On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 07:47 -0500, Harlan Stenn wrote:
then as late as possible in the startup sequence, run:
- ntp-wait -v -s 1 ; start dovecot and postfix (and database servers)
I'll +1 that advice, I introduced ntp-wait sometime ago when dovecot kept
bitching, not a single glitch
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 02:13 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There are several huge Dovecot+NFS setups. They use director. It works well
enough (and with the recent fixes, I'd hope perfectly).
Not to mention other huge NFS setups that don't use director, and also
have no problems.
The purpose of any build scripts --sysconfdir is to tell the
configuration to build in a path for its binaries configuration file(s).
Dovecot 2.1.3, seems to insist that that directory is now /etc/dovecot/
ignoring --sysconfdir=/etc as in 1.2.x and previous majors before that,
is this a bug? if
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:46 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.3.2012, at 15.26, Noel Butler wrote:
The purpose of any build scripts --sysconfdir is to tell the
configuration to build in a path for its binaries configuration file(s).
Dovecot 2.1.3, seems to insist that that directory
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 07:28 +0100, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
:2012-03-22T11:55:Noel Butler:
perhaps it should be renamed then, given it violates the known normal
for SYSCONF dir, you've just created another form of --datadir
Not really. The way I see it works as expected
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 12:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.3.2012, at 12.44, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
Timo wrote:
So the only way I can think of how to change this is to add another
option to optionally remove the dovecot/ suffix from the directory, but
is this really worth the
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:50 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.3.2012, at 3.19, Noel Butler wrote:
Yes, I was also thinking about that, but it's about removing the dovecot/
suffix from other directories as well. That might be something worth doing
(--without-package-suffix or something
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:50 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.3.2012, at 3.19, Noel Butler wrote:
Yes, I was also thinking about that, but it's about removing the dovecot/
suffix from other directories as well. That might be something worth doing
(--without-package-suffix or something
Older versions of dovecot (all of v1) can under some circumstances
screwup and leave hung login processes, this more often than not occurs
if you have network issues, requiring a restart of dovecot to clear
them. Timo has apparently, IIRC, worked around this for v2.x and it
should not happen.
On
It wasn't sent to the list, it was direct, therefore it IS spam
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, but what is exactly your problem with people offering professional
support for dovecot which is ON-TOPIC if this are not 20 mails each day?
signature.asc
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:42 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 10:56, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-05-17 10:20 AM, dovecot-20120...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 9:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
Tim is working closely with Timo, and I'm sure got Timo's permission
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:32 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
Jeff Kletsky wrote:
Even with good intent the message in question is clearly in
violation of CAN-SPAM and Cal. Bus. Prof. Code Sec. 17529, of which
the sender was informed of when my server was accessed.
---
And you have proof
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 11:35 +0700, Tamsy wrote:
All that noise because of one mail offering some paid support is so
one mail multiplies by all the miscreants in the world adds up to a
bucket load of crap
unnecessary!
Actually, it has merits, because it is spam, had it gone to users@ or
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 06:48 -0400, Jerry wrote:
basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day.
non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other operators with
their products did that. I've seen you bitch and whinge about far far
far less over the years Jerry.
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 09:43 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Almost every commercial product I know off does send unsolicited email.
Indeed, its why DNSBL's were developed
There's a delete or report spam button/shortcut key for that. If it helps
some other users, and more importantly the dovecot
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 08:25 -0400, Jerry wrote:
Hell I bitch about a lot of things; however, that does not change the
facts of the case. Only a subset of this list received the message in
question -
Likely to see how many people bitched before the rest
- and I was not one of them.
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 11:23 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Fine. i understand that. What i am suggesting is not making large LUNs.
you get the best performance with directly attaching disks to your machine.
That's simply not true. 99% of block latency is rotational. iSCSI
It's not about
Seem some people have never heard of keep it simple, stupidor
less is more ... sounds like a few people here are falsely propping
up their worth to their employers, making unnecessary BS to justify
their own existence.
