doveadm move -u $account Archive/$year mailbox "$mbox" SENTBEFORE

RE: server migration

> > > > • Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot [2024-04-10 21:07]: > > Guys, any help? > > What you describe is exactly what I have been doing since ... forever > Why? The whole idea about having a LTS distribution is that you almost never need to do this? It is not like the imap/pop/smtp

RE: server migration

> > Guys, any help? this lacks context. > Also, what would happen if the new server has a different hostname ? So put temporary haproxy infront of it? > Il giorno dom 10 mar 2024 alle ore 14:28 Gandalf Corvotempesta > ha scritto: > > > > Hi guys > > I have to migrate around 10k mailboxes

maybe list rocky and centos9 stream?

maybe list rocky and centos9 stream on the repo page? https://repo.dovecot.org/ ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: Users with enough rope to hang themselves

> > This is ... bug like. > > The user moves a folder inside another, the resulting path exceeds the > maximum length, the folder's content is no longer accessible, the user > complains. I don't think this is a bad idea. If this is really the issue. > Double trouble. The user proceeded to

RE: storage format migration for folders

> > > > doveadm sync -u testacc > 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/testacc/index:CONT > ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index' > > > > Which gives me the expectec result. But I have also an archive > namespace and an alt namespace that is going to be quite a lot

RE: storage format migration for folders

> > > > > > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize > mailbox > > > > > renaming > > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate > > > indices)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dovecot is, if you

storage format migration for folders

> > > > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox > > > renaming > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate > indices)? > > > > > > > > > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only

RE: Users with enough rope to hang themselves

> > > breaking the mail index > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox > renaming > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate indices)? > > > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mailbox GUID on > disk, and the folder name

RE: Users with enough rope to hang themselves

> > It was a constant pain ... Finally resolved by migrating them to MS-365. > Maybe dovecot would be more forgiving, but we did not dare to try. That is why these fuckers of Apple and Microsoft are doing it, and these morons at EU market abuse commissions don't get it, don't read complaints.

RE: Users with enough rope to hang themselves

> > > I keep finding myself in a corner with a user. He uses mail > extensively, which > > is fine, he has a huge archive of own professional correspondence, > which is > > fine, but he uses mail folders as if they were regular system folders, > with > > very long paths, and keeps renaming them

RE: [Dovecot] [dovecot-2.1.15] mdbox corruption, doveadm force-resync can't repair it (throws segfault)

> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] [dovecot-2.1.15] mdbox corruption, doveadm force- > resync can't repair it (throws segfault) > Are you sure it is not something else, your message is even empty. ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe

RE: Please do not remove replication

l/> (main site) > Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <https://ea.rna.nl/the- > book/> > Book: Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book-edition-iii/> > YouTube Channel <http://www.youtube.com/@GerbenWierda> > > > On 25 Jan 2

RE: Please do not remove replication

How many servers do you have? How many active clients do you have? > > Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please > rethink this. > > Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos > (on different operating systems), with dovecot

RE: Anyone Watching Actvity from this network? Attempting Dovecot Buffer Overflows?

And what if someone is on vacation? You can also use dnsbl on your submission, that helps a lot. > > Are there publicly available lists of IP ranges by region? > > There's no reason for any IP outside of North America to be contacting > Postfix on Submission (587) or IMAP, since these are

RE: Anyone Watching Actvity from this network? Attempting Dovecot Buffer Overflows?

Any traffic that is not your client's, is unwanted. I have never ever had some scanning company called me, saying 'here you have 100 us$ because we used your data' or 'here are some tips to configure this better'. If someone is scanning you, it is always in their advantage not yours, no santa

dovecot 2.0 supports EC private key?

Does dovecot 2.0 supports EC private key? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org

RE: The future of SIS

> Dovecot has this option to store attachments separately not? So I am > not sure this is then still a problem. > > > > Interesting. How do you tell dovecot to do that ? > I thought I read about something like this, mail_location = ATTACHMENTS=/attachment but now you have made me

RE: The future of SIS

> > > > The problem is a bit what everyone understands as s3. I associate > this indeed also with an http endpoint on object storage. But the ceph > plugin skips this http and talks directly to object store. I don't think > you would like to operate on this http level. If I look at this

RE: The future of SIS

> > 17.10.2023 12:22, Filip Hanes via dovecot пишет: > > S3-compatible storage is very good for multi-server installations where > you need redundancy, availability. S3 is basically HTTP server so you can > code your own logic on stored emails, balancers, caches, deduplication, > compression,

RE: The future of SIS

> > > > > > If you are using Ubuntu, OpenZFS is readily available, and support > deduplication natively. > > > I thought nobody sane actually used ZFS dedup because it eats RAM for > breakfast, lunch and dinner ? > What an interesting and informing reading lately!! Thanks everyone!!

