I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be mistaken.
My
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running
with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with
a
vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old
dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I looked through all of the 1.1 announcements and did not see it. I also
looked at the wiki page talking about the 1.0 to 1.1 upgrade, nothing
there.
I think the windows mobile device is looking for an INBOX. prefix where my
other setup (Thunderbird, Outlook
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ed W wrote:
I either misunderstand the namespace hidden option, or else perhaps it's
not
working correctly in 1.0.5?
dovecot.conf
# default namespace
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix =
inbox = yes
hidden = yes
}
# for backwards compatibility:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days?
Is it using SORT command? Apparently there are some bugs still
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages
I have a Dovecot setup for a personal e-mail server. I have a cron job
setup each evening which runs the following command to delete old
messages from my Deleted Items folder.
find ./ -type f -ctime +14 | xargs rm
I don't know that much about bash scripting. I would like the output to
tell
I just installed 1.1 beta 3 and noticed a problem when sending an e-mail
with Squirrelmail. When I hit send, I get the following error in my log:
Oct 16 11:35:54 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff): Disconnected: EOF while
appending bytes=1851/5926
Oct 16 11:35:54 apple imapproxyd[9132]: Raw_Proxy(): IMAP
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 11:47 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I just installed 1.1 beta 3 and noticed a problem when sending an e-mail
with Squirrelmail. When I hit send, I get the following error in my
log:
=20
Oct 16 11:35:54 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff): Disconnected: EOF while
appending bytes
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
So, what would
have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the
phone think all of the messages are older than 30
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:08 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
2 search since 6-Sep-2007
* SEARCH
2 OK Search completed.
3 fetch 1:* internaldate
* 1 FETCH (INTERNALDATE 23-Sep-2007 17:21:04 -0700)
..
Weird. Try the attached patch. What does it log?
Okay, here
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.10.2007, at 3.58, Jeff Grossman wrote:
2 search since 6-Sep-2007
..
Oct 20 17:54:47 apple IMAP(jeff): : since: 1190593264 vs 2147483647
Oct 20 17:54:47 apple IMAP(jeff): : since: 1190829893 vs 2147483647
I guess utc_mktime() doesn't work correctly for some reason
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 10/20/2007 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Search Problem (Was Namespace)
On 21.10.2007, at 4.21, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta4.tar.gz.sig
Lots of fixes since beta3, but apparently there are still a few bugs
left:
- Is SORT working?
- APPEND seems to have problems in some setups.
- Still some
zbigniew szalbot wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry if this is trivial. I am just concerned. In Poland we will be
putting the clocks one hour behind (back) on Sunday. I once saw
dovecot killing itself because I manually adjusted the clock in the
past. Will it not happen in this case?
Thanks for your
I installed 1.1Beta 5 this weekend. I had no problems at all yesterday
using Thunderbird. I started reading my mail with Squirrelmail this
morning and everything was going pretty smooth. I tried to delete a daily
e-mail I receive from careerbuilder.com and the IMAP process shot up to
99.9% and
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 08:08 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I installed 1.1Beta 5 this weekend. I had no problems at all yesterday
using Thunderbird. I started reading my mail with Squirrelmail this
morning and everything was going pretty smooth. I tried to delete a
daily
e-mail I receive
I am trying to figure out an issue I have with the e-mails in my inbox
showing up in Squirrelmail. I sometimes get (more often than I care for
it to happen) e-mails which show up as new either many hours ago or days
ago. I have one particular e-mail that in Squirrelmail is showing a data
of Tue,
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[SNIPPED]
actually, assuming you now have unstable in your sources.list, those
are packages currently installed for which there are updates available
(probably unstable updates...). Be careful or you'll end up farther
than you want.
I can't answer to the specifics
Jeff Grossman wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[SNIPPED]
actually, assuming you now have unstable in your sources.list, those
are packages currently installed for which there are updates available
(probably unstable updates...). Be careful or you'll end up farther
than you want.
I can't
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta8.tar.gz.sig
Changes since beta7:
- Added a new raw mail storage backend which allows opening
files/streams as single mail mailboxes. deliver uses this now
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 11.11.2007, at 20.43, Jeff Grossman wrote:
- Cache file tracks message expunges again
- All kinds of other fixes
- Some optimizations
I think we're getting closer to v1.1 RCs.