My experience of over 20 years of this industry easily shows that
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:10 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
what you do not understand is that a proper SAN is NOT
an complex setup, it is in many cases a simpler one
because you have TWO controllers, disks with DUAL channel
and a proper RAID level in ONE device
to built all this redundancy at
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:32 -0700, Robin wrote:
Indeed. What I have seen is a create deal of variation in the
configuration (/etc/login.defs or your distro's equivalent) in terms of
making use of such things.
I don't see any added value to bcrypt over iterated SHA-512, really, and
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 11:12 +0200, Warren Baker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Morten Stevens
mstev...@imt-systems.com wrote:
No, greylisting is really a bad solution. It is not RFC compliant and delays
the mail traffic.
Since when? RFC5321 was updated to handle delays and then
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:06 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
You must not accept mail you are unwilling or unable to deliver - ever!
That insisted behaviour was changed four years ago, read up on RFC 5321
IIRC
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 07:22 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/24/2012 7:13 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
Jul 24 12:27:32 mx1 sendmail[31933]: q6OARUOM031928:
to=dovecot@dovecot.org, delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp,
pri=152317, relay=dovecot.org. [193.210.130.67], dsn=2.0.0,
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:31 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
24.07.2012 14:30, Noel Butler:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:06 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
You must not accept mail you are unwilling or unable to deliver - ever!
That insisted behaviour was changed four years ago
and like all the other constant off-topic crud here, you are free to
filter it out if you don't wish to see it.
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:46 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
People,
this is a mailing list dedicated to Dovecot and the protocols POP, IMAP and
MANAGESIEVE with the one or
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 10:16 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Try this:
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/spam/
It's also a good idea to place a disclaimer when advertising _your_
products and services on someone else's list
On 7/23/2012 8:58 PM, fy wrote:
what anti-spam for you used ?
As per this discussion almost a year ago, was there any attempt to
introduce failover mode planned Timo?
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 13:26 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
Perhaps it could be an option, either load balancing between all
available servers, or only using later listed servers when the
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's in my TODO, but I don't know when I'll get around to implementing it. So
many things to do right now..
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
thats a rather intelligent response now, isnt it troll.
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:21 +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 09/16/2012 12:48 PM Carsten Laun-De Lellis wrote:
Hi all
I receive the following error in my mail.log.
Does anybody know how to configure dovecot to get rid of this ?
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 12:48 +0200, Carsten Laun-De Lellis wrote:
Hi all
I receive the following error in my mail.log.
Dont use ldap, but, you should supply the output of dovecot -n it
might help those familiar with ldap setups assist you
Does anybody know how to
Spyros,
Sounds like you have bigger problems, as you appear to have no disaster
recovery processes, since your using a standalone server, as recommended
to you earlier by Robert, rsync is your friend, and not just now, but
daily :) setup a rolling 7 day rsync archive (sata disks are big, cheap
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last mail even if it
brings the user over quota?
+1 only if configurable, and with an additional configurable quota
percentage value option for those that do enable the
That's so sad, Marks a nice guy, and too fricken young for this to
happen
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 02:55 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org
Date: 20. marraskuuta 2012 2.44.51 UTC+2.00
To: im...@ietf.org, imap...@ietf.org,
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 19:49 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Who is the best CA Certificate provider for Dovecot?
Anyone but verisign, dont get me started on them :)
Now that Thawte are no longer owned by those criminals, I highly
recommend them for certs for web sites.
But if its just for
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 10:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Just to let you know: I'm planning on releasing v2.1.11 today/tomorrow. If
you wish to get something fixed for it, ask quickly. :)
hah, but u won t do it...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 01:06 +0200, Karolis Žvaigždinas wrote:
We're using Dovecot v1.2.15 LDA/IMAP/POP3+MySQL with quota plugin,
quota_rule per-user size, quota_exceed_message and quota_warning on
storage=90%%.with script.
Everything is working as expected.
But I've been asked to
Replying to myself is bad I know but its holiday time :) at least for a
few more days...
