I have a production Dovecot problem and although I searched the mailing
lists, I could not find an answer and I hope you can give me a quick
answer/pointer in the right direction.
I have mails for a user (u...@domain.net) under /var/spool/mail/virtual/
domain.net/user and I want to move ALL the
ok u...@domain.com needs to exist before any operations can be done on it.
I discovered that dovecot does not consider a virtual mailbox active
until it is returned in the user database
see : doveadm user '*'
both accounts MUST be returned in the list (user@.net & user@.com)
from there it
ok not what you probably want to hear
c, python etc uses % as a variable indicator along with the next
character using a format variable (like %s being a string variable)
this is what is causing the issue
Not saying for sure but experience wise i am not familiar with any
system allowing a
Hallo again.
Dovecot is not doing a look up for the MailDirLoc in the mysql database
after postfix hands over the mail to dovecot-lda.
Postfix knows the right location
# postmap -q u...@domain.net mysql:/etc/postfix/Mail-Mailbox.cf
domain.com/user/
But apparently this has not worked as
On 8/1/22 11:15, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
> Very interesting new insights:
>
> When I use imapsync and let it synchronize mails from INBOX to
> INBOX/testfolder, the automatic replication works fine.
> All mails are synchronized between my two backends.
>
>
> When I move the mails to the
Hi,
I had a similar problem.
Solved with "password, TO_BASE64('%w')" and decoding later into the
(php) script updating my db
Il 01/08/2022 10:47, Franz Beslmeisl ha scritto:
In order to change the password scheme I wrote a script named
updateproxy that needs the plain text password from the
ok i went through this as well a bit
there is a replication full sync variable (i am having trouble finding it)
24h is the default but i might have rebuilt dovecot modifying this default
after i got things working i put everything back to default code.
yep i did
from
> (we're using maildir, so I can just rsync the individual mails/folders)
I'm curious if anybody experienced this issue using mdbox.
As far as I remember it's better suited for replication as filenames
and location do not change on disk (index only).
Best regards
Gerald
Hello all,
I would like to know if it is possible to add RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for
TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Little details, to know easily:
- tls-unique for TLS =< 1.2
- tls-exporter for TLS = 1.3
It is will be used by SCRAM-SHA-*-PLUS like
