On 26 January 2022 4.08.04 UTC, Noel Butler wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Wondering if anyone else is seeing this double Disconnected in the logs
>with current stable version, it only happens for pop3-login, and only
>with Too many commands... other pop3-login logging with Disconnected
>like
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone else is seeing this double Disconnected in the logs
with current stable version, it only happens for pop3-login, and only
with Too many commands... other pop3-login logging with Disconnected
like Connection closed (no auth attempts... etc are fine
Example of
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> I thought that
>
> ssl_ca =
> is worth a try.
Does ssl_ca even apply to dsync/imapc ?
Looking at the docs its all about client certificate authentication ? Something
which does not apply to my environment, and even if it did, it would not apply
to
Hi Laura,
On 25.01.22 11:48, Laura Smith wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion, I have a couple of questions about it though. > First, my understanding from the docs was that ssl_client_ca_* were
override parameters and that in the absence of the parameters, Dovecot
would default to using OpenSSL
>
> Marc> Why? Just disallow login, and that is from the perspective that
> Marc> a mail user should be limited mail resources.
> >>
> >> If the user does NOT need to login to the dovecot/mail servers, then
> >> not having these users at all is more secure.
>
> Marc> No, because there is a
> On 01-25-2022 11:35 am, Marc wrote:
> 2. if you do not use separate users, everything is written under the same uid.
IMO: So what? What is the difference between a linux user vs a virtual user
permission wise? They are both equally unprivileged users. If dovecot can get
to them, virtual or
> "Marc" == Marc writes:
Marc> Why? Just disallow login, and that is from the perspective that
Marc> a mail user should be limited mail resources.
>>
>> If the user does NOT need to login to the dovecot/mail servers, then
>> not having these users at all is more secure.
Marc> No, because
> Marc> Why? Just disallow login, and that is from the perspective that
> Marc> a mail user should be limited mail resources.
>
> If the user does NOT need to login to the dovecot/mail servers, then
> not having these users at all is more secure.
No, because there is a difference between a need
Hm, looks like I misunderstood initial error sieve-filter(root): Fatal:
Unknown user
filter-sieve do not understand -u postma...@domain.tld
Where (root) is about who runs the command, not who is not found
Anyway I've tried
# cd
On 2022-01-25 14:31, Eric Wood wrote:
sudo -u vmail sieve-filter -u postmas...@domain.tld
~/sieve/managesieve.sieve INBOX
sieve-filter(vmail): Fatal: Unknown user
~ is the users HOME dir, if -u is defined it possible could be another
user
so make sure shell define $(HOME) in dovecot auth
Hello
What do you get for
doveadm user postmas...@domain.tld
Kind regards,
Christian Mack
Am 24.01.22 um 13:59 schrieb Андрей Куницын:
> Hello
> I try to test my sieve script, but found out that it is impossible to use a
> sieve-filter tool with virtual mail users. It always uses a real user
> "Marc" == Marc writes:
>> So just to be clear, each user has a login on your mail server in
>> /etc/passwd? If so, I would strongly urge you to move to using only
>> virtual users on your mail infrastructure.
>>
Marc> Why? Just disallow login, and that is from the perspective that
For the benefit of list, I've decided to work-around the problem using:
imapc_ssl_verify = no
Obviously I still welcome suggestions as to how I can get dsync working with
Let's Encrypt certificates and when OpenSSL validates "ok" but Dovecot does not
(despite Dovecot supposedly falling-back to
Hello
Am 20.01.22 um 16:32 schrieb Johan:
>
> Jan 20 16:13:09 doveadm: Error: doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration
> file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf line 16: ssl_cert: Can't open file
> /etc/letsencrypt/live/delta.oxyl.net/fullchain.pem: Permission denied
Check permission on
I read the sieve-filter man page so I'll speculate. Granted, I still
don't fully understand how sieve and virtual users work as I have never
set this up.
"postmaster" is an alias of root and "vmail" is probably just a
directory name. So, from the root's command prompt, the environment
On January 24, 2022 1:33:46 PM AKST, John Stoffel wrote:
>steph> 1) How can I says sendmail to use the same passwd file ( with MD5) than
>dovecot ?
>
>Ah... just saw this. And I don't know how to configure sendmail for
>this. I would suggest you look on the sendmail.org site for help.
Hi John
I've been using courier-imap for several years in a relatively small reality
with about twenty users, in view of a migration from real box to a virtual
server I'm exploring dovecot as a possible alternative.
I am used to stopping the service at night simply to make backups and
> just an idea, but maybe that's the problem?:
>
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/proxies/
>
> "Note
>
> ssl_client_ca_dir or ssl_client_ca_file aren’t currently used for verifying
> the
>
> remote certificate, although ideally they will be in a future Dovecot
>
Hi,
we have the same issue and the same configuration except for Dovecot
version, ours is the latest into Dovecot repo; in addition we do not
have DNS round robin.
Does anybody have a solution?
Kind regards
On 07/09/20 15:53, Daniel Botting wrote:
Dear Sirs,
Further to my last email
> So just to be clear, each user has a login on your mail server in
> /etc/passwd? If so, I would strongly urge you to move to using only
> virtual users on your mail infrastructure.
>
Why? Just disallow login, and that is from the perspective that a mail user
should be limited mail resources.
Hi Laura,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 08:25:12PM +, Laura Smith wrote:
I'm having a frustrating problem trying to use "doveadm sync" to pull
mails off a server for migration purposes.
# 2.3.17.1 (476cd46418): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.17.1 (a1a0b892)
# OS: Linux
21 matches
Mail list logo