RE: The future of SIS

> >>> > Is s3 not to slow for this? > > >>> I think the clue is in the name "s3-compatible". > >>> > >>> Clearly calling out to "real" (AWS) S3 would be a non-starter. > >>> > >>> But a local installation of something like CEPH, MinIO or whatever on > the > >>> same LAN ? I'd think that

RE: The future of SIS

> > > > Is s3 not to slow for this? > > > > I think the clue is in the name "s3-compatible". > > Clearly calling out to "real" (AWS) S3 would be a non-starter. > > But a local installation of something like CEPH, MinIO or whatever on the > same LAN ? I'd think that should be workable, no ?

RE: The future of SIS

> >> > >> What is being removed is the replicator plugin (that used dsync). > That's what is being referred to in the video. Replicator hasn't been > actively maintained for years now so this was dead code anyway. > > > > > > Well, so Laura is absolutely right ... > > "Things like dsync

RE: The future of SIS

> > > > If that is the case, well then I have to find another way to keep mails > in sync between 2 mailservers. Hope the community will find a new solution! > > > > I have been keeping one eye on Stalwart (https://stalw.art/) for a while > now. > > I haven't tested it as yet, but I'm very much

RE: The future of SIS

> > Hello to everyone! > > Ooops, we are using SIS, guess the solution for a similar optimization > will be > > a native deduplicated filesystem. > > did you really mean deduplicated or distributed? > I think this duduplicating. Storage systems are offering such solutions. I think ceph has

RE: The future of SIS

> Ooops, we are using SIS, guess the solution for a similar optimization > will be a native deduplicated filesystem. > Is this feature really useful? I can imagine if you are twitter or ig and everyone is posting the same video this could be usefull. Are there any stats on this available, so

RE: expunge & sh error

Why not run a cron job every 60 days on your accounts with something like doveadm purge -u $acc > I would like to expunge Inbox mailbox every 60 days > This mailbox is not in the config any I try to use "doveadm expunge". > But my sh configs doesn't works: Fatal: Invalid search date parameter:

RE: Roundcube

> > I am running roundcube and dovecot on the same machine. To avoid the > described scenario, I have: > > 1. Enabled and configured selinux on that machine, > 2. Enabled mail-crypt plugin with user keys in dovecot. > > This should make it hard for an attacker to get access to the emails > even

RE: Roundcube

> > Since when does a hacked website gain root? What argument is next, when > your > > storage solution is hacked they have access to your files? Are you not > working > > with linux? How frequent are exploits that give you a root. > > I was responding to jeremy ardley considering root access

RE: Roundcube

> > A web search on 'linux  web server exploits that gain root' will give > many examples. No, not. And you better get your info for this type of stuff from cve websites or apache vulnerability list. > Security design by first principle assumes that an attacker will gain > root access. I

RE: Roundcube

> > There is a generic issue with doing this. That is if you have roundcube > (or any other web mail interface) on the same server as dovecot, a > breach of the web interface could be quite serious and allow access to > the complete mail store. No this is crap. user/group is are preventing this.

RE: Roundcube

> > On 2023-09-08, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote: > > > The scenario you describe does not consider a breach of the web mail > service > > that allows root access to the file system. > > > > If the web service is compromised to that extent then the mail file store > is > > also compromised. >

Re: Trouble with SMTP, TLS and dovecot.org.

e gentoo stable?) will not allow TLSv1 or sslv3 connections bei default anymore. Wild guess: you need to explicitely allow for example DEFAULT@SECLEVEL=0 ciphersuite in postfix to make *your* openssl accept this remote sslv3 connection Cheers -Marc -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30

sso / sharing authenticated sessions how does it work

I am totally not experienced with setting up sso etc. I was wondering if/how it is possible to share an authenticated session between dovecot and the mail client with the webmail so a user does not need to login again. ___ dovecot mailing list --