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 09:32 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
That said, if you use dovecot 2.0.x's LDA, you *can* do this now, and
the wiki IIRC, does tell you how - we still use 1.2.x so I don't have
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:29 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
slow drives. The reason is that few if any organizations actually need 28TB
(14
2TB Cavier Green drives--popular with idiots today) of mail storage in a
single
mail store. That's 50 years worth of mail storage for a 50,000 employee
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 21:09 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Brad Davidson put forth on 1/14/2011 6:25 PM:
We just bought 252TB of raw disk for about 5k users. Given, this is
going in to Exchange on Netapp with multi-site database replication, so
this cooks down to about 53TB of usable space
LOL this is just s funny., watching the no no no im right you're
wrong, give up stanley, those on many lists are aware of your trolling,
nobody cares about your lil SOHO world, this list contains many
different sized orgs, and like someone else mentione,d the 4K email size
is SO 1994, but,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 20:33 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Cor Bosman put forth on 1/16/2011 5:34 PM:
Btw, our average mailsize last we checked was 30KB. Thats a pretty good
average as we're an ISP with a very wide user base. I think 4KB average is
not a normal mail load.
As another OP
rsync not active? or now protected to mirrors?
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 18:52 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.13.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.13.tar.gz.sig
I've almost managed to read my email backlog, but there are still some
On 13.5.2011, at 2.39, Noel Butler wrote:
rsync not active? or now protected to mirrors?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
That clown is a tad over paranoid...
The only real issue with devices using ipv6 is that most people become
relaxed with security, preferring with ipv4 to do it all on the NAT box,
with ipv6 there is no NAT, so if you have 5 machines, you need to
configure full security on all.
If you're an
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:40 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much.
Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server.
In particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux.
I hope this is a lightly used server
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 02:21 +0100, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Don't mean to start a flame war, but your statement above is just simply
inaccurate. The main
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 02:54 +0100, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I should also mention that I'm refering to VMs using direct block
storage such as LVM, not VMs running off image files. Running anything
off an image file is indeed going to slow your system down compared to a
physical server.
I think we all know who the troll is here
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 07:14 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-06-27 9:06 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 2011-06-27 9:21 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level
of mail traffic else you'll soon
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 18:40 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Since maildir is IOPS heavy and NFS/GFS/OCFS don't seem to like high
IOPS workloads that make heavy use of locking, mbox becomes very
attractive due to it's very low IOPS demands. If you can live with the
folder tree limitations of
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 00:40 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 11-07-11 5:03 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On Linux, load average strictly shows total system CPU usage in
intervals, nothing else.
That would be FreeBSD, AFAIK. On linux, I/O does add to the load
You're right Miquel,
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:12 +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
30 Degrees Centigrade whilst 22 outside? Where the heck are you
living ?
Indeed, at 22c I'm still wearing a jumper :) ... 30c is just right.
attachment: face-smile.png
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:55 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/28/2011 2:51 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
Now the problem concerns outgoing messages. If I try to send e-mail
through out command mail (local user) or through out authentication
provided by a virtual user I get a bounce error
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 14:02 +0200, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi..
are there any proofen Methods to backup all mail ?
shutting down dovecot and tar the hole dir?
using rsnapshot?
any hints / thoughts
im running dovecot2 on freebsd
I assume it's only a single stand alone
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:12 -0400, Postmaster wrote:
I'm not able to access the mailing list archives following the
instructions here...
http://www.dovecot.org/mailinglists.html
using either IMAP or by downloading the mbox file.
replace www.dovecot.org with dovecot.org
the mirror
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 16:05 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
On 17/08/2011 16:00, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Is there any way to achieve this with dovecot? Does anybody have another
idea smoothly force used to switch to TLS?
Hi,
Maybe by sending them an email with a deadline for the end of
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:10 +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
On 08/06/2011 01:32 AM, Ian Evans wrote:
I run a Dovecot 1.2.16 pop3 server and have just started using the
Thunderbird 5 email client.
Thunderbird is set to leave the messages on the server unless they are
over 91 days old.
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:33 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
default_pass_scheme = PLAIN
Uhg i'll pretend I didnt see that :)
According to the sample SQL configuration file HA / round-robin
load-balancing is supported by giving multiple host settings, like:
host=sql1.host.org
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:16 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:02:57PM -0700, Noel Butler wrote:
suggest, having just one master server, after all, dovecot and postfix
just need to read, not alter/update/insert etc.
True; but the pieces that are altering/updating
Hi,
I've been away for a while, and the previous threads I stopped reading
because it makes reading War and Peace look more enticing.