I just installed beta 8 and everything appears to be running
smoothly. Of course, my
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta9.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta9.tar.gz.sig
Some changes since beta8:
- This release should work perfectly with NFS attribute cache enabled.
- Fixes to handling what should be written to
I am trying to figure out why my mail clients are not correctly showing
me the received date versus the date header date. I am using Dovecot
1.1B9. Here is a copy of the rawlog from Dovecot when I started up the
client. Is Dovecot supposed to be sending the received date and the
date header
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 01.12.2007 4:03, Jeff Grossman wrote:
* 19 FETCH (UID 7607 RFC822.SIZE 4590 FLAGS (\Recent)
BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (FROM TO CC SUBJECT DATE MESSAGE-ID PRIORITY
X-PRIORITY REFERENCES NEWSGROUPS IN-REPLY-TO CONTENT-TYPE)] {353}
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:25:23 -0800
Gerard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:12:24 -0800
snowcrash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi frank,
Yes, that's true. But I had never problems to test new versions
with a modified port. I copied the port files to a new directory
and changed the Makefile, e.g.:
(snip)
This
Fábio M. Catunda wrote:
Hi!
I would like to find a way to not delete messages when they are
downloaded via pop3, is that possible with dovecot?
Gmail do this, I dont know how they mark messages that have been
downloaded to avoid clients to download it again, but it looks like a
good
I am running the latest version of the 1.1 beta and just got the
following error:
Jan 17 06:20:13 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff):
rename(/home/jeff/Maildir/.Sent Items/dovecot.index.cache.lock,
/home/jeff/Maildir/.Sent Items/dovecot.index.cache) failed: No such file
or directory
Jan 17 06:20:13
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 06:22 -0800, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I am running the latest version of the 1.1 beta and just got the
following error:
Jan 17 06:20:13 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff):
rename(/home/jeff/Maildir/.Sent Items/dovecot.index.cache.lock,
/home/jeff/Maildir
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
figure out where your mails are located.
Sorry for jumping in this thread. I am
On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
figure out where your mails
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Since /etc/procmailrc is executed as root typically, you probably need to
make this the first line of it:
DROPPRIVS=YES
At least, that's what I have, and that's my recollection of my reason. (-:
-- Asheesh.
That appears to have done the trick
I tried Squat indexing on my very small home system and when I did a
body search in Thunderbird, I got a TON, and I mean TON, of these
messages in my log file:
Mar 6 06:13:31 apple dovecot: child 14142 (imap) killed with signal 6
Mar 6 06:13:31 apple dovecot: IMAP(jeff): file file-lock.c:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I tried Squat indexing on my very small home system and when I did a
body search in Thunderbird, I got a TON, and I mean TON, of these
messages in my log file:
Mar 6 06:13:31 apple dovecot: child 14142 (imap) killed
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc2.tar.gz.sig
Timo,
FYI, that file is not in the rc directory. It is just in the 1.1 directory.
Jeff
Timo Sirainen wrote:
- Squat fixes and performance improvements
I am not getting as much errors as I was with RC1 in regards to Squat,
but I am still getting these:
Mar 7 20:29:52 apple dovecot: child 23968 (imap) killed with signal 11
Mar 7 20:29:52 apple dovecot: imap-login:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:11:23 -0700 Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 7-12-2008 1:17 PM Yavuz Maslak spake the following:
As I said previous my mail, if I don't set any value in Root folder path
option, my sent mails are stored in main sent items of Outlook Express.
These mails aren't
Outlook 2007 allows you to change the destination of deleted
items Check your outlook settings...
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
Our clients use damn Outlook 2007 and it is can not move deleted
messages to Trash folder.
As I see dovecot have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proskurin Kirill said the following on 19/01/09 16:06:
Well I search it but not found anything.
Outlook settings are a mess!
