[stable] regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-22 Thread Florian Mickler
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:42:41 +0200 Karsten Mehrhoff wrote: > [Am 22.09.2010, 02:01 Uhr, schrieb Greg KH ] > > >>> Difference between 2.6.35.1/2/3 and 2.6.35.4 while watching some > >> videos: > >>> 2.6.35.4 switches the cpu for flash videos in the browser (opera or > >>> iceweasel) or other

regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-22 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:02:36 +0200 > Karsten Mehrhoff wrote: > > > Using the same .config from 2.6.35.3 to compile 2.5.36.4 results in a > > heavy load with 2.6.35.4. > > A regression within -stable is rather bad. > > > Example: > >

Re: [stable] regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-22 Thread Florian Mickler
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:42:41 +0200 Karsten Mehrhoff kaw...@gmx.de wrote: [Am 22.09.2010, 02:01 Uhr, schrieb Greg KH g...@kroah.com] Difference between 2.6.35.1/2/3 and 2.6.35.4 while watching some videos: 2.6.35.4 switches the cpu for flash videos in the browser (opera or iceweasel)

[stable] regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-21 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:50:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:02:36 +0200 > Karsten Mehrhoff wrote: > > > Using the same .config from 2.6.35.3 to compile 2.5.36.4 results in a > > heavy load with 2.6.35.4. > > A regression within -stable is rather bad. Agreed. > >

regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:02:36 +0200 Karsten Mehrhoff wrote: > Using the same .config from 2.6.35.3 to compile 2.5.36.4 results in a > heavy load with 2.6.35.4. A regression within -stable is rather bad. > Example: > > Difference between 2.6.35.1/2/3 and 2.6.35.4 while watching some videos: >

Re: regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:02:36 +0200 Karsten Mehrhoff kaw...@gmx.de wrote: Using the same .config from 2.6.35.3 to compile 2.5.36.4 results in a heavy load with 2.6.35.4. A regression within -stable is rather bad. Example: Difference between 2.6.35.1/2/3 and 2.6.35.4 while watching some

Re: regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-21 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:02:36 +0200 Karsten Mehrhoff kaw...@gmx.de wrote: Using the same .config from 2.6.35.3 to compile 2.5.36.4 results in a heavy load with 2.6.35.4. A regression within -stable is rather bad. Example:

Re: [stable] regression in 2.6.35.4 'load is to heavy (video subsystem?)'

2010-09-21 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:50:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:02:36 +0200 Karsten Mehrhoff kaw...@gmx.de wrote: Using the same .config from 2.6.35.3 to compile 2.5.36.4 results in a heavy load with 2.6.35.4. A regression within -stable is rather bad. Agreed.