Have you run in debug mode?
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
Hi;
I continue to be plagued with this error:
Oct 25 10:49:18
*sigh*
As usual Stanley, you do not contribute anything constructive, only
trollish jibberish
Charles' advice however would be my next step, but at this point I think
it's a bit drastic.
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f $SENDER -a
$RECIPIENT
get rid of this ^ in postifx main.cf
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=dovecot
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 21:35 +0100, Miguel Tormo wrote:
El Jueves, 24 de Noviembre de 2011 20:25:47 Timo Sirainen escribió:
I'm not sure if changing /etc/security/limits.conf helps. It's probably
only used by PAM when user logs in, so if Dovecot is started in system
bootup it's unlikely to
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 13:49 +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Then the 'S' flag is added to the current Maildir filename without
losing any other changes.
And this is supposed to work even over NFS? Great.
Absolutely, always has worked over NFS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Have you tried using a modern kernel? that one is about 2 years old.
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
Hey all, I upgraded some servers today from Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze,
and after the upgrade I started getting dovecot crashes. I was on 2.0.13 but
got these
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 02:32 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
# 2.0.16: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-xsserver x86_64 Debian 6.0.3
Have you tried using a modern kernel
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 00:49 +0100, Christopher Stolzenberg wrote:
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
xchris...@googlemail.com:
Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
that is 2.0.16-friendly, and
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:18 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
I'm with Jim. Debian has served me well for years. This is just
distro-bias. Sure, you need modicum more sense and hands on experience,
distro holy ways will outlast the real world holy wars, we each have a
distro we all stand by,
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
xchris...@googlemail.com:
Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:42 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 08:27, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:22 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
This also is not the kernel list, since updating to a kernel released in
the 21st century Cor's issue has gone away, so this thread is now rather
entirely pointless on the Dovecot list. So I'll my participation in
Actually, it hasn't.
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 06:31 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:13:36 -0500
Charles Marcus articulated:
On 2011-12-21 11:18 PM, Simon Brereton
simon.brere...@buongiorno.com wrote:
It would be interesting to chart the number of threads caused by
each distro. I don't know who
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:11 +, Alan Brown wrote:
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
another goose who think he's god...
if you dont like a thread, dont read it, especially since its been
marked as OT for past 10 or posts, ya moron.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways, but salt is the /solution/.
Agreed...
We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
unix_md5_crypt() for all general password
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 21:06 -0500, Patrick Domack wrote:
Quoting Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 03:26 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/05/2012 02:59 AM Noel Butler wrote:
We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
unix_md5_crypt() for all general password storage including mail/ftp
etc, except for web, where we need to use apache_md5_crypt().
Huh, why do you need to store
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 04:05 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/05/2012 03:36 AM Noel Butler wrote:
Because with multiple servers, we store them all in (replicated)
mysql :) (the same with postfix/dovecot).
and as I'm sure you are aware, Apache does not understand standard
crypted MD5
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:16 -0500, David Ford wrote:
with multiple servers, we use pam nss, with a replicated ldap backed.
public accessible mode :P oh dont start me on that, but luckily I'm
not subjected to its dangers...and telling Pascal bout Bourbon made me
realise its time to head
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 08:54 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
I guess you've been bitten by a proper database solution given
your apprehension for using one.
It's called experience. I could explain many cases where SQL is
overkill and overhead. But I don't do mail
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 09:04 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
The reason we moved from qmail/vpopmail CDB to qmail/vpopmail/mysql was
for a MASSIVE IMPROVEMENT in performance, then added dovecot in for
even more performance improvements, I too was hesitant, but a large
university having
HUH?
This has nothing to do with dovecot, dovecot gets the message once
postfix is done with it. if its not working, ask on postfix list.
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 18:51 +0200, fakessh wrote:
hello all reader
hello list
hello dovecot network
since I've installed dovecot deliver. e-mails no
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:48 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
Is there an obvious way around this? I know I could somehow merge the
changes into the running sqlite db but that undermines the simplicity of
the design I have. Maybe a patch to reopen the db if it's replaced? Or
perhaps I should
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:10 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-06-09 2:02 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Recalling now, I think this issue triggered me to ditch Evolution after
2 days of testing some years ago, and into using the same client
everywhere. But YMMV...