RE: fail2ban / ldap login failure

> I have user database in ldap (samba). I want to use fail2ban to restrict > unsuccessful login attempts, but... I cannot see "Authentication > failure" message in ANY log. (/var/log/mail.log shows successful logins > as well as disconnects.) > How should I proceed? Check your dovecot.log

RE: Outlook not showing all email in inbox at random

I have discovered a whole list of bugs in Outlook 2019 and reported them constantly at this Q of them, up to a point where their advised workarounds where even contradictory and I got blocked. One bug that surprised me the most (existing already for years) is that if your outlook profile has

RE: Imaptest sigfault error

> I Tried to run the test with imaptest and got a segfault error. > Debug: > > Reading symbols from imaptest...done. > (gdb) run user="puser%d@am.local" users=0-10 pass=Us123456 host=ha- > rr.am.local ssl=any-cert clients=10 port=993 - secs=300 > no_pipelining > Starting program:

RE: Replication going away?

> > > A dns query for imap.web.de address records (IN A) returns two ip > addresses. > > > And I'm betting each IP is a hardware load balancer with crap load of > servers behind each :) > I am converting a bit to containers and there are so many applications that are not able to

RE: Replication going away?

> We are slowly but surely FORCED to use external/cloud services as Open > (and even closed) source tools are no longer use-able on own/private > infrastructures or need nuclear plan like budget and implementation > time/ressources (Yes it is a bit exaggerated ;-) ) > There are still people out

RE: Replication going away?

> > That simply isn't true, and I am baffled that you don't know that > replication works with a two server active/active setup for years now! > Two separate instances (active/active) on two different continents are a > completely reliable failover scenario for years now. > Maybe it works like

RE: Replication going away?

> > A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would > be overkill. > What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support. ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to

sieve accepting instructions from email

Before switching to sieve, I used to have something in procmail that would allow you to turn on an auto reply by sending an email. - send email to yourself with request - receive auth code - send auth code and auto reply text - receive confirmation the auto reply is on Is there some solution

RE: el9 rpms

> > > > On 01/06/2023 11:37 EEST Marc wrote: > > > > > > Is there a specific reason why there are (still) no el9 packages? > > https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3.17/centos/ > > https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/rhel/ > > > > Because 2.3

el9 rpms

Is there a specific reason why there are (still) no el9 packages? https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3.17/centos/ https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/rhel/ ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to

RE: LDAP olcAccess for auth_bind

> >> > >> I really got your point, but how you will implement aliases > > has nothing to do with dovecot, sendmail can get those from ldap. > > > >> or domain > > sendmail gets these from ldap (but requires a restart) > > > >> query or maybe quota? You still need to access ldap directly for >

RE: LDAP olcAccess for auth_bind

> > Am I understanding correctly that the auth_bind option, regardless of > whether it is set to yes or no, and even if anonymous access to the LDAP > directory is blocked, must be used with dn=cn=manager,dc=example,dc=com > and dnpass=password to enable authentication? Forget about using

RE: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

> > > On EMC Unity there is a NAS server parameter that can be > changed to > > > Maybe a bit to much of topic, but why EMC and not something like > ceph? You rarely see any interesting comparisons on line (except of > course the stupid ones listing features) > > >

RE: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

> > On EMC Unity there is a NAS server parameter that can be changed to Maybe a bit to much of topic, but why EMC and not something like ceph? You rarely see any interesting comparisons on line (except of course the stupid ones listing features)

RE: Multiple backends with NFSv4.1 (supports file locking): should work without Director, right?

> used director. real (hardware) load balancers are actually smart and > exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :) > because there runs no software on it, right ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send

RE: LDAP olcAccess for auth_bind

> > My LDAP server is installed on a Proxmox container using the TurnKey > Linux template. I always thought it was a clean Debian installation. I > tried it on a fresh Debian installation, and both olcAccess and the LDAP > tree differ significantly from what is provided in the template. > > I

RE: LDAP olcAccess for auth_bind

> Here are my default olcAccess settings after installation: don't put samba stuff here, just focus on one application's access. > olcAccess: {10} to * by * read > > However, I am not satisfied with these settings because using the > anonymous user, anyone can browse the entire LDAP tree.

