On 1/25/2023 10:21 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:22 AM Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
-void dp_ctrl_isr(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
+irqreturn_t dp_ctrl_isr(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
{
struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
u32 isr;
+ irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:22 AM Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>
> > -void dp_ctrl_isr(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> > +irqreturn_t dp_ctrl_isr(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> > {
> > struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
> > u32 isr;
> > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> >
> > if (!dp_ctrl)
> >
On 1/19/2023 2:53 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
If our interrupt handler gets called and we don't really handle the
interrupt then we should return IRQ_NONE. The current interrupt
handler didn't do this, so let's fix it.
NOTE: for some of the cases it's clear that we should return IRQ_NONE
and
If our interrupt handler gets called and we don't really handle the
interrupt then we should return IRQ_NONE. The current interrupt
handler didn't do this, so let's fix it.
NOTE: for some of the cases it's clear that we should return IRQ_NONE
and some cases it's clear that we should return
