On 7/29/23 01:03, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:58 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
> dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
>
>> 27.06.2023 20:16, Rob Clark пишет:
>> ...
Now these are just suggestions, and while I think they are good, you
>> can safely ignore them.
But
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:58 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
> 27.06.2023 20:16, Rob Clark пишет:
> ...
> >> Now these are just suggestions, and while I think they are good, you
> can safely ignore them.
> >>
> >> But there's also the DRM requirements, which state
27.06.2023 20:16, Rob Clark пишет:
...
>> Now these are just suggestions, and while I think they are good, you can
>> safely ignore them.
>>
>> But there's also the DRM requirements, which state "userspace side must be
>> fully reviewed and tested to the standards of that user-space project.".
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 2:23 PM Gurchetan Singh
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:33 PM Dmitry Osipenko
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/12/23 03:17, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
>> ...
>> > Can we get one of the Mesa MRs reviewed first? There's currently no
>> > virtio-intel MR AFAICT, and the amdgpu one
> Dmitry Osipenko (3):
> drm/virtio: Refactor and optimize job submission code path
> drm/virtio: Wait for each dma-fence of in-fence array individually
Applied these two patches to misc-next. The syncobj patch will wait for
the turnip Mesa MR.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 7:33 PM Dmitry Osipenko <
dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 5/12/23 03:17, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> ...
> > Can we get one of the Mesa MRs reviewed first? There's currently no
> > virtio-intel MR AFAICT, and the amdgpu one is marked as "Draft:".
> >
> > Even for
On 5/12/23 03:17, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
...
> Can we get one of the Mesa MRs reviewed first? There's currently no
> virtio-intel MR AFAICT, and the amdgpu one is marked as "Draft:".
>
> Even for the amdgpu, Pierre suggests the feature "will be marked as
> experimental both in Mesa and
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:59 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:07 AM Gurchetan Singh
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
> dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/16/23 14:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> > We have multiple Vulkan
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 10:07 AM Gurchetan Singh
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Dmitry Osipenko
> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/16/23 14:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> > We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
>> > of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the
On 5/3/23 09:51, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:38:45PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 4/16/23 14:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
>>> of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel driver:
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 4/16/23 14:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
> > of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel driver:
> >
> > 1. Venus
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:38:45PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 4/16/23 14:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
> > of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel driver:
> >
> > 1. Venus context
> > 2.
On 4/16/23 14:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
> of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel driver:
>
> 1. Venus context
> 2. Native contexts (virtio-freedreno, virtio-intel, virtio-amdgpu)
>
> Mesa core
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:22 PM Dmitry Osipenko
wrote:
>
> Hello Gurchetan,
>
> On 4/18/23 02:17, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 4:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
> > dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the
Hello Gurchetan,
On 4/18/23 02:17, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 4:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
> dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
>
>> We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
>> of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 4:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko <
dmitry.osipe...@collabora.com> wrote:
> We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
> of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel driver:
>
> 1. Venus context
> 2. Native contexts (virtio-freedreno,
We have multiple Vulkan context types that are awaiting for the addition
of the sync object DRM UAPI support to the VirtIO-GPU kernel driver:
1. Venus context
2. Native contexts (virtio-freedreno, virtio-intel, virtio-amdgpu)
Mesa core supports DRM sync object UAPI, providing Vulkan drivers
17 matches
Mail list logo
