On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:16 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> The end goal is for my Webmail client to access dovecot mailboxes.
> Does it make more sense to do the more traditional route of making
> Webmail an IMAP client?
Yes. There's almost zero performance benefit for accessing mails via
lib-s
On Aug 6, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 6.8.2010, at 11.45, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
>
>> The first goal is to open these mailboxes(mdbox/dbox) with alpine version 2
>> and the mailboxes are on localhost.
>
> Why? Why not just let it use IMAP? Seems like a huge amount of work to
On 2010-08-06 12:28:28 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 6.8.2010, at 11.45, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
>
> > The first goal is to open these mailboxes(mdbox/dbox) with alpine version 2
> > and the mailboxes are on localhost.
>
> Why? Why not just let it use IMAP? Seems like a huge amount of work t
On 6.8.2010, at 11.45, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> The first goal is to open these mailboxes(mdbox/dbox) with alpine version 2
> and the mailboxes are on localhost.
Why? Why not just let it use IMAP? Seems like a huge amount of work to make
c-client call lib-storage. And who knows how many symbo
On Aug 5, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:12 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
>> Should this be doable with the current design?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Is there a good reference to do this?
>
> doveadm and dsync are good examples. Or maybe you shouldn't write a
> separat
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:12 -0400, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
> Should this be doable with the current design?
Yes.
> Is there a good reference to do this?
doveadm and dsync are good examples. Or maybe you shouldn't write a
separate C program, but a doveadm plugin instead (see e.g. doveadm_quota
pl
Should this be doable with the current design? Is there a good reference to do
this?
Thanks,
Jonathan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
