On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:23:53 -0400, "Luke-Jr" wrote:
> On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael
> > > Wysocki to the message ]
> > >
> > > On Fri, May
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
> The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate
> locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell
> Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB,
> I can quite
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael
> > Wysocki to the message ]
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > > I submitted
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
> to the message ]
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote:
>
> > I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago
> > against
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote:
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
to the message ]
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
I submitted
On Sat, 21 May 2011 11:23:53 -0400, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote:
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael
Wysocki to the message ]
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago
against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being
addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested I
email, so here it is.
___
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
to the message ]
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago
against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the
2011/5/20 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.
Hopefully Chris is still tracking them, even if you aren't.
Chris? What other information can the affected person provide, or what
tests can
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 4:41:45 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee ray...@madrabbit.org wrote:
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael
Wysocki to the message ]
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate
locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell
Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB,
I can quite
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Ray Lee wrote:
> [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
> to the message ]
It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.
Thanks,
Rafael
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at
2011/5/20 Rafael J. Wysocki
> It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
> them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.
Hopefully Chris is still tracking them, even if you aren't.
Chris? What other information can the affected person provide, or what
tests can he run to
I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago
against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being
addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested I
email, so here it is.
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
to the message ]
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago
> against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being
>
On Friday, May 20, 2011, Ray Lee wrote:
[ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki
to the message ]
It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06
16 matches
Mail list logo