On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:56:41PM +0300, Nikita Kiryushin wrote:
> On 2/29/24 15:30, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > I prefer the current way where we have no side effects in
> > the if statement.
> >
>
> This seem like a valid concern from readability and maintainability
> standpoint. My patch was
On 2/29/24 15:30, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
I prefer the current way where we have no side effects in
the if statement.
This seem like a valid concern from readability and maintainability
standpoint. My patch was aimed mostly at performance and maintainability
using tools: some more pedantic
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:32:47PM +0300, Nikita Kiryushin wrote:
>
> check_overlay_dst for clipped is called 2 times: in drm_rect_intersect
> and than directly. Change second call for check of drm_rect_intersect
> result to save some time (in locked code section).
>
> Found by Linux
check_overlay_dst for clipped is called 2 times: in drm_rect_intersect
and than directly. Change second call for check of drm_rect_intersect
result to save some time (in locked code section).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 8d8b2dd3995f ("drm/i915:
