hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-09-13 14:03:
least to must pass Signature Verification. Have anyone managed to
configure EXIM to verify more than one DKIM Signature header?
postfix smtpd_milter_maps with a list of ips that is known maillists ips
is best for software that are brokken, use
>
> Google's corporate web page, Alphabet, Inc., is on the ".xyz" top level
> domain.
>
> * https://abc.xyz/
>
Google is probably to most fined company of all mentioned on this list,
breaking countless laws over decades. That is the company you have as
reference?
ped a woman from using "design." From: sebast...@sebbe.euSent: February 12, 2022 5:25 AMTo: dovecot@dovecot.orgSubject: Sv: Sv: Sv: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC Yep. Its a lot of TLDs that is banned at me,
Google's corporate web page, Alphabet, Inc., is on the ".xyz" top level domain.
* https://abc.xyz/
I suppose Sergey Brin is Russian as well, so what have you there?
Perhaps you have inadvertently confused ".xyz" with the ".xxx" TLD. The popular
grade school acronym for "eXamine Your Zipper" is
On 2022-02-12 12:58, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
Thats a TLD ban. Meaning *.ru is banned.
ru tld is not this time
same applies for my domain for example, I ban *.xyz, *.date and a few
others.
why ban tld ?
: host spam1.roosit.eu[212.26.193.45] said: 553
5.3.0
lets see
>
> (sorry for posting to list this, but I don't have any ways to contact
> Marc off-list now)
>
> >>
> >>Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
> >> false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my
> mail
> >> server IP address with
@dovecot.org
Ämne: Re: Sv: Sv: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
The ".top" TLD is popular among Russian spammers, ".ru" is a little too obvious
and honest for what it is, unless that's part of Biden's sanctions, the others
you mention look like vice
*.xyz, *.date and a few others.
>
>-Ursprungligt meddelande-
>Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Lev
>Serebryakov
>Skickat: den 12 februari 2022 12:08
>Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
>Ämne: Re: Sv: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
>
>On 11.
mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
On 11.02.2022 16:31, Marc wrote:
(sorry for posting to list this, but I don't have any ways to contact Marc
off-list now)
>>
>>Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these
>> are false positi
On 11.02.2022 16:31, Marc wrote:
(sorry for posting to list this, but I don't have any ways to contact Marc
off-list now)
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
server IP address with
On 11.02.2022 16:31, Marc wrote:
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
server IP address with major providers (like Google Mail).
How can you get a lower reputation? Afaik dmarc is
On 2022-02-11 16:27, Marc wrote:
wait for spamassassin 4, gmail does not let users change there missing
problems with no dnssec domains, how can google be serius there ?
google is only to be taken serious with acquiring new clients, if they
would take email serious they would eg spend money on
On 2022-02-11 14:31, Marc wrote:
How can you get a lower reputation? Afaik dmarc is just signing your
outgoing messages.
there is no repution in dmarc, it either pass or fail, if all fails, it
proves nothing, if all pass it proves just a litte that is not forged
content
maillist should
> wait for spamassassin 4, gmail does not let users change there missing
> problems with no dnssec domains, how can google be serius there ?
google is only to be taken serious with acquiring new clients, if they would
take email serious they would eg spend money on filtering their out going spam
On 2022-02-11 12:29, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
On 09.02.2022 16:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
I'm participating in ~20 mailing lists and only this one gives a
storm of DMARC reports on each my posting.
+1
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
false positives and I'm
>
> Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
> false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
> server IP address with major providers (like Google Mail).
>
How can you get a lower reputation? Afaik dmarc is just signing your outgoing
On 09.02.2022 16:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
I'm participating in ~20 mailing lists and only this one gives a storm of
DMARC reports on each my posting.
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are false
positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
On 2022-02-10, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
> It is possible for a mailing list to pass DMARC verification, but
> there doesn't seem to be a lot of motivation to put in the extra effort
> to make it work.
It is possible, but it breaks how many people expect mailing lists to work.
> when dkim pass there is no breakage, but dkim fail can lead to in some setups
> to make reject, even for maillists
> that is a design fail on dkim
I disagree. DKIM is doing its job. It is a design fail on the part of most
mailing list and/or lack of user's DKIM signatures.
Look at it
On 2022-02-09 17:25, Julien Salort wrote:
Le 09/02/2022 à 16:55, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
hope maillist users turn there dkim signers into sign only, not verify
aswell, verify must only happen in dmarc
I am a little bit confused.
- why not verify dkim ? It seems fine for your message. I
Le 09/02/2022 à 16:55, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
hope maillist users turn there dkim signers into sign only, not verify
aswell, verify must only happen in dmarc
I am a little bit confused.
- why not verify dkim ? It seems fine for your message. I get:
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom)
Google, Yahoo and Microsoft, the big providers all use ARC, and have used it
for years. But Wikipedia doesn't have much nice to say about it.
--> allows a receiving service to validate an email when the email's SPF and
DKIM records are rendered invalid by an intermediate server's processing.
On 2022-02-09 16:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2022-02-09 14:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We did that replacement for a while, but people complained. We have
ARC signing there, unfortunately it only works if you trust it.
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; talvi.dovecot.org;
dkim=pass
On 2022-02-09 14:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We did that replacement for a while, but people complained. We have
ARC signing there, unfortunately it only works if you trust it.
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; talvi.dovecot.org;
dkim=pass header.d=open-xchange.com header.s=201705 header.b=kWkbHwXq;
We did that replacement for a while, but people complained. We have ARC signing
there, unfortunately it only works if you trust it.
Aki
> On 04/02/2022 23:10 Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
>
>
> I get it too. These appear because they don't replace either MAIL FROM: or
> Mime From: with the list
I get it too. These appear because they don't replace either MAIL FROM: or Mime
From: with the list address. This causes validations to fail since the mailing
list is trying to spoof mail in your name, and of course, anti-spoofing
security is going to react. DKIM can be troublesome since
26 matches
Mail list logo