RE: [External] Help - Permissions issue with new mail

> > I tried to copy my "old" mailbox to see how postfix regenerated it when > I logged in and this is what I got - Does it look right? > I think you can judge better if it is right. Did you configured it like this? Having everything stored on the disk with same userid/groupid would be the

RE: Best practice for Dovecot with LDAP and Postfix

> > > > > > > > ? Imho are these just arguments for people not being able to setup > an > > > > environment correctly. > > > > > > I do not intend to start a flame on this topic, it is just my > opinion. > > > > But writing it down like this is still educating people (incorrectly). > > > > >

RE: Best practice for Dovecot with LDAP and Postfix

> > > > ? Imho are these just arguments for people not being able to setup an > > environment correctly. > > I do not intend to start a flame on this topic, it is just my opinion. But writing it down like this is still educating people (incorrectly). > It's not about the correct environment

RE: Best practice for Dovecot with LDAP and Postfix

> > > so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as > userdb and > passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL > to > validate user accounts. > > Now I added an LDAP backend and would like to use that for

RE: Best practice for Dovecot with LDAP and Postfix

> > so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as userdb and > passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL to > validate user accounts. > > Now I added an LDAP backend and would like to use that for Dovecot and > Postfix. My first approach was to change the

RE: Blacklistd

> > Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard > to achieve the same thing you are after. > Given that blacklistd is just an intermediary like fail2ban, is > there a real need for dovecot interfacing with it? > > > Fail2ban and

RE: Blacklistd

> > Are there any plans to interface to blacklistd? > > -- Doug > > > Hi Doug, > > Since blacklistd uses PF, you can already use fail2ban or sshguard > to achieve the same thing you are after. > Given that blacklistd is just an intermediary like

RE: Investigating inconsistencies between converted and original mailboxes

> > Before attempting the conversion, I used this shell script to get status > information about each mailbox. It uses 'doveadm mailbox list' to get a > list of mailboxes for each user, and 'doveadm mailbox status' to provide > summary information. For example (username redacted) > > zxxx:

Re: Cannot reach documentation site

On 27/02/2023 4:13 am, Chris Candreva wrote: On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Ken Bass wrote: doc.dovecot.org does not have a DNS entry. It worked a few days ago, but not now. [chris@newpop ~]$ host doc.dovecot.org doc.dovecot.org is an alias for talvi.dovecot.org. talvi.dovecot.org has address

RE: Redundant Database, Pgsql ?

I don't even get what the advatages are of doing this with sql. If you use local replicated ldap and use local credential caching then your master ldap can go down without issues, even the local caching handle some local slapd issues. I guess the local caching is also faster. Afaik were

RE: NFS and performances

> > I apologize in advance as you probably don't want to here this. :) apology accepted! > I have a replicated system and tried to use NFS to a file share server > with dedicated gigabit links etc and my second replicated system. > > I have 300+ accounts and many have 20+ gig of data over 600+

RE: [OFF TOPIC] Re: Pigeonhole Sieve Vacation Reply-To peculiarity with inbound AWS-SES

> > >> The actual problem is that Pigeonhole responds to to=<010301863b0211fe- > 9416f5b2-7e18-4c03-a5e5-2204dd7946f8-000...@sa-east-1.amazonses.com> instead > of to=. > Yes indeed, why are companies misusing the envelope for something different than it should be. The worst thing is even that

RE: Corrupted sizes in cache once again

> > Maybe I was a bit unclear: I have about 1000 error messages per day from > random accounts (about 500 in total so far) on all clusters. These are > transparent to the user, so it's more like background noise at the > moment. Do you have ecc memory? > No VM involved. All machines are

RE: Corrupted sizes in cache once again

Could even be memory. I had once on an office machine a faulty memory module (without ecc), and it caused the md5sum from files on truecrypt usb backup drives to change constantly. Removed the module, and no more issues. > > Something to try, this all could be happening because of underlying

RE: IMAP tuning for Outlook 365

> > > Outlook (this if from experience) simply does not handle large anything > folders well, especially imap - hence the click at the bottom of a > folder to see more (ie history) ?? I don't think this is limited to imap, also in an exchange environment you have this 'click'. It is super

RE: How do you scale dovecot for good performance with Roundcube webmailer in front? (hitting limits without exhausting resources)

> > Generally speaking the setup performs OK, I wrote a JMeter Roundcube script to > test the Roundcube. This includes actions like listing mails and fetching > them. I am hitting a somehow dubious limit of 600 req/s though. (This includes > all kinds of HTTP calls to Roundcube, not only the ones

RE: Quota Clone Plugin

> > > > > For all of you who don't know this plugin. > > > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/quota_clone_plugin/ > > > > > > > Not really on topic, but does the quota support multiple filesystems? > > quota count plugin is the one we recommend to use. It is not filesystem > dependent.

