[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-12 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 06/11/2010 10:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:22:28 +0200 > Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > > > cc'ing Thomas, who added this, I expect we could drop the NORETRY or > just add NOWARN. Though an order 1 page alloc failure isn't a pretty > sight, not sure how a

[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-11 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 06/11/2010 07:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:46:07 +0200 Thomas Hellstrom > wrote: > > > > David, I have a vague feeling that we've been round this loop before.. Why does agp_alloc_page_array() use __GFP_NORETRY? It's pretty

[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:22:28 +0200 Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >>> cc'ing Thomas, who added this, I expect we could drop the NORETRY or > >>> just add NOWARN. Though an order 1 page alloc failure isn't a pretty > >>> sight, not sure how a vmalloc fallback could save us. > >>> > >>> > >>> >

[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-11 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 06/11/2010 01:15 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 15:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the >> bugzilla web interface). >> >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:32:04 GMT >> bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:46:07 +0200 Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > >>> > >>> > >> David, I have a vague feeling that we've been round this loop before.. > >> > >> Why does agp_alloc_page_array() use __GFP_NORETRY? It's pretty unusual > >> and it's what caused this spew. > >> > >> There's

[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-11 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 15:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > bugzilla web interface). > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:32:04 GMT > bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > >

Re: [Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-11 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
On 06/11/2010 10:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:22:28 +0200 Thomas Hellstromthellst...@vmware.com wrote: cc'ing Thomas, who added this, I expect we could drop the NORETRY or just add NOWARN. Though an order 1 page alloc failure isn't a pretty sight, not sure how a

[Bug 16148] New: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x50d0

2010-06-10 Thread Andrew Morton
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:32:04 GMT bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16148 > >Summary: page allocation failure. order:1,