Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:23:53 -0400, "Luke-Jr" wrote: > On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael > > > Wysocki to the message ] > > > > > > On Fri, May

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate > locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell > Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB, > I can quite

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael > > Wysocki to the message ] > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > > I submitted

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki > to the message ] > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > > I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago > > against

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote: [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ] On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote: I submitted

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:23:53 -0400, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote: On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote: [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ]

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested I email, so here it is. ___

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Ray Lee
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ] On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote: I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Ray Lee
2011/5/20 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking them any more now that 2.6.39 is out. Hopefully Chris is still tracking them, even if you aren't. Chris? What other information can the affected person provide, or what tests can

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote: [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ] On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote: The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB, I can quite

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Ray Lee wrote: > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki > to the message ] It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking them any more now that 2.6.39 is out. Thanks, Rafael > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-20 Thread Ray Lee
2011/5/20 Rafael J. Wysocki > It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking > them any more now that 2.6.39 is out. Hopefully Chris is still tracking them, even if you aren't. Chris? What other information can the affected person provide, or what tests can he run to

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-20 Thread Luke-Jr
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested I email, so here it is.

Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-20 Thread Ray Lee
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ] On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago > against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being >

Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

2011-05-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Ray Lee wrote: [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki to the message ] It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking them any more now that 2.6.39 is out. Thanks, Rafael On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06