r300 PenumbraOverture complete hang 2.6.35/36-rc4 (regression)

2010-09-17 Thread PJBrs
Hello, Last week I reported a complete hang with PenumbraOverture on kernel 2.6.35 and 2.6.36-rc3. This week I tried 2.6.36-rc4, and I still get a complete hang after playing PenumbraOverture for about a minute. I'm not using any xorg.conf, I'm using KMS. I also tried without KMS, and then I

Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 16 September 2010 20:32:36 Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2010-09-16 16:49, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Git blame shows this to be your code (copied from block/blktrace.c from > > years past). > > > > Is the lock_kernel() needed here? (although Arnd did add it in 62c2a7d9) > > It isn't, it can

nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-17 Thread Marcin Slusarz
Hi Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a couple of times a day: [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! [ 2869.618560] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2869.618600] last

[PATCH] drm/edid: Don't repeatedly log hex dumps of bad EDIDs by default

2010-09-17 Thread Andy Walls
On my system, every 10 seconds drm_edid_block_valid() gets called 4 times by radeon_dvi_detect(). This results in 4 instances of a multi-line hex dump of the same EDID (non-)data being logged every 10 seconds. Silence the hex dump from drm_edid_block_valid() unless a drm_debug module parameter

Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Petr Vandrovec
I'll try to come up with something for ncpfs. Trivial lock replacement will open deadlock possibility when someone reads to page which is also mmaped from the same filesystem (like grep likes to do). BKL with its automated release on sleep helped (or papered over) a lot here. Petr "Arnd

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Support for another B43 device id

2010-09-17 Thread Ike Panhc
We find there is another device id set for B43 chipset. After adding the device id 4E90/4E92 beside 4E40/4E42, the machine works fine with the same modification in xserver-xorg-video-intel. Signed-off-by: Ike Panhc --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),

[PATCH 1/2] apg/intel: Support for another B43 device id

2010-09-17 Thread Ike Panhc
We find there is another device id set for B43 chipset. After adding the device id 4E90/4E92 beside 4E40/4E42, the machine works fine with the same modification in xserver-xorg-video-intel. Signed-off-by: Ike Panhc --- drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c |7 +-- drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.h |

[PATCH 0/2] Add device id for Intel B43 chipset

2010-09-17 Thread Ike Panhc
There is another device id for Intel B43 chip. Since there is already an id sets for B43 in intel-agp and i915. We tried to modify the kernel and xserver-xorg-video-intel and they work fine on 8086:2E90/2E92 chipsets. I believe this id sets is valid[1], and another patches has been sent to bug

[PATCH v2] nouveau build regression, undefined reference to `acpi_video_get_edid'

2010-09-17 Thread Francisco Jerez
idia support. Thanks, pushed to the nouveau tree. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 229 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100917/9056e4ec/attachment.pgp>

[Bug 30227] Radom X.org freeze by a GPU lockup

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30227 --- Comment #5 from Michel D?nzer 2010-09-17 03:11:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > This happens with radeon.agpmode=-1 on the kernel boot command line. Without > it, the kernel doesn't boot (it freeze, without eth connection and monitor >

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 --- Comment #29 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2010-09-17 02:39:42 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=38758) --> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38758) screenshot with current mesa git (dab2a7660a407364a7327743b56ea9701d9b) --

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 --- Comment #28 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2010-09-17 02:38:12 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=38757) --> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38757) screenshot with mesa 9021c56a5738815777f27c39b63637b5975270c6 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 Pavel Ondra?ka changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35900|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 Pavel Ondra?ka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benjamin.segovia at intel.com ---

[Bug 29787] random XRandR failures (i2c related?)

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29787 --- Comment #9 from Arno Schuring 2010-09-17 02:19:58 PDT --- While I still can't reproduce this at will, both the EDID errors and xrandr resets seem related to system load. When the system is idle, or I'm simply browsing or text-editing, the

Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: drivers/gpu/drm/i810/{i810,i830}_dma.c: Fixable, but needs someone with the hardware to test. Can probably be marked CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP if

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: kernel/trace/blktrace.c: Should be easy. Ingo? Steven? Jens, Git blame shows this to be your

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:07:59 +0100 net/appletalk: net/ipx/af_ipx.c: net/irda/af_irda.c: Can probably be saved from retirement in drivers/staging if the maintainers still care. IPX and Appletalk both have active users. They also look

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 16-09-10 16:32:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: ... fs/ncpfs: Should be fixable if Petr still cares about it. Otherwise suggest moving to

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Alan Cox
net/appletalk: net/ipx/af_ipx.c: net/irda/af_irda.c: Can probably be saved from retirement in drivers/staging if the maintainers still care. IPX and Appletalk both have active users. They also look fairly fixable as the lock_kernel just maps to a stack private mutex, or in

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Anders Larsen
On 2010-09-16 16:32:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: fs/qnx4: Should be easy to fix, there are only a few places in the code that use the BKL. Anders?

