[...]
Well, I managed to run the newest binary snapshots by installing the
newest r200-snapshot (yesterday) and copying radeon_drv.o from 0924
into my XFree-dir. It works. I even have Xv.
That leads me to another question: what exactly is in radeon_drv.o?
It's the 2D-driver, the 3D-parts
Adam Duck wrote:
Joe == Joe Mackay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Frank Van Damme wrote:
www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~m9917684/r200-20020920-linux.i386.tar.bz2 should
work.
Joe Brilliant... thanks, you're a star!
Joe Working fairly well now,
I've tested the radeon, r200 and tdfx drivers and they seem OK.
I can't test the i810, i830, r128, mga, etc drivers (either because I don't
have the right hardware or mine's broke). Some of the other drivers (like
sis, ffb, etc) aren't enabled in the build process and haven't been ported.
New columns for gamma, ffb, mach64, virge, sis and trident.
Great work! Looks really impressive (and makes me feel really proud that
my chip is not the worst one:). A couple of easy questions:
is it true that Mach64 feature list is final (sure I do not mean
fallback). Also, 3 features are marked
Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002 10:32 schrieb Christopher L. Estep:
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Nützel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:53 PM
[-]
Here's the triumphant log attached as proof:
[-]
(II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled
(II)
I think I can fill in a few blanks for mach64:
Card names:
3D Rage Pro
All-in-Wonder Pro
Xpert 98/LCD/XL/@Play/@Work
3D Rage LT Pro
3D Rage XL
3D Rage Mobility
- No hardware stencil
- No mipmapping
- BLEND texture env is a software fallback
- texture environments which modulate alpha (AtAf) are
A couple of additions I forgot:
2D XFree86 Driver: ati_drv.o + atimisc_drv.o
- Fog is disabled if alpha blending is enabled.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
I think I can fill in a few blanks for mach64:
Card names:
3D Rage Pro
All-in-Wonder Pro
Xpert 98/LCD/XL/@Play/@Work
3D
Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
I've created a new DRI branch: mesa-4-1-branch
I'm in the process of porting all the DRI drivers to the new Mesa 4.1
code.
I'll be checking in changes soon, but don't expect anything to run or
even
compile. I'll post again when
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
side of the planes looks good, the other one is black, so I thought it
might be related to two-sided primitives.
Indeed, the hardware TCL code has a fallback for
Dieter Nützel wrote:
OK, the IRQ stuff seems working currectly on my dual Athlon SMP box.
I can second that, q3a works fast and stable for me, too, now!
The 50-FPS-limit I used to experience is gone, and overall performance
is a lot better, too
demo four now gives me about 48 FPS
Leif Delgass wrote:
A couple of additions I forgot:
2D XFree86 Driver: ati_drv.o + atimisc_drv.o
- Fog is disabled if alpha blending is enabled.
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
I think I can fill in a few blanks for mach64:
Card names:
3D Rage Pro
All-in-Wonder Pro
Xpert
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
side of the planes looks good, the other one is black, so I thought it
might be related
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 18:52, Felix Kühling wrote:
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
side of the planes looks good,
Felix Kühling wrote:
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
side of the planes looks good, the other one is black, so I thought
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:00:18 +0100
Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the
Hi.
I still cant use the daily snapshots - I get Sig11's and no display.
Are the snapshots still not glibc2.2 compatible?
I have X 4.2.1 and the latest snapshot. do I need anything else?
(radeon 7500, btw)
---
This sf.net email is
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 19:21, Ian Molton wrote:
I still cant use the daily snapshots - I get Sig11's and no display.
Are the snapshots still not glibc2.2 compatible?
That never mattered for the server. It would be interesting to know what
compiler version your XFree86 was built with, and/or
Am Freitag, 11. Oktober 2002 19:07 schrieb Felix Kühling:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:00:18 +0100
Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with
Sorry for the delay, but it has been a busy day today.
The libxaa.a module build from today's CVS using gcc-2.95.3/glibc-2.2.5 is
available at
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/libxaa.a.bz2
This expands to some fat 6MB due to the debug info, but first try it as
is before attempt
Title: Dear Friend
Dear Friend,
We would like to introduce ourselves
Creativeskulls, We are a new media concern having a setup of 11 high end
workstations. We are looking for business partners/clients who are interested in
offloading their work. Our rate is only 5 US$ for an hour of
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 04:27, David D. Hagood wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
BTW I think this bug is fixed in XFree86 CVS.
No, it is not. I've called this one out a few times, but it still
persists. I cannot beleive I am the only one with a Radeon 7500 DW and a
good monitor.
You have
Michel Dänzer wrote:
You have tried XFree86 CVS as in http://www.xfree86.org/cvs/ ?
That I have NOT tried - I assumed that at that level DRI and XFree would
be the same (in other words, that the primary difference would be the 3D
subsystem).
But I could try it, then diff the two if the
Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
New columns for gamma, ffb, mach64, virge, sis and trident.
Great work! Looks really impressive (and makes me feel really proud that
my chip is not the worst one:). A couple of easy questions:
is it true that Mach64 feature list is final (sure I do not mean
fallback).
- Forwarded message from Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:11:50 +0100
From: Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock
To: José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:31:53 +0100
José
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:00:18PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option). One
On 2002.10.11 21:31 José Fonseca wrote:
Sorry for the delay, but it has been a busy day today.
The libxaa.a module build from today's CVS using
gcc-2.95.3/glibc-2.2.5 is available at
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/libxaa.a.bz2
This expands to some fat 6MB due to the debug
On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 18:52, Felix Kühling wrote:
On 11 Oct 2002 18:15:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking into the lighting issues Felix reported with the
xscreensaver pulsar hack (when running it with the -light option).
[...]
One observation which
27 matches
Mail list logo
