On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:26:45PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:17:08AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > External email : Please
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:27:14AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 10:24 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > > > Hi Maxime,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 11:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:17:08AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > > you have verified the
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 05:17:08AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> > you have verified the sender or the content.
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > Hi Maxime, Daniel,
> >
> > We encountered similar issue with mediatek SoCs.
> >
> > We have found that in drm_atomic_helper_commit_rpm(), when disabling
> >
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> Hi Maxime, Daniel,
>
> We encountered similar issue with mediatek SoCs.
>
> We have found that in drm_atomic_helper_commit_rpm(), when disabling
> the cursor plane, the old_state->legacy_cursor_update in
>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> things.
>
> For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:12 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> > out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> > things.
> >
> > For async updates we now
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:12 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> things.
>
> For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
> ->atomic_async_check and
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
things.
For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
->atomic_async_check and ->atomic_async_commit hooks. Support for that
for msm and vc4 landed.
On 04/13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 01:36, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel
>
> On 4/8/2022 9:04 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/7/2022 4:12 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:59 PM Abhinav Kumar
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rob and Daniel
> >>>
>
Hi Daniel,
An update on this
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:09:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > We integrated this in the (downstream) RaspberryPi kernel, and it seems
> > to trigger some weird regressions:
> >
> > - If we move the cursor under X, the primary plane update is stuck:
> >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:08:47AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 01:36, Abhinav Kumar
> > wrote:
> > > On 4/8/2022 9:04 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/7/2022 4:12 PM,
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 01:36, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> > On 4/8/2022 9:04 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/7/2022 4:12 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:59 PM Abhinav Kumar
> > >> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 01:36, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel
>
> On 4/8/2022 9:04 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/7/2022 4:12 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:59 PM Abhinav Kumar
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rob and Daniel
> >>>
> >>> On 4/7/2022 3:51 PM, Rob Clark
Hi Daniel
On 4/8/2022 9:04 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 4/7/2022 4:12 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:59 PM Abhinav Kumar
wrote:
Hi Rob and Daniel
On 4/7/2022 3:51 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jessica Zhang
wrote:
On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel
On 4/7/2022 4:12 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:59 PM Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Hi Rob and Daniel
On 4/7/2022 3:51 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jessica Zhang wrote:
On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
The stuff never really worked, and leads
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:59 PM Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Rob and Daniel
>
> On 4/7/2022 3:51 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jessica Zhang
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots
Hi Rob and Daniel
On 4/7/2022 3:51 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jessica Zhang wrote:
On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jessica Zhang wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> > out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> > things.
> >
> > For async updates we now have a
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 06:27:00PM -0700, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> > out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> > things.
> >
> > For async updates we
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 09:49:49AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi Daniel
>
> Am 31.03.22 um 17:20 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> > out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> > things.
> >
> > For
Hi Daniel
Am 31.03.22 um 17:20 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
things.
For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
->atomic_async_check and
On 3/31/2022 8:20 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
things.
For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
->atomic_async_check and ->atomic_async_commit
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 8:20 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> things.
>
> For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
> ->atomic_async_check and
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
> out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
> things.
>
> For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
> ->atomic_async_check
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
things.
For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
->atomic_async_check and ->atomic_async_commit hooks. Support for that
for msm and vc4 landed.
The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because it
out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among other
things.
For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
->atomic_async_check and ->atomic_async_commit hooks. Support for that
for msm and vc4 landed.
31 matches
Mail list logo