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: net/appletalk: net/ipx/af_ipx.c: net/irda/af_irda.c: Can probably be saved from retirement in drivers/staging if the maintainers still care. I'll take care of the IrDA part. Cheers, Samuel.

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Jens Axboe
On 2010-09-16 16:49, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: kernel/trace/blktrace.c: Should be easy. Ingo?

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: Samuel Ortiz sam...@sortiz.org Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:57:56 +0200 On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: net/appletalk: net/ipx/af_ipx.c: net/irda/af_irda.c: Can probably be saved from retirement in drivers/staging if the maintainers still care. I'll

Re: [PATCH 00/15] change default_llseek action

2010-09-17 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:22:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann said: This changes *all* instances of struct file_operations in the kernel to have a .llseek operation and then changes the default to no_llseek, which returns -ESPIPE, which is what we had decided some time ago in a discussion with Christoph

Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-09-17 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
Hi, On 16 Sep 2010, at 16:04, Jan Kara wrote: On Thu 16-09-10 16:32:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: ... fs/ncpfs: Should be fixable if Petr still cares about

[PATCH 0/2] Add device id for Intel B43 chipset

2010-09-17 Thread Ike Panhc
There is another device id for Intel B43 chip. Since there is already an id sets for B43 in intel-agp and i915. We tried to modify the kernel and xserver-xorg-video-intel and they work fine on 8086:2E90/2E92 chipsets. I believe this id sets is valid[1], and another patches has been sent to bug

[PATCH 1/2] apg/intel: Support for another B43 device id

2010-09-17 Thread Ike Panhc
We find there is another device id set for B43 chipset. After adding the device id 4E90/4E92 beside 4E40/4E42, the machine works fine with the same modification in xserver-xorg-video-intel. Signed-off-by: Ike Panhc ike@canonical.com --- drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c |7 +--

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Support for another B43 device id

2010-09-17 Thread Ike Panhc
We find there is another device id set for B43 chipset. After adding the device id 4E90/4E92 beside 4E40/4E42, the machine works fine with the same modification in xserver-xorg-video-intel. Signed-off-by: Ike Panhc ike@canonical.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |1 + 1 files

[Bug 29787] random XRandR failures (i2c related?)

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29787 --- Comment #9 from Arno Schuring aelschur...@hotmail.com 2010-09-17 02:19:58 PDT --- While I still can't reproduce this at will, both the EDID errors and xrandr resets seem related to system load. When the system is idle, or I'm simply browsing

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 Pavel Ondračka dra...@centrum.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 Pavel Ondračka dra...@centrum.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35900|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 --- Comment #28 from Pavel Ondračka dra...@centrum.cz 2010-09-17 02:38:12 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=38757) -- (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38757) screenshot with mesa 9021c56a5738815777f27c39b63637b5975270c6 --

[Bug 28294] [r300g] Unigine Sanctuary v2.2: black glitches

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28294 --- Comment #29 from Pavel Ondračka dra...@centrum.cz 2010-09-17 02:39:42 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=38758) -- (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=38758) screenshot with current mesa git (

[Bug 30227] Radom X.org freeze by a GPU lockup

2010-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30227 --- Comment #5 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2010-09-17 03:11:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) This happens with radeon.agpmode=-1 on the kernel boot command line. Without it, the kernel doesn't boot (it freeze, without eth

nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-17 Thread Marcin Slusarz
Hi Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a couple of times a day: [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! [ 2869.618560] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2869.618600] last

Re: nouveau/ttm: BUG in ttm_bo_release_list

2010-09-17 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 19:43 +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: Hi Since upgrade from 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc3 (nouveau tree) I'm hitting this bug a couple of times a day: [ 2869.618504] [ cut here ] [ 2869.618532] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:153! [