On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:48:06PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:34:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:34:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:17:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:22:58AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
[ Re: [Intel-gfx] i915
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:22:58AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
[ Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 producing warnings with kernel 3.11-rc5 ]
Hi,
saw your
suggesting a wrong resolution or frequency are set.
Anyone?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several
call-traces ]
To: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet
nightly?
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/032154.html
Same thing observed with v3.11-rc7.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sedat Dilek
> Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM
> Subject: Re: linux-
-
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/032154.html
Same thing observed with v3.11-rc7.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130628:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130628:
>>>
>>> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130628:
>>
>> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
>> next-20130628.
>>
>> The trivial tree gained a conflict against
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130628:
>
> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20130628.
>
> The trivial tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree.
>
> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130628:
The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130628.
The trivial tree
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130628:
The regulator tree gained a
16 matches
Mail list logo