Hi Jesse
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
> David Herrmann wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Thierry
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
>> > wrote:
>> >> Due to the
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:54:11 +0100
David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Jesse
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
> > David Herrmann wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Thierry
> >> >
> >>
Hi Jesse
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:54:11 +0100
David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jesse
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:00:34PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
[...]
> Also ${} is pretty standard in makefiles, isn't it?
The curly braces are allowed and valid syntax, but I haven't seen many
uses of them. Historically only $() was a documented feature, while ${}
was accepted as equivalent but
Thanks, David.
After "sudo apt-get install docbook-xsl" and configure the libdrm with
"--enable-manpages", I see the manpages generated.
Mark
On 01/20/2013 05:17 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
>> Hi David:
>>
>> Sorry for jumping in.
Hi David:
Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
will not be built("make html" does nothing), any suggestions?
P.S: I've installed xsltproc.
Mark
On 01/19/2013 12:01 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>> Hi
Hi Mark
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> Hi David:
>
> Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
> will not be built("make html" does nothing), any suggestions?
The manpages should be built automatically if you do "make". Or you
can try "make -C
Hi Mark
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang nvmarkzh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David:
Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
will not be built(make html does nothing), any suggestions?
The manpages should be built automatically if you do make. Or you
can
Thanks, David.
After sudo apt-get install docbook-xsl and configure the libdrm with
--enable-manpages, I see the manpages generated.
Mark
On 01/20/2013 05:17 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi Mark
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Mark Zhang nvmarkzh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David:
Sorry for
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:00:34PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
[...]
Also ${} is pretty standard in makefiles, isn't it?
The curly braces are allowed and valid syntax, but I haven't seen many
uses of them. Historically only $() was a documented feature, while ${}
was accepted as equivalent but
Hi David:
Sorry for jumping in. I pulled the ToT libdrm and it seems the manpages
will not be built(make html does nothing), any suggestions?
P.S: I've installed xsltproc.
Mark
On 01/19/2013 12:01 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
wrote:
> Hi Thierry
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
>> tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
>> fail.
>>
>> Using
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
> tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
> fail.
>
> Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
>
Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
fail.
Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
use that variant already so it makes the usage consistent.
Signed-off-by:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
David Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
> > Hi Thierry
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >> Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
> >> tarball and cause
Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
fail.
Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other variables and expressions
use that variant already so it makes the usage consistent.
Signed-off-by:
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
tarball and cause make distcheck as well as builds from the tarball to
fail.
Using $() isn't strictly necessary but other
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Due to the typo, none of the .xml files would end up in the release
tarball and cause make distcheck as well as
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:01:59 +0100
David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Herrmann
dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Thierry
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Due to the typo,
20 matches
Mail list logo
