Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate > locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell > Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB, > I can quite

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael > > Wysocki to the message ] > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wro

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested I email, so here it is. ___

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote: [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ] On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote: The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB, I can quite

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-20 Thread Luke-Jr
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested I email, so here it is.