On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:28 AM David Gow wrote:
>
> KUnit's executor_test logs the filter string in KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(),
> but passed a random character from the filter, rather than the whole
> string.
>
> This was found by annotating KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() to let gcc validate
> the format
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:28 AM David Gow wrote:
>
> KUnit's executor_test logs the filter string in KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(),
> but passed a random character from the filter, rather than the whole
> string.
Note: it's worse than that, afaict.
It's printing from a random bit of memory.
I was
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:14PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> KUnit's executor_test logs the filter string in KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(),
> but passed a random character from the filter, rather than the whole
> string.
>
> This was found by annotating KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() to let gcc validate
> the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:14PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> KUnit's executor_test logs the filter string in KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(),
> but passed a random character from the filter, rather than the whole
> string.
>
> This was found by annotating KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() to let gcc validate
> the
KUnit's executor_test logs the filter string in KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(),
but passed a random character from the filter, rather than the whole
string.
This was found by annotating KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() to let gcc validate
the format string.
Fixes: 76066f93f1df ("kunit: add tests for filtering
