W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 18:24 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
napisa?:
> Only VOLTAGE_SW uses current_vddc so it's irrelevant for other voltage types.
I introduced displaying this value in radeom_pm_info debugfs in next patch.
--
Rafa?
W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 18:09 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
napisa?:
> 2010/6/7 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
>> W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 07:00 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
>> napisa?:
>>> 2010/6/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
solution for older GPUs as
W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 07:00 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
napisa?:
> 2010/6/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
>> We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
>> solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
>> set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki
>
> I
2010/6/7 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
> W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 18:24 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
> napisa?:
>> Only VOLTAGE_SW uses current_vddc so it's irrelevant for other voltage types.
>
> I introduced displaying this value in radeom_pm_info debugfs in next patch.
It should be set to 0 by default unless the
2010/6/7 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
> W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 18:09 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
> napisa?:
>> 2010/6/7 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
>>> W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 07:00 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
>>> napisa?:
2010/6/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
> We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
2010/6/7 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
> W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 07:00 u?ytkownik Alex Deucher
> napisa?:
>> 2010/6/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
>>> We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
>>> solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
>>> set.
>>>
>>>
2010/6/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki :
> We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
> solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
> set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki
I actually had almost the exact same patch in my tree (broken out from
my
W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 07:00 użytkownik Alex Deucher
alexdeuc...@gmail.com napisał:
2010/6/6 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com:
We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
set.
W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 18:09 użytkownik Alex Deucher
alexdeuc...@gmail.com napisał:
2010/6/7 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com:
W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 07:00 użytkownik Alex Deucher
alexdeuc...@gmail.com napisał:
2010/6/6 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com:
We have similar tracking for engine and
W dniu 7 czerwca 2010 18:24 użytkownik Alex Deucher
alexdeuc...@gmail.com napisał:
Only VOLTAGE_SW uses current_vddc so it's irrelevant for other voltage types.
I introduced displaying this value in radeom_pm_info debugfs in next patch.
--
Rafał
___
We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
set.
Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c |8 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |8 ++--
We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
set.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c |8 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |
2010/6/6 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com:
We have similar tracking for engine and memory. We could think about some
solution for older GPUs as well, however there are not strict voltage values
set.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
I actually had almost the exact same patch in my
13 matches
Mail list logo
