On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 09:07:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:56:38 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > Yay, that patch is just impressive. Lands a new gpu tracepoints, never
> > even showed up on the gpu subsystem discussion list.
>
> I'm guessing there was some
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:56:38 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Yay, that patch is just impressive. Lands a new gpu tracepoints, never
> even showed up on the gpu subsystem discussion list.
I'm guessing there was some confusion. When this was first introduced, I
stated it needs to go into the gpu
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:10:20PM -0700, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> The existing gpu_mem_total tracepoint [1] is not currently used by
> any in-tree consumers, we should add some.
>
> In addition, there's a desire to report imported memory via the
> counters too [2].
>
> To do this, we'll have to
The existing gpu_mem_total tracepoint [1] is not currently used by
any in-tree consumers, we should add some.
In addition, there's a desire to report imported memory via the
counters too [2].
To do this, we'll have to redefine the event to:
a) Change 'pid' to 'ctx_id'
The reason is DRM