In some tab of the Options menu, you should find a button that opens a
window
where you can specify the location of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Grossman said the following on 19/01/09 18:43:
You are thinking of Outlook Express or Windows Mail. Outlook does not
have a Special Folders setting.
http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/microsoft-office/use-gmail-imap-in-microsoft-outlook-2007
On 2/13/2009 11:39 PM, dove...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 06:22 PM 2/13/2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 17:54 -0500, dove...@corwyn.net wrote:
When I delete that, now dovecot --exec-mail ext
/usr/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool
runs with no errors, no output, no anything.
The expire
I just looked over my logs and noticed the following error:
Mar 9 19:07:34 apple dovecot: Panic: POP3(april): Trying to allocate 0
bytes
Mar 9 19:07:34 apple dovecot: POP3(april): Raw backtrace: pop3
[0x492952] - pop3 [0x4929d3] - pop3 [0x4920e6] - pop3 [0x49cb8d] -
On 3/9/2009 8:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
I just looked over my logs and noticed the following error:
Mar 9 19:07:34 apple dovecot: Panic: POP3(april): Trying to allocate 0
bytes
Mar 9 19:07:34 apple dovecot: POP3(april): Raw backtrace: pop3
[0x492952] - pop3
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig
I think it's time to get v1.2.0 out soon. Shared mailbox code is
beginning to look like it's working and other features should work fine
also. I don't really see any
I am using Dovecot 1.2RC2 with Postfix 2.5.5. Everything is running fine.
I would like to start using address extensions and have e-mail
automatically filtered into folders based on the folder name after the +
in the e-mail address. I only use system users, no virtual users. I have
Deliver
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:14 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Everything I can find about setting this up applies to virtual users
which
I do not have. How do I get Deliver to recognize the address extension.
I am sure it is easy, and I apologize for not finding the answer out
On 4/16/2009 2:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:14 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Everything I can find about setting this up applies to virtual users which
I do not have. How do I get Deliver to recognize the address extension.
I am sure it is easy, and I apologize
On 4/16/2009 5:18 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/16/2009 2:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:14 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Everything I can find about setting this up applies to virtual users
which
I do not have. How do I get Deliver to recognize the address
extension.
I
On 4/16/2009 7:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 17:18 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Apr 16 17:02:34 apple postfix/local[5990]: 3BFF77B8F24:
to=jeff+...@stikman.com, relay=local, delay=0.06,
delays=0.01/0.03/0/0.02, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command:
/usr/local
. Just a thought.
On Apr 17, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I really want to try and get this plus addressing working correctly
with Dovecot and Postfix. After doing some reading I think I am
going to change my Postfix setup from mailbox_command to
mailbox_transport. I have a few
On 4/17/2009 8:46 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
2. Have all mail delivered for each user to the /home/vmail/user/
directory. All mail will be owned by vmail, but that is okay
since Dovecot is the only thing touching the mail files anyway
On 4/17/2009 9:24 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:10 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
You'll probably want to use userdb static now. Or if deliver needs to
verify that the user exists, use something like:
userdb passwd {
args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/home/vmail/user
On 4/17/2009 8:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I really want to try and get this plus addressing working correctly
with Dovecot and Postfix. After doing some reading I think I am going
to change my Postfix setup from mailbox_command to mailbox_transport.
I have a few questions to make sure I am
On 4/17/2009 12:39 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On 4/17/2009 8:14 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I really want to try and get this plus addressing working correctly
with Dovecot and Postfix. After doing some reading I think I am
going to change my Postfix setup from mailbox_command
On 4/17/2009 1:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:05 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I have come across my more problem. If somebody sends mail to JEFF
instead of jeff it is saying user unknown. How do I tell the pipe
command in Postfix to lowercase the username
I am starting to use Squirrelmail a little bit more to read my mail during
the day and I seem to be getting this error more frequently while using
Squirrelmail. Just a coincidence or do you think using Squirrelmail might
have something to do with it?
Corrupted index cache file
Should I be considered with this log entry?
rename(/home/vmail/jeff/dovecot-uidvalidity,
/home/vmail/jeff/dovecot-uidvalidity) failed: No such file or directory
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 20:39 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Should I be considered with this log entry?
rename(/home/vmail/jeff/dovecot-uidvalidity,
/home/vmail/jeff/dovecot-uidvalidity) failed: No such file or directory
Hmm. That's weird. Are you using maildir?
Yes
58 matches
Mail list logo
