On Wednesday 18 December 2002 11:20 pm, you wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:10:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You have to balance things out. Yes, the US is litiginous, and clearly way
too much so. Is the answer to just cower in a hole and hope it passes?
Maybe. And maybe not.
Title: BAÐIMSIZ ÇALIÞ - SINIRSIZ KAZAN
Sevgili Dost,
Sizinle baðlantý kurdum çünkü eðer aradýðým kiþiyseniz sahip olduðum þey
sizin için çok ciddi ve özel bir teklif olabilir.
Ýzninizle önce size kendimden ve iþimden bahsetmek istiyorum.
Sonra sizin için burada ne olduðundan
Had to change my mail setup to get this to sf.net...
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
---BeginMessage---
Currently, an arbitrary number of signals can be scheduled, potentially
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, magenta wrote:
Also, what about doing hardware-only support, and just breaking for
software fallback? Then it'd be up to the hardware (which ostensibly has a
license) to implement the algorithm.
That sounds like a good approach (and almost certainly acceptable for
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:59:24AM -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
And there is no one involved with DRI with assets to
pay such an award anyway.
Except all the distros.
--
Smile! http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990315.html
---
This SF.NET
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:59:24AM -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
magenta wrote:
You don't understand how patents work, do you? All of those people
(except OpenIL, anyway) have licensed the algorithm itself. The
algorithm is freely-available (it's even part of the patent
documents). The
magenta wrote:
But they're not transferring the license to others, they're just
providing a reference implementation. nVidia themselves wouldn't be
sued for it, but someone releasing new software using that
implementation could be.
By that same logic, DRI can't be sued for providing the code
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:32:02AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:59:24AM -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
And there is no one involved with DRI with assets to
pay such an award anyway.
Except all the distros.
I think
: )))
FIRST MORTGAGE NETWORK
FMN
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:43:48PM -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
magenta wrote:
But they're not transferring the license to others, they're just
providing a reference implementation. nVidia themselves wouldn't be
sued for it, but someone releasing new software using that
implementation
10 matches
Mail list logo