Everything I've read says
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:48 +0200, Johannes Dröge wrote:
Hello,
I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem where the maildir
resides have any quota or are full at the time of delivering.
The mails goes
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 08:28 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:48 +0200, Johannes Dröge wrote:
Hello,
I am having this error message on some rare emails with more than 6 mb
or so. Neither the dovecot server nor the filesystem where the maildir
resides have any
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 09:17 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
They're actually pretty reliable... but for me its more the privacy (or
lack thereof) issue that keeps me from using them more...
eh? you have far more risk of privacy invasion from google (by their own
admission so they know how
caution OS war related statements within :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:29 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
We are not in disagreement, we just apparently do things differently. I
prefer the 'rolling release' type of system that always has *everything*
reasonably up to date, and gentoo gives me
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:49 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
dovecot in mainstream, but hey, he still prefers sendmail over postfix,
which is fine for system only users, but most of us do a lot more, and
Claus has told me directly they will never support MySQL so we removed
Just want to clarify
re-sent , this never made it to the list, my anti spam system ate it :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:07 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
That's an interesting position/observation given that RHEL, SLES, and CentOS
(RHEL derivative) have the largest datacenter footprint in the US by far.
Across
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 03:31 -0700, Brendan McCollam wrote:
I'm running dovecot 1.0.7 on CentOS 5.5, and I've configured it to work
this version is so old it is essentially unsupported
The response seems to be nobody keeps their quota in MySQL, but the
Lots of people do, us included
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 14:05 -0700, Brendan McCollam wrote:
that 1.0.7 is a pretty old release, and you don't have much control over
what the distro maintainers choose to package.
This is the biggest problem most people face. But the freedom of the
Open Source world to use whats we want
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 09:53 +0200, Gerhard Waldemair wrote:
Am 23.06.2010 um 09:47 schrieb Marcus Linnenkohl:
Hello,
I'm new here, and I'm from Germany, so please be patient with me because my
English is not so good ;)
I am searching for a Step-to-Step Guide to first-configure
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 16:58 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 6/24/2010 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'd recommend also installing and configuring imapproxy - it can be
beneficial with squirrelmail.
Do you have any about a real world numbers about installation with and
without
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 02:18 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.6.2010, at 1.37, Noel Butler wrote:
If its running on a SOHO, you probably wouldn't even be able to measure
the difference, but for an ISP/Telco or large institution, you will
certainly notice the reduction in I/O (or loads
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 14:44 +0200, Amon Ott wrote:
For whatever it is worth, we use imapproxy, because it allows us to use
one-time passwords for webmail users. One login, not many.
With large enough auth cache, I think that
apologies, I sent this direct to Eric not the list ore OP, my bad :)
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 13:46 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
snipped 7 pages of irrelevant un-trimmed crap
now i would also need to edit the dovecot.conf file
could you guide me on what changes do i need to dovecot.conf
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 01:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 26.6.2010, at 0.57, Noel Butler wrote:
As I mentioned earlier It doesnt with squirrelmail, I tried it on
production and the I/O increased a bit, watching logging alone was
giving me a
headache (no, not in debug mode either
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 14:27 +0800, Angelo Chen wrote:
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
You're using system accounts so yes, but I'd hope that if server is on
any importance you would be doing more than just backing up that.
/home /etc /var/mail or
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 22:28 +0800, Angelo Chen wrote:
Hi Noel,
I use exim4 and it delivers right into ~/.Maildir, so I assume /home contains
all the emails, right? why we need to back up /etc and /var/mail? Thanks,
No real experience with Exim, last time I looked at it was 10 years
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 18:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
but if they don't virtual users is
just as easy/legitimate as system users with no shell access.
I agree, virtual users are not only easier to deal with, it gives you
greater flexibility, but most importantly, better security.
in the
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 04:01 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Anyone who isn't looking at mail logs or log summaries daily and taking action
on any problems needing attention doesn't count as a mail OP.
That's one of the most ridiculous things I've seen todate.
Do you seriously expect ISP admins
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo
