On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 09:31 -0500, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 06:57:24AM +, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > > index d50354bfb993..bef6d7f8ac55 100644
> > > > ---
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 06:57:24AM +, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > index d50354bfb993..bef6d7f8ac55 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > +++
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, "Usyskin, Alexander" wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
>> > index d50354bfb993..bef6d7f8ac55 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
>> > +++
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > index d50354bfb993..bef6d7f8ac55 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ static int
Thanks for reviewing the patch. I will fix the code according to your
recommendation.
I assume we could probably go with -ENOLINK as the error (instead of -ENOMEM).
However, i'll wait for Alexander to respond on whether he needs drm_WARN_ON and
your question on RPM.
...alan
On Thu, 2023-01-19
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 05:18:46PM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> From: Alexander Usyskin
>
> Add device link with i915 as consumer and mei_pxp as supplier
> to ensure proper ordering of power flows.
>
> V2: condition on absence of heci_pxp to filter out DG
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin
>