RE: Quota Clone Plugin

> For all of you who don't know this plugin. > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/quota_clone_plugin/ > Not really on topic, but does the quota support multiple filesystems?

RE: Iteration failure on passwd-file when listing all users?

> I'm trying to get a list of all dovecot users, on a simple test setup on > my local network (which "works", in that I can get IMAP mails from dovecot): > > passdb { >driver = passwd-file >args = /var/mail/vhosts/%d/shadow > } > userdb { >driver = passwd-file >args =

RE: Self hosting solution for Christmas

> (mailcow does this commercially only and didn´t offer a GDPR > compliant contract). Maybe getting a bit of topic, but afaik being gdpr compliant you basically are when you do proper security and are not snooping into peoples data. What are they doing there at mailcow that they can't give you

RE: Self hosting solution for Christmas

> > Here my present for Christmas: a new version of HomeBox, the self hosted > email solution. > > Feel free to drop comments, create issues, update the docs, etc. > > I released this quickly before going on vacation, so you may find some > issues. However, this is mostly stable, and the code

RE: moving messages between namespaces go into purge

I am aware of this, and I am aware that I should use the purge only for optimizing iops use. But currently I purge every 2 months or so, so it is easier to use this to recover with an accidental delete. If then on the server an archive runs that moves messages, it is annoying that these

moving messages between namespaces go into purge

I think it would be nice to have an option where the moving of messages between namespaces (by automated server scripts) would not result in messages ending up in the 'purge' queue. Currently when you move these copied messages, they end up in the purge queue combined with messages that users

RE: Help with configuration?

> 1. I want to have incoming emails automatically placed in certain > folders instead of 'Inbox' based on certain criteria. For example, I > want all emails from PayPal to go into the 'PayPal' folder and all > emails from the Debian mailing list to go into the 'Debian' folder. Can > dovecot do

RE: The end of Dovecot Director?

> servers. > > > > I setup load-balance cluster for clients with HAProxy + KeepAlived + > Dovecot Director running in frontend servers, so sad we have to find an > alternative to replace Director in such case. The code is still available you just need to build it yourself. I think they will

RE: The end of Dovecot Director?

> Most small/medium servers do not need director. You can use replicator > get a pri/bu pair. > What is small?

RE: sieve script is too large (max 1048576 bytes)

> > In what section of the config is this limited? > > plugin { >     sieve_max_script_size = 1M > } Thanks!

RE: mdbox vs. maildir format

> > "Note that with dbox the Index files contain significant data which is > held nowhere else. Index files for both sdbox and mdbox contain message > flags and keywords. For mdbox, the index file also contains the map_uids > which link (via the “map index”) to the actual message data. This data

RE: mdbox vs. maildir format

> > i am considering changing my mailbox format from maildir to mdbox. the > reason for this is mainly, b/c i have (a) multiple large mailboxes with > tens of thousands of mail files, and (b) most of these mails files have > a > size significantly smaller than the sector size of the disk. > >

RE: is it possible to add a custom special use mailbox

> > Currently I am using this to try and catch everything in Sent. > > mailbox Sent { > special_use = \Sent > auto = create > } > mailbox "Sent Items" { > special_use = \Sent > auto = no > } > mailbox "Sent Messages" { > special_use = \Sent > auto = no > } >

is it possible to add a custom special use mailbox

Currently I am using this to try and catch everything in Sent. mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent auto = create } mailbox "Sent Items" { special_use = \Sent auto = no } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent auto = no } I would like to have something

how to configure imapsieve to be used per user

I only see configurations that are active for all users, how to configure this in the user sieve rules. I only need this for specific users.

sieve script is too large (max 1048576 bytes)

In what section of the config is this limited? I assume it is related to this >go1.13 memory model that allocates quite a lot of vsz?

RE: sieve script not modifying header

> > From the command line the sieve script is modifying the header like > this: > > su testuser -s '/bin/bash' -c 'cat test.msg | /usr/lib64/dovecot/sieve- > execute/sieve-test' > > However when executing via dovecot, the header stays unchanged > > require >

sieve script not modifying header

From the command line the sieve script is modifying the header like this: su testuser -s '/bin/bash' -c 'cat test.msg | /usr/lib64/dovecot/sieve-execute/sieve-test' However when executing via dovecot, the header stays unchanged require

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >