On 11/20/23 14:19, Boris Brezillon wrote:
...
- dma_resv_lock(shmem->base.resv, NULL);
-
drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, refcount_read(>vmap_use_count));
if (shmem->sgt) {
@@ -157,8 +171,6 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:02:29 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 11/10/23 13:16, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 02:01:50 +0300
> > Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >
> >> Prepare drm_gem_shmem_free() to addition of memory shrinker support
> >> to drm-shmem by adding and using variant
On 11/10/23 13:16, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 02:01:50 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
>> Prepare drm_gem_shmem_free() to addition of memory shrinker support
>> to drm-shmem by adding and using variant of put_pages() that doesn't
>> touch reservation lock. Reservation
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 02:01:50 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Prepare drm_gem_shmem_free() to addition of memory shrinker support
> to drm-shmem by adding and using variant of put_pages() that doesn't
> touch reservation lock. Reservation shouldn't be touched because lockdep
> will trigger a bogus
Prepare drm_gem_shmem_free() to addition of memory shrinker support
to drm-shmem by adding and using variant of put_pages() that doesn't
touch reservation lock. Reservation shouldn't be touched because lockdep
will trigger a bogus warning about locking contention with fs_reclaim
code paths that
