On 2/21/24 14:29, Justin Stitt wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:20PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
multiplication division helpers.
However, the variable
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:20PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
> which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
> multiplication division helpers.
>
> However, the variable is logged by some
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:20PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
> which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
> multiplication division helpers.
>
> However, the variable is logged by some
Am 21.02.24 um 10:27 schrieb David Gow:
The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
multiplication division helpers.
However, the variable is logged by some KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() using the
'%d' or
On 21/02/2024 09:27, David Gow wrote:
The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
multiplication division helpers.
However, the variable is logged by some KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() using the
'%d' or '%llu'
The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
multiplication division helpers.
However, the variable is logged by some KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() using the
'%d' or '%llu' format specifiers, the former of which
