On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:39:24AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:17:16AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014
On 11/12/2014 12:31 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
>
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:28:41 + bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87891
>>
>>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:37:46AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:17:16AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Nov
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Poor ttm guys - this is a bit of a trap we set for them.
Commit a91576d7916f6cce (\"drm/ttm: Pass GFP flags in order to avoid
deadlock.\")
changed to use sc->gfp_mask rather than GFP_KERNEL.
- pages_to_free = kmalloc(npages_to_free * sizeof(struct page *),
-
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter > linux.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > There's no
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:44:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:22:45 +0900 Joonsoo Kim
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:02:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:54:01 + Luke Dashjr wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday, November 12,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:17:16AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter > > linux.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:02:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:54:01 + Luke Dashjr wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:49:13 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > But anyway - Luke, please attach your .config to
> > >
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:31:20PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
>
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:28:41 + bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
>
> >
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:17:16AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter > > linux.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:56:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:47:03 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" shutemov.name> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter > linux.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > There's no
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > There's no point in doing
> > >
> > > #define GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:49:13 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> But anyway - Luke, please attach your .config to
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87891?
Done: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=157381
Luke
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:08:55 +0900 Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Poor ttm guys - this is a bit of a trap we set for them.
>
> Commit a91576d7916f6cce (\"drm/ttm: Pass GFP flags in order to avoid
> deadlock.\")
> changed to use sc->gfp_mask rather than GFP_KERNEL.
>
> -
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, attempting to fix it up and continue is nice, but we can live
> with the BUG.
>
> Not knowing which bit was set is bad.
Could we change BUG_ON to diplay the value? This keeps on coming up.
If you want to add this to the slab allocators then
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> There's no point in doing
>
> #define GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK (__GFP_DMA32|__GFP_HIGHMEM|~__GFP_BITS_MASK)
>
> because __GFP_DMA32|__GFP_HIGHMEM are already part of ~__GFP_BITS_MASK.
?? ~__GFP_BITS_MASK means bits 25 to 31 are set.
__GFP_DMA32 is bit
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:47:03 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter > > linux.com> wrote:
> > >
>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:22:45 +0900 Joonsoo Kim
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:02:43PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:54:01 + Luke Dashjr wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:49:13 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > But anyway - Luke, please attach
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:54:01 + Luke Dashjr wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:49:13 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But anyway - Luke, please attach your .config to
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87891?
>
> Done: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=157381
>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:44:19 +0900 Joonsoo Kim
wrote:
> >
> > And it's quite infuriating to go BUG when the code could easily warn
> > and fix it up.
>
> If user wants memory on HIGHMEM, it can be easily fixed by following
> change because all memory is compatible for HIGHMEM. But, if user
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > There's no point in doing
> >
> > #define GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK (__GFP_DMA32|__GFP_HIGHMEM|~__GFP_BITS_MASK)
> >
> > because __GFP_DMA32|__GFP_HIGHMEM are already part of
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:28:41 + bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87891
>
> Bug ID: 87891
>Summary: kernel BUG
23 matches
Mail list logo