Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] iio: new DMABUF based API

2024-03-05 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:59:47 +0100 Nuno Sá wrote: > On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 17:42 +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:13:58 +0100 > > Nuno Sa wrote: > > > > > Hi Jonathan, likely you're wondering why I'm sending v7. Well, to be > > > honest, we're hoping to get this

Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] iio: new DMABUF based API

2024-03-05 Thread Paul Cercueil
Hi Jonathan, Le mardi 05 mars 2024 à 10:07 +, Jonathan Cameron a écrit : > On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:59:47 +0100 > Nuno Sá wrote: > > > On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 17:42 +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:13:58 +0100 > > > Nuno Sa wrote: > > >   > > > > Hi Jonathan, likely

Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] iio: new DMABUF based API

2024-03-03 Thread Nuno Sá
On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 17:42 +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:13:58 +0100 > Nuno Sa wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, likely you're wondering why I'm sending v7. Well, to be > > honest, we're hoping to get this merged this for the 6.9 merge window. > > Main reason is because the

Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] iio: new DMABUF based API

2024-03-03 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:13:58 +0100 Nuno Sa wrote: > Hi Jonathan, likely you're wondering why I'm sending v7. Well, to be > honest, we're hoping to get this merged this for the 6.9 merge window. > Main reason is because the USB part is already in (so it would be nice > to get the whole thing in).

[PATCH v7 0/6] iio: new DMABUF based API

2024-02-23 Thread Nuno Sa
Hi Jonathan, likely you're wondering why I'm sending v7. Well, to be honest, we're hoping to get this merged this for the 6.9 merge window. Main reason is because the USB part is already in (so it would be nice to get the whole thing in). Moreover, the changes asked in v6 were simple (even though